Executive Law Review in an Effort to Accelerate Program Ease of Doing Business
Abstrak
Indonesia is currently still ranked below in attracting domestic and foreign investment because the existing regulations are not conducive. Many contributing factors, including central government regulations that are inconsistent in their implementation in the regions and the linkages of various regulations that support investment (for example: employment, land, credit, contracts, taxation, cross-country trade, business entities, bankruptcy and etc.), updates adapted to the era of free trade and fair business competition. One of the Government's efforts to improve the investment climate is to implement the Ease of Doing Business program that has been carried out by other countries in various parts of the world. This study aims to carry out the executive law review in an effort to accelerate program ease of doing. This study uses normative juridical research methods by examining various regulations and policies of the Central Government and local governments with a statute approach. The results of this study shows that there are three policies from the Government in the form of revoked, amended or maintained by the regulations referred to in 5 (five) dimensions in the evaluation of regulations, namely the accuracy of the type of legislation, the potential for disharmony in regulations, clarity of the formulation of regulations, assessment of conformity of norms, and effectiveness implementing statutory arrangements. These five dimensions in the Ease of Doing Business program are expected to provide synergy from existing regulations so that foreign investors can look at Indonesia as a country that is comfortable in investing and can provide benefits for businesses that are invested in Indonesia.
Referensi
Asshiddiqie, J. (2010). Konstitusi Ekonomi. Jakarta: Kompas Media Nusantara.
Canare, T. (2018). The effect of ease of doing business on firm creation. Annals of Economics and Finance, 19(2), 555–584. Retrieved from http://aeconf.com/Articles/Nov2018/aef190207.pdf
Fibra, A. (2018). The Ease of Doing Business in Indonesia. Journal of Business Strategy and Execution, 10(1), 32–51. Retrieved from https://journal.binus.ac.id/index.php/JBSE/article/view/5174
Hoesein, Z. A. (2009). Judicial Review Di Mahkamah Agung Tiga Dekade Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undang. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Instruksi Presiden Nomor: 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pengambilan, Pengawasan dan Pengendalian Kebijaksanaan di Tingkat Kementrian Negara dan Pemerintahan
Lotulung, P. effendi. (1999). Laporan Akhir Dan Evaluasi Hukum tentang Wewenang Mahkamah Agung dalam Melaksanakan Hak uji Materil (judicial review). Jakarta: embinaan Hukum Departemen hukum Perundang-undangan RI.
Napitupulu. (1975). Joint Ventures di Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor: 91 Tahun 2017 Tentang Percepatan Pelaksanaan Berusaha.
Salmande, A. (2011). Praktik Legislative Review dan Judicial Review di Indonesia. Retrieved from Hukumonline.com website: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/cl1105/praktik-legislative-review--judicial-review-di-republik-indonesia
Shidarta, A. (2018). Tantangan dan Hambatan Analisis dan Evaluasi Hukum. Retrieved from https://business-law.binus.ac.id/2018/02/21/hambatan-dan-tantangan-analisis-dan-evaluasi-peraturan-perundang-undangan/
Supancana, I. B. R. (2017). Sebuah Gagasan Tentang Grand Design Reformasi Regulasi Indonesia. Retrieved from https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=992462
Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945.
Undang-undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.
Usihen, M. (2016). Kebijakan Analisis Dan Evaluasi Hukum. Retrieved From Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum Dan Ham website: https://www.bphn.go.id/data/documents/dispub_partisipasi_publik_20160728_min_usihen.pdf
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
The author can hold the copyright without any restriction under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
![](/public/statistik.png)
![](/public/pdf.png)