The Role of the Curator as a Mediator in the Settlement of a Bankruptcy Case
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to look for the efforts that can be made by debtors to have their cases of bankruptcy resolved peacefully and to examine the procedures to be undertaken by Curator to achieve peace in the efforts of settling the case of so bankruptcy. This type of research is normative legal research done with a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach to legislation. The legal materials were collected by applying the method of library research. The results of data analysis show that in order to achieve peace in the settlement of the cases of bankruptcy, a a debtor needs to immediately make a rational peace plan that is acceptable to the creditors. In achieving this, the curator takes a key role to convice the debtors to make a good decision in preparing a plan of peace. The implication is the prepapred peace plan should be made sure capable of assuring the creditors to take. Thus, it is the curator’s responsibility to also convince the creditor to accept the plan of peace made by the bankrupt creditors. Keywords: Bankruptcy; CuratorReferences
Altman, E. ., & Hotchkiss, E. (2010). Corporate financial distress and bankruptcy: Predict and avoid bankruptcy, analyze and invest in distressed debt. John Wiley & Sons., 289.
Anggela, S. (2014). Peran Hakim Pengawas dalam Menangani Kurator yang Merugikan Harta Pailit Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004. Privat Law, 2(5), 85–93.
Baird, D. ., & Rasmussen, R. K. (2002). The end of bankruptcy. Stanford Law Review, 751–789.
Blum, B. . (2006). Bankruptcy and debtor/creditor: examples and explanations. Aspen Publishers Online.
Buccola, V. ., & Keller, A. . (2010). Credit Bidding and the Design of Bankruptcy Auctions. Geo. Mason L. Rev, 18, 99.
Denzin, N. K. (2008). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Sage, 3.
Ginting, R. (2004). Kewenangan Tunggal Bank Indonesia Dalam Kepailitan Bank. Buletin Hukum Perbankan Dan Kebanksentralan, 2(2), 1–17.
Habibie, R. (2017). Parent Company Bankruptcy and Consequnces for Independence Subsidiaries. Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, 2(1).
Herman, B., & Guzman, M. (2016). Towards a multilateral framework for recovery from sovereign insolvency. Too little, too late: the quest to resolve sovereign debt crises.
Jackson, T. ., & Scott, K. . (2015). Making Failure Feasible: How Bankruptcy Reform Can End Too Big to Fail. Hoover Press.
Joseph, M. (2014). Debt to society: Accounting for life under capitalism. U of Minnesota Press.
Kamlani, D. . (2008). The four faces of power in sovereign debt restructuring: Explaining bargaining outcomes between debtor states and private creditors since 1870. London School of Economics and Political Science.
Kilborn, J. J. (2005). Behavioral Economics, Overindebtedness & Comparative Consumer Bankruptcy: Searching for Causes and Evaluating Solutions. The John Marshall Institutional Repository. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.690826
Klapper, L. (2005). The role of factoring for financing small and medium enterprises. The World Bank.
Lomax, L. . (1994). Alternative Dispute Resolution in Bankruptcy: Rule 9019 and Bankruptcy Mediation Programs. Am. Bankr, 68, 55.
Lopucki, L. ., & Doherty, J. . (2004). The determinants of professional fees in large bankruptcy reorganization cases. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1(1), 111–141.
Martin, N. (2005). The role of history and culture in developing bankruptcy and insolvency systems: the perils of legal transplantation. BC Int’l & Comp. L. Rev, 28, 1.
Mooney Jr, C. . (2014). The Bankruptcy Code’s Safe Harbors for Settlement Payments and Securities Contracts: When Is Safe Too Safe. Tex. Int’l LJ, 49, 245.
Nelson, M. (2016). Bankruptcy: If at first you don’t succeed. Australian Restructuring Insolvency & Turnaround Association Journal, 28(1), 18.
Oprea, C. (2017). The end of the curator: on curatorial acts as collective production of knowledge. Corina Oprea.
Porter, K. (2010). Life after debt: Understanding the credit restraint of bankruptcy debtors. Am. Bankr. Inst. L. Rev, 18, 1.
Pottow, J. . (2005). Greed and Pride in International Bankruptcy: The Problems of and Proposed Solutions to Local Interests. Mich. L. Rev, 104, 1899.
Rajak, H. (2011). Determining the insolvent estate–A comparative analysis. International Insolvency Review, 20(1), 1–28.
Sembiring, S. (2017). Eksistensi Kurator Dalam Pranata Hukum Kepalitan. Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 3(1), 91–110.
Suwardi, S., & Boediningsih, W. (2018). Bankruptcy Statement And The Law Consequences. The Spirit Of Society Journal, 1(2), 145–158.
Thompson, E. . (2004). The reconstruction of southern debtors: bankruptcy after the civil war. University of Georgia Press.
Van Hoecke, M. ed. (2011). Methodologies of legal research: which kind of method for what kind of discipline? Bloomsbury Publishing.
Van Kesteren, J., Adriaanse, J., & Van der Rest, J. . (2017). The Story behind Bankruptcy: When Business Gets Personal. QUT L. Rev, 17, 57.
Vriesendorp, R. . (2008). The Righteous Bankruptcy Trustee: The influence of creditors on the appointment of a bankruptcy trustee from a Netherlands perspective. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad, 11(1), 1–18.
Wessels, B., Markell, B. A., & Kilborn, J. J. (2009). International cooperation in bankruptcy and insolvency matters. Oxford University Press.
Wood, P. R. (2007). Principles of international insolvency. Sweet & Maxwell., 1.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
The author can hold the copyright without any restriction under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)