Functional Gait Assessment to Predict the Risk of Falls in Elderly

  • Saktivi Harkitasari Warmadewa University
  • Cokorda Agung Wahyu Purnamasidhi Udayana University
  • RA Tuty Kuswardhani Udayana University

Abstrak

Aging process represents the natural process which is inevitable. It is caused by a biological factor that goes naturally resulting in the anatomical, biochemical and physiological changes. The natural changes contribute to falling in elderly. The objective of this study was to assess the falling prediction in elderly by using Functional Gait Assessment. This study used a cross-sectional research design with falling prediction as the variable. Forty-three elderly in Panti Werdha Wana Seraya (aged 60-103 years, - mean of 77.48 ± 1.61), selected according to the inclusion criteria, were included in the study. The data were collected using Functional Gait Assessment and analyzed both descriptively and statistically. The results showed that the elderly had a high risk of falls. Functional Gait Assessment showed that 41 of 43 subjects scored <20, indicating that 95.3% elderly had a bad gait assessment. Based on gender distribution, bad gait assessment was found in 10 male subjects (23.3%) and in 33 female subjects (76.7%). Eight subjects (18.6%) had 1time falls, 26 subjects (60.4%) had 2 times falls, and 9 (20.9%) had 3 times falls. We found there was a significant correlation between score of Functional Gait Assessment and the number of falls based on the bivariate analysis (r=0.36; p<0.01). It is concluded that Functional Gait Assessment can be used to predict the risk of falls in elderly.

Referensi

King BM. 2004. Falls. In: Hazzard WR, Blass JP, Halter JB, Ouslander JG, Tinetti M, eds. Principles of geriatric medicine & gerontology 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp 1517-29.

Stocklager J, Schaeffer L. 2008. Pocket book of elderly care in gerontologic 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp 228-232

Darmojo B. 2009. Buku Ajar Geriatri (Ilmu Kesehatan Lanjut Usia) edisi ke-4. Jakarta: penerbit FKUI. hal 175-79.

Susan LW, Gregory FM, Annika S, Diane M. 2004. The sensitivity and specificity of the Timed “Up & Go†and the dynamic gait index for self-reported falls in persons with vestibular disorders, Journal of Vestibular research no. 14: pp 397-409.

Barr R. 2005. Screening Elderly Women for Risk of Future Fracture – Participation Rate and Impact on Incidence of Falls and Fracktures. Jurnal Calcified Tissue International. no.76: pp 243-48.

Hile E, Studenski S. 2007. Instability and falls. In: Duthie EH, Katz PR, Malone ML, eds. Practice of geriatrics 4th ed. USA: Elsevier. pp 195-218.

Carpino, Chris. 2007. New ideas in Balance and Falls Prevention 3 ed, St.Louis: Elsevier Saunders. pp 51-55

Alonso G, Elizabeth T, Hsiao W, Kunal K, Jennifer M, Wen L, Lewis F. 2001. Physical Rehabilitation Outcome Measures. 2nd ed. Hamilton, Ontario, Canada: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. pp 341-342.

Leiper W. 2001. Balance decrements in older persons: Effects of age and disease. In: Masdeu JC, Sudarsky L, Leiper W (Editor). Philadelphia: Lippicott-Raven. pp 79-89.

Nugroho D. 2008. Panduan Gerontologi Tinjauan dari Berbagai Aspek. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. hal 65-67.

Wolsfon T. 2002. Reliability of the Dynamic Gait Index in people with vestibular disorders. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 84. pp 1528-33.

Diterbitkan
2018-06-01
Bagian
Articles
Abstrak viewed = 470 times
PDF (English) downloaded = 324 times

##plugins.generic.recommendByAuthor.heading##