Authority and Procedures for Determination of the Foundation Managers
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to find out who is authorized and how the procedure of determination the foundation managers. The method used in this research is the method of normative legal research with statute approach, conceptual approach and case approach. Research location in Denpasar Bali. Sources of legal material are legislation, and cases faced by the DJ foundation. How to collect legal materials is to use the card system. The result of the research is the authority to determination the foundation managers by the foundation trustees and the procedures of determination the foundation managers begins with the supervision conducted by the supervisor of the foundation, followed by the temporary dismissal, then proceed with clarification meeting from the managers of foundation, which can lead to the determination of the foundation managers.References
Barkema, H. G., Chen, X. P., George, G., Luo, Y., & Tsui, A. S. (2015). West meets East: New concepts and theories. Academy of Management Journal, 58(2).
Barton, A. (2005). Professional accounting standards and the public sector—a mismatch. Abacus, 41(2).
Becht, M., Bolton, P., & Röell, A. (2003). Corporate governance and control. In Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Vol. 1, pp. 1-109). Elsevier.
Bederman, D. J. (2008). The Classical Foundations of the American Constitution: Prevailing Wisdom. Cambridge University Press.
Bräutigam, D. (2000). Aid dependence and governance (Vol. 1). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Byczek, C. (2011). Blessings for all? Community-based ecotourism in Bali between global, national, and local interests-a case study. ASEAS-Österreichische Zeitschrift für Südostasienwissenschaften, 4(1).
Callison, J. W., & Vestal, A. W. (2010). The L3C Illusion: Why Low-Profit Limited Liability Companies Will Not Stimulate Socially Optimal Private Foundation Investment in Entrepreneurial Ventures. Vt. L. Rev.
Craig, P., & De Búrca, G. (2011). EU law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press.
Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella Jr, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of management review, 28(3).
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3).
Eisenberg, M. A. (2017). Legal models of management structure in the modern corporation: Officers, directors, and accountants. In Corporate Governance (pp. 103-167). Gower.
Enriques, L., & Hertig, G. (2010). The governance of financial supervisors: Improving responsiveness to market developments.
Fishman, J. J., & Schwarz, S. (1995). Nonprofit organizations. Westbury, New York: The Foundation Press, Inc.
Fosdick, R. B. (2017). The story of the Rockefeller Foundation. Routledge.
Ghoshal, S. (2005). Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management learning & education, 4(1).
Gijlstra, D. J. (Ed.). (2013). Leading cases and materials on the law of the European Communities. Springer.
Hales, C. (2005). Rooted in supervision, branching into management: Continuity and change in the role of firstâ€line manager. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3).
Hall, A., & Nordqvist, M. (2008). Professional management in family businesses: Toward an extended understanding. Family Business Review, 21(1).
Hogg, W. R. (2002). Ecumenical foundations: A history of the International Missionary Council and its nineteenth-century background. Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Hopt, K. J., Walz, W. R., Von Hippel, T., & Then, V. (2006). The European foundation: A new legal approach. Cambridge University Press.
Ihsan, H., & Hameed Hj. Mohamed Ibrahim, S. (2011). WAQF accounting and management in Indonesian WAQF institutions: The cases of two WAQF foundations. Humanomics, 27(4).
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational researcher, 33(7).
Kiger, J. C. (2000). Philanthropic foundations in the twentieth century (Vol. 72). Greenwood Publishing Group.
Kirkos, E., Spathis, C., & Manolopoulos, Y. (2007). Data mining techniques for the detection of fraudulent financial statements. Expert systems with applications, 32(4).
Kubler, F. (2004). A Shifting Paradigm of European Company Law. Colum. J. Eur. L., 11, 219.
Linck, J. S., Netter, J. M., & Yang, T. (2008). The determinants of board structure. Journal of financial economics, 87(2).
Machold, S., & Farquhar, S. (2013). Board task evolution: A longitudinal field study in the UK. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21(2).
McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of management journal, 38(1).
Menzel, D. C. (2014). Ethics management for public administrators: Building organizations of integrity. Routledge.
Nicklin, J. M., & Roch, S. G. (2009). Letters of recommendation: Controversy and consensus from expert perspectives. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17(1).
Parmar, I. (2012). Foundations of the American century: The Ford, Carnegie, and Rockefeller Foundations in the rise of American power. Columbia University Press.
Qu, C. Z. (2003). The doctrinal basis of the trust principles in China's trust law. Real Property, Probate and Trust Journal.
Riahi-Belkaoui, A. (2004). Accounting theory. Cengage Learning EMEA.
Samól, K. (2016). One-or Two-tier Board System? A Comparative Analysis of the British and Polish Systems of Corporate Governance. European Company Law, 13(2).
Siddiqi, S., Masud, T. I., Nishtar, S., Peters, D. H., Sabri, B., Bile, K. M., & Jama, M. A. (2009). Framework for assessing governance of the health system in developing countries: gateway to good governance. Health policy, 90(1).
Van der Ploeg, T. J. (1995). Supervisory powers relating to foundations: A comparative analysis of foundation law. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 6(3).
Wheeler, R. R. (2010). Practical Impediments to Structural Reform and the Promise of Third Branch Analytic Methods: A Reply to Professors Baum and Legomsky. Duke Law Journal, 59(8).
Xie, B., Davidson III, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of corporate finance, 9(3).
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
The author can hold the copyright without any restriction under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)
Abstract viewed = 209 times
PDF downloaded = 173 times
