Legal Consequences of Bankruptcy on Joint Assets after Divorce
Abstract
Marriage is a legal event that makes a physical and spiritual bond between a man and a woman as husband and wife with the aim of forming a happy and eternal family (household) based on the one and only God. However, not all marriages go as expected which leads to divorce. Marriage creates a union of assets called joint property. In the process of marriage, there are often a number of debts that the husband and wife cannot afford to pay because their joint assets are insufficient to pay these debts. The inability of a husband and wife to pay debts to creditors can be declared bankrupt based on a court decision. This will lead to a problem for joint assets when bankruptcy occurs after a divorce. This study aims to examine the legal consequences of bankruptcy on joint assets after divorce. The type of research is normative legal research. This legal research method is related to the principles and norms of bankruptcy law in Indonesia, in that, legal research is a process to find legal rules to answer the legal issues being faced. The types of approaches used are the statute approach, conceptual approach and legal facts approach. The results of this study showed that in Article 23 of the Bankruptcy Law, it is explained that if a person is declared bankrupt, those who participate in bankruptcy include the wife or husband with the status that the wife/husband after marriage is related to the union of assets. The legal consequences of the bankruptcy of joint assets that have not been divided after the divorce refer to the provisions for the distribution of joint assets in the marriage law and the Civil Code.
References
Dewi, P. E. T. (2019). Implementasi Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Dalam Kepailitan Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Jurnal Hukum Saraswati, 1(2), 284. Retrieved from https://e-journal.unmas.ac.id/index.php/JHS/article/view/662.
Dewi, P. E. T. (2020). Akibat Hukum Perkawinan Beda Agama Yang Dilangsungkan Di Luar Negeri. YUSTITIA, 14(2). Retrieved from https://ojs.unr.ac.id/index.php/yustitia/article/view/491
Dewi, P. E. T. (2021). The Cross-Border Insolvency in the Execution of Bankrupt Assets Outside Indonesian Jurisdiction: A Comparative Study with Malaysia, Singapore, and the Philippines. IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 5(1), 47–59. doi:10.22146/ikat.v5i1.64157
Djuniarti, E. (2017). Hukum Harta Bersama Ditinjau dari Perspektif Undang-Undang Perkawinan dan KUH Perdata. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 17(4), 445–461. doi:10.30641/dejure.2017.V17.445-461
Germain, G. (2016). Bankruptcy Law and Practice. United States of America: CALI eLangdell Press.
Judiasih, S. D. (2015). Harta Benda Perkawinan Kajian Terhadap Kesetaraan Hak dan Kedudukan Suami dan Istri atas Kepemilikan Harta dalam Perkawinan. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Krisna, I. G., & Marwanto. (2021). Kedudukan Harta Benda Perkawinan Sebagai Harta Pailit Suami Istri Yang Bercerai Secara Agama. Kertha Semaya, 9(4), 703–714. doi:https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2021.v09.i04.p12
Logika, A., & Anggoro, T. (2021). Akibat Hukum Kepailitan Suami Terhadap Harta Bersama Berdasarkan Putusan Nomor 510/PDT.G/2019/PN.JKT.SEL. PALAR: PAKUAN LAW REVIEW, 7(2), 282–298. doi:10.33751/palar.v7i2.4174
Makangiras, A. S. (2014). Prinsip-prinsip Hukum Harta Bersama Dalam Perkawinan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974. Lex Privatum, 2(1), 116–126. Retrieved from https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/3966
Mantili, R., & Dewi, P. E. T. (2021). Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Terkait Penyelesaian Utang Piutang Dalam Kepailitan. Jurnal Aktual Justice, 6(1), 1–19. doi:10.47329/aktualjustice.v6i1.618
Ramulyo, M. I. (1995). Hukum Perkawinan, Hukum Kewarisan, Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama, dan Zakat Menurut Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Sutini, W., & Dewi, P. E. T. (2021). Pembagian Harta Bersama Pasca PerceraianTerhadap Kontribusi Isteri Sebagai Pencari Nafkah (Studi Komparasi di Australia, Malaysia dan Jepang). Jurnal Aktual Justice, 6(2), 121–139. doi:https://doi.org/10.47329/aktualjustice.v6i2.768
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata)
Undang–Undang Nomor 1 tahun 1974 sebagaimana diubah menjadi Undang-Undang Nomor 16 tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan
Undang–Undang Nomor 37 tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang
Abstract viewed = 155 times
PDF downloaded = 293 times
