Corruption: Working Hasn’t Completed

  • Gde Made Swardhana Faculty of Law, Universitas Udayana
  • I Nyoman Sukandia Faculty of Law, Universitas Warmadewa

Abstrak

This article discusses problems of corruption which until now hasn’t been completed in its eradication process. Every effort is made to find both internal and external causes in order to get the solution. The problem that is studied sociologically is, why is corruption incomplete? If corruption isn’t yet complete, and work isn’t finished yet, then how can work be completed? Understanding Corruption can be called work is complete, must be understood from the anti-corruption values and principles contained therein. It’s include honesty, independence, discipline, responsibility, hard work, simple, courage, and justice. It’s need to be applied by each individual to be able to overcome external factors so that corruption doesn’t occur. To prevent the occurrence of external factors, in addition to having it, each individual needs to deeply understand the anti-corruption principles of accountability, transparency, fairness, policy, and policy control. Therefore the relationship between anti-corruption principles and values is an inseparable unity. Success or failure to solve the problem of corruption is expected in the legal system that makes the handle in solving corruption cases, namely strengthening the legal structure, legal substance and legal culture of the community.

Referensi

Ali, A. (2005). Keterpurukan Hukum di Indonesia Penyebab dan Solusinya. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Arief, B. N. (1998). Beberapa Aspek Kebijakan Penegakan dan Pengembangan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Atmasasmita, R. (2004). Strategi dan Kebijakan Pemberantasan Korupsi Pasca-Konvensi PBB Menentang Korupsi Tahun 2003. In Menjelang Pengadilan Anti-Korupsi di Indonesia. British Council.

Bahiej, A. (2003). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Telaah atas Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Yogyakarta: kajian run Pusat Studi dan Konsultasi Hukum (PSKH) Fakultas Syari’ah IAIN Sunan Kalijaga.

Budiarjo, M. (1997). Dasar Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Djaja, E. (2010). Memberantas Korupsi Bersama KPK (Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Eigen, P. (1999). Buku Panduan Transparacy International Pengembangan Sistem Inegritas Nasional.

Fletcher, G. P. (1985). A Transaction Theory of Crime? Columbia Law Review, 85(5), 921–930. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1122457?seq=1

Goesniadhie, K. (2006). Harmonisasi Hukum Dalam Perspekf Perundang-Undangan (Lex Spesialis Suatu Masalah). Surabaya: JP Books.

Hartiningsih, M. (2011). Korupsi yang Memiskinkan. Jakarta: Buku Kompas. Retrieved from https://perpustakaan.kpk.go.id/index.php?h=show_detail&id=4364

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi. (2011). Pendidikan Anti Korupsi Untuk Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI Direktorat Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi.

Mustafa, M. (2013). Suap Menyuap dan Mafia Peradilan di Indonesia: Telaah kriminologis. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 42(1), 1–5. Retrieved from https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/view/5854

Peters, A. A. G., & Siswosoebroto, K. (1988). Hukum dan Perkembangan Sosial Buku Teks Sosiologi Hukum. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan. Retrieved from http://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20105604

Pramono, A. (2013). Kekuasaan dan Hukum Dalam Perkuatan Pemberantasan Korupsi. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 42(1), 105–113. Retrieved from https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/mmh/article/view/5866

Soedarto. (1986). Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia. Jakarta: Bina Cipta.

Varia. (1999). Peradilan, No. 122 Tahun 1999.

Wahyudi, S. T. (2012). Problematika Penerapan Pidana Mati Dalam Konteks Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 1(2), 207–234. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/JHP.1.2.2012.207-234

Diterbitkan
2020-08-07
Bagian
Articles
Abstrak viewed = 192 times
PDF (English) downloaded = 328 times