The Constitutional Power Of The Executive in The Age of Rule of Law: A Comparative Study on Malaysia and Indonesia
Abstract
The rule of law sets as an important principle entrenched in the Constitution of Malaysia and Indonesia. This principle stand as a guardian against abuse of power by the government as nobody shall be above the law. This paper examines the practices of the executive power relating to decision-making policy, execution of power and enforcement activities in Malaysia and Indonesia. It also analyses how the executive branch perfoms the powers in accordance to the rule of law. It mainly focuses on the institutional framework of the head of the government and head of state. The analysis allows for identifications of issues and proposals on the enhancement of the executive branch in both countries that would increase the quality of state administration as well as promoting the rule of law. The study adopts a normative method where the fundamental discussions are based on normative approach with content analysis approach on the constitutional and legal provisions, legal cases, circular and directive. The data acquired through doctrinal study is supported by semi-structured interviews with respondents that have been selected through purposive approach. This article concludes that the executive branch plays important roles in promoting the rule of law in both countries. The Constitution, in this case, provides constitutional limitation for the institutional branch of the executive to perform its powers. In the age of rule of law, the executive powers has to be limited. There is no power without limits. The laws has to provide a clear legal direction and reliable mechanism of checks and balances to govern the exercise of the executive powers.
References
Abdul Ghani Ali @ Ahmad (2001)
Aun, W, M.(2003). Hickling’s Malaysian Public Law, 2nd edition.Selangor, Malaysia,Longman.
Addruse, R, A. (1998). Conduct Unbecoming: In Defence of Tun Mohd. Salleh Abas (the Former Lord President) of the Supreme Court of Malaysia.Walrus, University of Michigan Press.
Aliran.(1987). Reflections on the Malaysian Constitution. Penang, Aliran Kesedaran Negara.
Asshidiqie, A. (2006). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara Jilid II, Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia.
Asshiddiqie, J.(2006). Perkembangan dan Konsolidasi Lembaga Negara Pasca Reformasi, Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Balakrishnan v KP Perkhidmatan Awam (1981)
Bari, A.(2003). The Malaysian Constitution-A Critical Introduction. Kuala Lumpur: Other Press.
Braun, S, K. (2008). Indonesia’s Presidential Democracy in Comparison with Malaysia’s System. Friedrich Naumann Foundation. http://www.fnfasia.org (accessed on 20/10/2011).
Candland, C., & Nurjanah, S.(2011). Indonesia after Wahid: the New Authoritarianism, The Royal Institute of International Affairs. Briefing Paper No. 28.
Chin, J., & Welsh, B.(2018). Special Issue Introduction: The 2018 Malaysian General Election: The Return of Mahathir and the Exit of UMNO. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs. 37, issue 3. Pp. 63.
Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim v Public Prosecutor(2000)
Faruqi, S, S.(2008). Document of Destiny, The Constitution of Federation of Malaysia.Kuala Lumpur: Star Publications (Malaysia) Berhad.
Faruqi, S, S.(2014).Revisiting Ministerial Responsibility. http://www.malaysianbar.org.my/legal/general_news/revisiting_ministerial_responsibility.html.
Faruqi, S, S.(2019). Our Constitution.KFederal Constitution (Malaysia) Constitutional Proposals for the Federation of Malaya. (1957). http://year006.tripod.com/constitutions_proposal_malaya_1957_searchable.pdf.
uala Lumpur: Sweet & Maxwell.
Feith, H.(2007). The Decline of Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia. Jakarta, Equinox Publishing, 1st Edition, 2007.
Fernando, J, M.(2014). Defending the monarchy: The Malay Rulers and the Making of the Malayan Constitution, 1956-1957. VARIA, 88, pp. 149-167.
Francis, F., & Dressel, B.(2005). Facing the Perils of Presidentialism?: Challenge and Change in East Asia. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Journal of Democracy, 16, No. 2, pp.102-116.
Hashim, M, S.(1976). An Introduction to the Constitution of Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Ibrahim bin Johari, Government printer.
Harding, A.(1996). Law, Government and the Constitution in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Malayan Law Journal Sdn. Bhd.
Ibrahim, A., & Joned, A.(1995). The Malaysian Legal System. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.
ICG International Crisis Group.(2011). Indonesia’s Presidential Crisis. ICG Asia Briefing Paper, Jakartaâ€Brussels.
Jakarta post.(2012, April 26). Analyst says health minister’s resignation proves flaw in Cabinet selection. http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2012/04/26/analystâ€saysâ€healthâ€ministerâ€sresignationâ€provesâ€flawâ€cabinetâ€selection.html.
Indrayana, D. (2008). Indonesian Constitutional Reform 1999â€2002: an Evaluation of Constitution†Making in Transition. Jakarta, Kompas Book Publishing.
Karam Singh (1969).
King, B, A. (2004). Empowering the Presidency: Interest and Perceptions in Indonesia’s Constitutional Reforms 1999â€2002.[Unpublished Master Dissertation in Political Science], the Ohio State University.
Lee, H, P.(2017). Constitutional Conflicts in Contemporary Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.
Lee, H, P. (1993).Hereditary Rulers and Legal Immunities in Malaysia. University of Tasmania Law Review, 12, no.2, pp. 324
Lee, S., & Trindade.(1986). The Constitution of Malaysia: Further Perspective and Developments. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D, E.(2003). Presidents and the politics of agency design: political insulation in the United States government Bureaucracy. California: Stanford University Press.
Masum, A.(2012).The Doctrine Of Ministerial Responsibility In Malaysia :Theory And Practice In A New Regime Of Parliamentary accountability. Malayan Law Journal, 4, clv.
McCarty, N & Razaghian, R.(1999). Advice and Consent: Senate Responses to Executive Branch Nominations 1885 1996. American Journal of Political Science, 43, no. 4, pp. 1122-1143.
Nadzri, M, M, N.(2018). The 14th General Election, the Fall of Barisan Nasional, and Political Development in Malaysia, 1957–2018. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs,37, issue 3, pp. 150.
Ruling on Anwar's a Appeal on Dismissal from Cabinet Posts at Later Date (Update).The Star (December, 3 2009)https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2009/12/03/ruling-on-anwars-appeal-on-dismissal-from-cabinet-posts-at-later-date-update#6MvppzU1i7ZQyXXH.
Schneier, E.(2005).The Role of Constitutionâ€Building Processes in Democratization: Case Study Indonesia. International IDEA Democracy†building and Conflict Management (DCM), Sweden. http://www.idea.int/conflict, 21/10/2011).
Sheridan & Groves.(1964). The Constitution of Malaysia. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 13, no. 4, pp. 1349-1367.
Sherlock, S. (2011). Indonesia’s New Government: Stability at Last?. Australia, Department of the Parliamentary Library: Current Issues Brief No. 4 2001 02. http://www.aph.gov.au/library on 23/10/2011.
Soewoto, M.(2004). Pembaharuan Ketatanegaraan Melalui Perubahan Konstitusi. Malang, Asosiasi Pengajar HTNHAM Jatim Intrans.
Stephen Kalong Ningkan v Tun Abang Haji Openg (No. 2) (1967)
Stephen Kalong Ningkan v Government (1968)
Tan, K., & Li-ann, T, (2009).Constitutional Law in Malaysia and Singapore. 3rd edition. Singapore: Lexis-Nexis.
Teh Cheng Poh v. PP (1979)
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945(Indonesia).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
The author can hold the copyright without any restriction under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
Abstract viewed = 1469 times
PDF downloaded = 3359 times
