Nutritional Quality of Pakchong, Zanzibar and Bio Grass Harvested at Different Ages

  • Ni Ketut Mardewi Program Studi Peternakan, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Warmadewa
  • I Wayan Agus Santika Program Studi Peternakan Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Warmadewa
  • Yan Tonga Program Studi Peternakan Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Warmadewa
Keywords: Nutrition quality, grass, harvested day

Abstract

The study is intended to know the interaction between grass and cut age on the quality of grass, and knowing the type of grass and cut age best nutrients by the first - stage design method of grouping (R), a grass of the first factors (R), the grass of Zanzibar (R2), the biograss (R3), the second factor (U) of cut age: 50 days (U1), 60 days (U2), and 70 days (U3) with 3 deuteronomy. Studies have shown that there is real interaction (P <0.05) to very real (P < 0.01) between grass types and the age cut to nutrients such as water, ash, organic matter, rough protein, and rough fibers except that of coarse fat. The nutritional qualities of grass and the highest longevity of grasses and water content are produced from biograss grass at 50 days of age (R3U1), the highest ash content produced by zansibar grass with 60 days of grass And the highest concentration of crude fats from 50 days of living pakchong (R1U1) grass.

References

[1] Gunung, M. (2022). Mengenal Rumput Pakchong Sebagai Pakan Ternak. Dinas Pertanian Pemerintah Kabupaten Buleleng. https://distan.bulelengkab.go.id/mengenal-rumput-pakchong-sebagai-pakan-ternak
[2] Rashif, U. (2021). Mengenal Rumput Zanzibar, Manfaat dan Kandungannya untuk Pakan Ternak. https://peternakan.sariagri.id/70591/mengenal-rumput-zanzibar-manfaat-dan-kandungannya-untuk-pakan-ternak
[3] Elly FH, Sinaga BM, Kuntjoro SU dan Kusnadi N. (2008). Pengembangan Usaha Ternak Sapi Rakyat Melalui Integrasi Sapi-Tanaman di Sulawesi Utara. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian. Jakarta
[4] Manurung T, Sajimin, Prawiradiputra BR, Nurhayati, Sutedi E, Yuhaeni S dan Sumarto. (2001). Uji palatabilitas dan kecernaan plasma nutfah tanaman pakan ternak untuk seleksi lebih lanjut. Laporan Tahunan T.A. 2001. Bogor (ID): Balitnak Ciawi
[5] Nurhayu A, Saenap A, dan Sariubang. (2009). Induksi Beberapa Jenis Rumput Dan Leguminosa Unggul Sebagai Penyedia Hijauan Pakan Pada Lahan Kering Dataran Rendah Di Kabupaten Pinrang. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner Makasar.Makasar (ID):Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian
[6] Erleli, W .(2020). http://cybex.pertanian.go.id/mobile/artikel/96560/BUDIDAYA-RUMPUT-GAJAH/.
[7] Lounglawan,. P, Wassana Lounglawan and Wisitiporn Suksombat. (2014). Effect of Cutting Interval and Cutting Height on Yield and Chemical Composition of King Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum x Pennisetum americanum). APCBEE Procedia. 8 : 27 – 31
[8] Tessema ZK, Mihret J, Solomon M. (2010). Effect Of Defo-Liation Frequency And Cutting Height On Growth, Dry-Matter Yield And Nutritive Value Of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schumach). Grass and Forage Science 65:421–430
[9] Van Soest PJ. (1994). Nutritional Ecology Of The Ruminant. Comstock Publishing Associates, Division of Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA
[10] Budiman, I. (2021). Cara Budidaya Rumput Gajah Yang Baik dan Benar Dilengkapi Tips Untungnya Selangit
