PLACE ATTACHMENT BASED URBAN REFORM AS TOURISM POTENTIAL OF KAMPONG SEMUT

Putu Bulan Ratna Anggraeni; Fery Asta Wibowo

doi:10.22225/undagi.7.2.1565.48-55

Putu Bulan Ratna Anggraeni Department of Architecture, Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology
Fery Asta Wibowo Department of Architecture, Sepuluh Nopember Institute of Technology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22225/undagi.7.2.1565.48-55

Keywords: community, urban village, place attachment, urban analysis

Abstract

Tourism activities can never be separated from the history of a city and the influence of the development of the city itself. Aspects of tourism are very dependent on culture and public understanding of a tourist attraction in a city. Kampong Semut is one of the historical relics of the city of Surabaya which has the potential to become a tourist facility. The potential is due to the fact that Kampong Semut has a potential in the form of community attachment to the location. The community's attachment to a Kampong Semut, changing the form and function of the village itself from a large-scale activity center to an urban village that is not conserved. The purpose of this study is to understand more deeply the place attachments that exist in Kampong Semut and see what potential can be developed back into a tourism potential to be able to return the Kampong Semut to its former glory. This study uses an urban analysis method to see the shape of the city and the layers of the city in Kampong Semut to see the changes brought by the people in Kampong Semut to the place attachments.

References

Altman, I. & Low, S. (1992). Place attachment, 1st edition. Plenum Press, New York.

Bonaiuto, M., Aiello, A., Perugini, M., Bonnes, M., Ercolani, A. P. (1999). Multidimesional Perception of Residential Environment Quality and Neighbourhood Attachment in the Urban Environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4). P.331-352.

Bonaiuto, M., Bonnes, M., & Continisio, M. (2004). Neighborhood Evaluation within A Multi-place Perspective on Urban Activities. Environ. Behav., 36. P.41â€“69.

Brown, B.B., Altman, I., & Werner, C.M. (2012). International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home: Place Attachment, Elsevier, Amsterdam.

Cheshmehzangi, A. (2012). Identity and Public Realm. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 50. P.307-317.

Darjosanjoto, E.T.S. & Nugroho, S. (2015). Design Criteria for Open Space at the Riverbank Area in Kampung Wonorejo Timur. International Journal of Education and Research, 3(4). P.417-426.

Dahl, M.S. & Sorenson, O. (2009). The Embedded Entrepreneur: European Management Review, Palgrave Macmillan.

Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S. and Brown, C. (2011), â€œThe social dimension of sustainable development: defining urban social sustainabilityâ€, Sustainable Development, Vol. 19 No. 5, P.289-300.

Lee, J., Kyle, G., & Scott, D. (2012). The mediating effect of place attachment on the relationship between festival satisfaction and loyalty to the festival hosting destination. Journal of Travel Research, 51(6). P.754â€“767.

Moulay, A., Ujang, N. & Said, I. (2017). Legibility of Neighborhood Parks as A Predictor for Enhancedsocial Interaction Towards Social Sustainability. Cities 61. P.58-64.

Ramkissoon, H. (2016). Place Satisfaction, Place Attachment and Quality of Life: Development of A Conceptual Framework for Island Destinations. Sustainable Island Tourism: Competitiveness and Quality of Life. P.106-116.

Scanell, L. & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining Place Attachment: A Tripartite Organizing Framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, (30). P.1-10.

Ujang, N. (2012). Place Attachment and Continuity of Urban Place Identity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 49(2). P.156â€“167.

Ujang, N. (2016). Affective Perception of Place: Attachment to Kuala Lumpur Historical Urban Places. Proceedings of Open House International, 41(2). P. 95-101.

Veasna, S., Wu, W., & Huang, C. (2013). The Impact of Destination Source Credibility: The Mediating Effect of Destination Attachment on Destination Image. Tourism Management, 36. P.511â€“526.