Legal Protection for Victims of Illicit Banks Under the Guise of Cooperatives Requires Indonesian Government Intervention
Abstrak
Illicit Bank under the guise of a Cooperative is a form of illegal investment in Indonesia. Cooperatives that do not carry out their principles and functions according to the Cooperative Regulation Law no. 25 of 1992, collecting public funds illegally, and ultimately failing to return the funds deposited by its members is an indication of Illicit Bank. The Indosurya Cipta Savings and Loans Cooperative was an illicit bank under the guise of a cooperative that was found as the biggest fraud case in Indonesia, affected 23,000 victims and a loss of 106 trillion rupiahs. KSP Indosurya Cipta was charged with Article 46 Paragraph 1 of Law no. 10 of 1998 concerning Amendments to Law no. 7 of 1992 concerning Banking and Money Laundering. Normative legal research was conducted to analyze the importance of the government's role in providing legal protection for tens of thousands of victims of this illicit bank. After the court decision to refund the victim's deposit funds through the homologation process two years ago failed again, the confiscation of criminal assets (TPPU) of the Founder and two other perpetrators requires certainty and different legal settlements in order to compensate the victims, not only as evidence to punish the perpetrators of the crime. The intervention of the Government of Indonesia and related agencies is important to restore the confidence of the Indonesian people in the existence of the law and the protection of investment in the legality of legal entities such as cooperatives.
Referensi
Afifudin. (2018). Monopoli Bisnis Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Di Tinjau Dari Undang-Undang No. 25 Tahun 1992 Tentang Perkoperasian. USM Law Review, 1(1), 109.
Alatas, M. B. (2022). Teten sebut 8 koperasi gagal bayar lakukan perjanjian damai. Antaranews.Com.
Banjarnahor, R. U., Sidabalok, J., & Suhardin, Y. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pengurus Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Dalam Hal Koperasi Gagal Bayar Terhadap Simpanan Berjangka Milik Anggota. Fiat Iustitia, 2(3), 307.
Chairanie, R., & Afriana, A. (2021). Kedudukan Anggota Koperasi Simpan Pinjam Sebagai Kreditor Pada Koperasi Simpan Koperasi Pandawa Mandiri Group Yang Telah Dinyatakan Pailit Atas Disitanya Boedel Pailit Oleh Negara. Panji Keadilan Ilmiah, 4(1).
Darmonodiharjo, D. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 (Vol. 3). Balai Pustaka.
Fibriani, R. (2022). Tinjauan Hukum Kepailitan Koperasi Saat Gagal Bayar Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 7(1), 98.
HS, S., & Nurbani, E. S. (2017). Penerapan teori hukum pada penelitian tesis dan disertasi. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Lumbantobing, J. P. (2022). Ekonomi Koperasi Medan. Universitas HKBP Nommensen.
Mulhadi. (2017). Hukum Perusahaan Bentuk-bentuk Badan Usaha di Indonesia. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Pangastuti, T. C. (2022). Kasus Gagal Bayar KSP Indosurya Hancurkan Citra Koperasi, Uang Anggota Harus Segera Dikembalikan. Investor Daily.
Partomo, T. (2008). Ekonomi Koperasi. Ghalia Indonesia.
Sari, F. (2018). Sebelum gagal bayar terkuak, Kemenkop temukan penyimpangan KSP I. Indosurya.
Supramono, G. (2020). Hukuman Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Kencana.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
The author can hold the copyright without any restriction under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
Abstrak viewed = 111 times
PDF (English) downloaded = 144 times
