Evaluasi Kinerja Aparatur Sipil Negara Dalam Menunjang Administrasi dan Kepegawaian Pada Sub Bagian Umum dan Kepegawaian Pemerintah Kecamatan Kayan Hilir, Kabupaten Sintang

Authors

  • Kariana Noviana Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak, Pontianak, Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia
  • Netty Herawati Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak, Pontianak, Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia
  • A. Arifin Universitas Tanjungpura Pontianak, Pontianak, Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22225/pi.11.1.2026.76-87

Keywords:

Civil service, administration, human resources, evaluation, performance

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the performance evaluation of Civil Servants (ASN) in supporting administrative and personnel functions at the General and Personnel Subdivision of Kayan Hilir Subdistrict Office, Sintang Regency. The research problem lies in the suboptimal understanding of administrative regulations and the lack of promptness and independence in performing administrative tasks. This study employs a descriptive method with a qualitative approach, utilizing in-depth interviews, observation, and documentation as data collection techniques. The findings indicate that, based on Levine’s framework as cited in Dwiyanto (2016), ASN performance has not been optimal across three key dimensions. In terms of accountability, inconsistencies in task implementation and reporting reflect weak performance accountability. Regarding responsibility, although tasks are carried out in accordance with formal duties, effectiveness is constrained by uneven understanding of procedures, high workload, and limited number of personnel. In terms of responsiveness, the ability of ASN to respond to administrative needs remains insufficiently adaptive, as indicated by delays in service delivery, inaccuracies in task completion, and dependence on document completeness and internal coordination. Overall, the evaluation reveals a gap between normative performance standards and empirical practices, indicating that ASN performance remains at a formal-procedural level and has not yet achieved substantive performance. This study recommends strengthening supervision, enhancing personnel capacity, improving coordination, and managing workload more systematically to achieve more effective, consistent, and accountable performance

References

Arikunto, S. (2016). Dasar- Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Ariyani, N., & Handayani, R. (2024). Efektivitas Penggunaan Aplikasi E-Kinerja Pegawai Pada Kantor Camat Amuntai Selatan Kabupaten Hulu Sungai Utara. Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, 1, 622–633.

Budiarti, R., Arsyad, M., & Fahmi, Y. (2024). Kinerja Pegawai Aparatur Sipil Negara (ASN) Pada Kantor Kecamatan Banua Lawas Kabupaten Tabalong. Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 6, 182–188.

Dunn, W. N. (2013). Pengantar Analisis Kebijakan Publik. Gajah Mada University Press.

Dwiyanto, A. (2016). Reformasi Birokrasi Publik. Galang Printika.

Fatimah, S., & Malawat, S. H. (2025). Responsivitas Pegawai dalam Meningkatkan Pelayanan Publik di Kantor Kelurahan Mawar Kota Banjarmasin. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Dan Riset Pendidikan, 4(1), 782–786.

Hidayat, P., Sutikno, B., & Mulyadi. (2025). Akuntabilitas kinerja pelayanan publik pada kantor kecamatan gading cempaka kota bengkulu. Jurnal STIA BENGKULU Committe To Administration For Education Quality, 11(1), 45–56.

Jonathan, B., & Hina, R. (2024). Peran Evaluasi Kinerja Dalam Organisasi. Jurnal Penelitian Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 2(1), 106–117.

Keban, T. Y. (2012). Kinerja Organisasi Publik. Fisipol-UGM.

Kurniawan, K. (2025). Evaluasi Kebijakan Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah Di SMK Negeri 1 Sengah Temila Kabupaten Landa. 31, 481–490. https://doi.org/10.33503/paradigma.v31i2.2397

Ma’ruf, Abdullah, M. (2014). Manajemen dan Evaluasi Kinerja Karyawan. Aswaja Pressindo.

Moleong J. Lexy. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: In CV. Remaja Rosdakarya. Alfabeta Bandung.

Muchtar, M. I., & Juhanis, H. (2022). Manajemen Evaluasi Pembelajaran dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Lulusan di Lembaga Studi Bahasa Arab Ma ’ had Al-Birr Makassar Rabiah Syam Pendahuluan Pendidikan yang berkualitas akan menghasilkan lulusan yang memiliki. Jurnal Llmiah Iqra’, 16, 151–166.

Mukrim Ainullah, Sanniati Muddin, M. (2025). Konsep pengukuran dan evaluasi kinerja. Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi, 2, 289–299.

Prawirosentono, S. (2016). Kebijakan Kinerja Karyawan. Cv Pustaka Setia.

Renny, Dewi Cahyawati Abdullah, M. (2025). Fungsi Administrasi Pada Bagian Kepegawaian. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Administrasi Publik, 1(1), 19–23.

Siagian, Sondang, P. (2015). Teori Pengembangan Organisasi. Bumi Aksara.

Sianipar, D. R., Damanik, A. R., Simatupang, A. G., Tarigan, P., Rozzaqiyah, Z., Sitepu, I. B., & Nasution, I. (2023). Implementasi Evaluasi Program Pendidikan di Tingkat Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 5, 161–168.

Situmeang, A. M. (2016). Evaluasi kinerja pegawai dalam pelaksanaan pelayanan di kantor kecamatan balikpapan kota. 4, 4791–4801.

Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta Bandung.

Wibawa, S. (2012). Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Widiaswari, R. R., Kerja, P., Jawab, T., & Performance, W. (2021). Evaluasi Kinerja Pegawai Evaluation Of Employee Performance At Barito Kuala District. 5(2), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.35722/pubbis

Zein, M. H. M. (2024). Kinerja Layanan Administrasi Kepegawaian: Tantangan dan Solusi. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 7, 13068–13075.

Published

2026-07-20

Issue

Section

Articles