Amicus Curiae In The Criminal Evidence System In Indonesia

  • Cesaltina Angela Soares Dili University
  • I Made Agus Mahendra Iswara Kejaksaan Negeri Gersik, Jawa Timur
DOI: https://doi.org/10.22225/scj.2.1.1002.67-72
Keywords: Amicus Curiae, Hukum Acara Pidana, Sistem Pembuktian Pidana

Abstract

The Criminal Procedure Code in Indonesia is not known to other parties, other than to law enforcement officers who represent victims (Investigators or Public Prosecutors), suspects (Legal advisors) and Judges. However, in civil law, there are known other parties who are interested in entering into a dispute known as intervient. The idea of a third party that has an interest in the realm of civil law is made into the forerunner of a third party in criminal procedural law in Indonesia. Against such conditions in criminal law known as the term "Amicus Curiae" or often referred to as "Friends of Court" or in Indonesian is known as "Friends of the Court". Regarding how the existence and opportunities for the implementation of "Amicus Curiae" in the Criminal Procedure Code in Indonesia in the future that will come will be assessed by normative methods with conceptual, historical, and legislative approaches. Keywords: Amicus Curiae; Criminal Procedure Code; Criminal Proof System

References

Amicus Curiae (Amicus Brief) Perkara Penodaan Agama Sdr. Basuki Tjahaja Purnama Alias Ahok. (2017). Lembaga Bantuan Hukum (LBH) Jakarta.

Aminah, S. (2014). Menjadi Sahabat Keadilan Panduan Menyusun Amicus Brief. Jakarta: The Indonesia Legal Resource Centre (ILRC).

Delik Kesusilaan dan Kemerdekaan Pers dalam Perkara Malajah Playboy di Indonesia (Amicus Brief). (2011). Institute for Criminal Justice Reform-ICRJ, 3.

Eddy, O. S. H. (2016). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Institute for Criminal Justice Reform-ICRJ, Amicus Curiae Dalam Kasus Florence Sihombing Pada Perkara Nomor 382/Pid.Sus/2014/PN.Yyk Di Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta. (2011). Institute for Criminal Justice Reform, 4–11.

Januardy, A. F., & Prayogy, U. S. (2016). Tak Semahal Tambang Amicus Curiae dalam Kasus Pembunuhan Berencana Salim Kancil & Tosan. LBH Jakarta.

Jonas, O. (2015). The Participation of the Amicus Curiae Institution in Human Rights Litigation in Botswana and South Africa: A Tale of Two Jurisdictions. Journal of African Law, 59(2), 329–354.

Marin, P., Garces, L. M., Miksch, K., Yun, J. T., & Horn, C. L. (2018). Use of extra-legal sources in Amicus Curiae briefs submitted in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 26, 38. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.26.2823

Viljoen, F., & Abebe, A. K. (2014). Amicus Curiae Participation Before Regional Human Rights Bodies in Africa. Journal of African Law, 58(1), 22–44.

Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 06/PMK/2005

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Published
2019-02-28
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2019)
Section
Articles

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download.  We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

The author can hold the copyright without any restriction under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA)

Abstract viewed = 390 times
PDF downloaded = 320 times