The Evaluation Of Independent Norm Text And Impartial Judge On The Constitutional Court Of Indonesia
Abstract
In this paper, the Judge of the Constitutional Court is the authority of judicial power to enforce law and justice as a guardian and interpreter of the constitution. The method used in this research is legal research. The result of this research is that the evaluation of the independent and impartial texts of Indonesian constitutional court judges can be measured from procedural independent, legal fomal-empirical independent, and empirically independent either according to national legal instruments or international instruments. Meanwhile, the supervision of the Constitutional Court judges is devided into two supervisory models. These are that it is supervised by the Ethics Council of the Constitutional Court and by the Honorary Council of Constitutional Justices. For the external supervision, the court is supervised by the Constitutional Court with the Judicial Commission philosophically forming the Ethics Council to perform the (control function) to the judges of the Constitutional Court in order to avoid deviation of legal norms by the judges of the Constitutional Court Indonesia.References
Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia;
Adonara, F. F. (2015). Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim dalam Memutus Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi Principles of Fredom of Justice in Decidene The Case as a Constitutional Mandate. Jurnal Konstitusi, 12(2).
Asshiddiqie, J. (2006). Constitutional Testing Models in Various Countries. Jakarta: Constitution Press.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2014). Constitutional Ethics and Ethics Trial. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hamzah, A. (2001). Criminal Procedure Code in Indonesia revised edition, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Kelsen, H. (1973). General Theory of law and state. New York: Russell & Russell.
Law Number 24 Year 2003 regarding the Constitutional Court;
Law Number 8 Year 2011 regarding Amendment to Law Number 24 of 2003 on the Constitutional Court;
Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 37 Year 2008 About Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia;
Law Number 48 Year 2009 regarding Judicial Power; Regulation of the Constitutional Court Number 2 Year 2013 concerning the Constitutional Justice Ethics Council;
Lotulung, P. E. (2003). Kebebasan Hakim dalam Sistem Penegakan Hukum. SEMINAR PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM NASIONAL VIII, 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2012.270
Manan, B. (2002). Independent and Responsible Judicial Power". Jakarta: LeIP.
Manan, B. (2011). Welcoming the Fajar Autonomy Region. Yogyakarta: Law Study Center Faculty of Law UII.
Nadir. (2012). Dilemma of Constitutional Court Decision VS Political Strength In Impeachment of President. Constitutional Journal Constitutional Court, 9(2).
Nadir. (2013). Reconstruction of the Constitutional Court’s Judiciary Through Text Approach. Indonesian Legislation Journal, 10(3).
Perpu Number 1 of 2013 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 24 Year 2003 regarding the Constitutional Court;
Regulation of the Constitutional Court Number 2 Year 2014 concerning the Honorary Board of the Constitutional Court,
Russell, P. H., & O’Brien, D. M. (1985). Judicial Independence In The Age of Democracy, Critical Perspectives from Around the World, Constitutionalism & Democracy Series. Toronto Canada: McGraw-Hill.
Shaman, J. M. (1996). The Impartial Judge: Detachment or Passion. DePaul Law. Review., 45(3), 605.
Stafanus, K. Y. (1998). The Development of State Administration Power: The Dimension of Political Law Approach to Presidential Power According to the 1945 Constitution. Yogyakarta: Atma Jaya University.
Utrecht, E. (1986). Pengantar hukum adimnistrasi negara Indonesia. Surabaya Pustaka Tinta Emas.
Wignjosoebroto, S. (n.d.). Legal Research: A Tipology. Indonesian Society Magazine.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
The author can hold the copyright without any restriction under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)