[11] Steel, R. G. D. dan J. H. Torrie. (1993). Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika. (Pendekatan Biometrik). Penerjemah B. Sumantri. Gramedia Pustaka. Utama, Jakarta.
[12] Sajimin, Kompiang IP, Supriyati, dan Suratmini NP. (2001). Penggunaan Biofertilizer Untuk Peningkatan Produktifitas Hijauan Pakan Rumput Gajah (Pennisetum Purpureum Cv Afrika) Pada Lahan Marjinal Di Subang Jawa Barat. Media Peternakan.24 (2): 46 -50
[13] Wijitphan, S., P. Lorwilai and C. Arkaseang. (2009). Effect of Cutting Heights on Productivity and Quality of King Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureumcv. King Grass) under Irrigation. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition. 8 (8): 1244-1250
[14] Tekletsadik,T., S. Tusari, S. Juntakool and S. Prasanpanich.2004. Effect of dry season cutting managementon subsequent forage yield and quality of Ruzi (Brachiaria ruziziensis) and Dwarf napier (Pennisetum purpureum. L) in Thailand. Kastsart J. (Nat. Sci.). 38: 457-467
[15] Widayanti, A. (2008). Efek Pemotongan dan Pemupukan Terhadap Produksi dan Kualitas Borreria Alata (Aubl.) Sebagai Hijauan Makanan Ternak Kualitas Tinggi. Skripsi. Fapet IPB, Bogor.
[16] Hawkesford, M., Horst, W., Kichey, T., Lambers, H., Schjoerring, J., Møller, I. S., & White, P. (2012). Chapter 6 - Functions of Macronutrients. In: Marchsner, P. Mineral Nutrition in Higher Plant. Academic Press., 135– 189
[17] Whitehead DC. (2000). Nutrient Elements In Grassland. Soilplant-animal relationships. 369 pp. Wallingford (EG): CABI Publishing
[18] Mansyur, H. Djuned, T. Dhalika, S. Hardjosoewignyo, dan L. Abdullah. (2005). Pengaruh Interval Pemotongan Dan Inveksi Gulma Chromolaena Odorata Terhadap Produksi Dan Kualitas Rumput Brachiaria Humidicola. Media Peternakan Agustus 2005
[19] Sumran Wijitphan, Pornchai Lorwilai and Chutipong Arkaseang. (2009). Effect of Cutting Heights on Productivity and Quality of King Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum cv. King Grass) under Irrigation. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 8: 1244-1250.
[20] Kartasapoetra, A. G. (1991). Pengantar Anatomi Tumbuh-Tumbuhan. Rineka Cipta. Jakarta
[21] Tillman, A. D, H. Hartadi, S. Reksohadiprodjo. (1989). Ilmu Makanan Ternak Dasar. Gadjah Mada University Press. Yogyakarta
[22] Djuned, H., Mansyur, dan H. B. Wijayanti. (2005). Pengaruh Umur Pemotongan Terhadap Kandungan Fraksi Serat Hijauan Murbei (Morus indica L. Var. Kanva-2). Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner
[23] Aulia,F., Erwanto, dan A.K. Wijaya. (2017). Pengaruh Umur Pemotongan Terhadap Kadar Air, Abu, Dan Lemak Kasar Indigofera zollingeriana. Jurnal Riset dan Inovasi Peternakan. 1 (3):1-4. Balai Besar Biogen. http://biogen.litbang.pertanian.go.id/
[24] Karim,A.B, E. R. Rhodes, and P. S. Savill. (1991). Effect Of Cutting Interval On Dry Matter Yield Of Leucaena Leucocephala (Lam) De Wit. J Agrofor Syst 16 : 129–137
[25] Bloomberg M, Mason EG, Jarvis P, Sedcole R. (2008). Predicting seedling biomass of radiata pine from allometric variables. New Forests 36: 103– 114.
[26] Climent J, Chambel MR, Pardos M, Lario F, Villar-Salvador P. (2011). Biomass allocation and foliage heteroblasty in hard pine species respond differentially to reduction in rooting volume. European Journal of Forest Research 130: 841– 850.
Published
2023-04-27
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 397 times
pdf downloaded = 271 times