Legal Liability of Doctors on the Disclosure Medical Secrecy for Covid-19 Patients in the Pandemic Era
Abstract
The Covid-19 outbreak is a disease that attack countries around the world, no exception in Indonesia. The discourse of revealing the secrecy of positive Covid-19 patient medicine raises pros and cons in society. This study aims to analyze the concept of medical secrecy according to statutory regulations and legal liability of doctors in revealing medical secrecy in the pandemic era. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach, and a conceptual approach. The source of data collection consists of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal material. The results of the research show that medical secrecy is confidential individual right. The identity of Covid-19 patients can be accessed in a limited manner by authorized institutions and used proportionally and appropriately for the benefit of handling the Covid-19 outbreak. In order to anticipate an increase in Covid-19 transmission, the practice of using patient personal data is implemented by several countries according to principles proporsionalitas, necesssitas and purposive limitation.
References
Astuti, E. K. (2009). Transaksi Terapeutik (Dalam upaya pelayanan Medis di RS). Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
Azizah, K. N. (2020). Kronologi 2 Pasien Pertama Virus Corona COVID-19 di Indonesia.
Bustan, M. T. S. (2020). Pasien Positif Covid-19 di Palu Kabur dari Rumah Sakit.
Hanafiah, M. J., & Amir, A. (2017). Etika Kedokteran & Hukum Kesehatan. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kedokteran.
Haryanto, E. Y. (2015). Kedudukan Rekam Medis Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Malpraktik di Bagian Kedokteran. LEX CRIMEN, 4(2).
Hatta, M. (2010). Kebijakan Politik Kriminal (Penegakan Hukum Dalam Rangka Penanggulangan Kejahatan). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Isfandyarie, A. (2006). Tanggung Jawab Hukum dan Sanksi bagi Dokter (N. Y. Puspita, Ed.). Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
Ishaq. (2017). Metode Penelitian Hukum & Penulisan Skripsi, Tesis, Serta Disertasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Kementerian Kesehatan RI. (2020). Tentang Data Persebaran Penyakit Virus Covid 19 per April 2020.
Kusmaryanto, C. B. (2018). Bioetika. Yogyakarta: Buku Kompas.
Lembaga Studi dan Advokasi Masyarakat (ELSAM). (2020). Perlu Kesetimbangan Perlindungan Privasi dan Kesehatan Publik dalam Penanganan COVID-19.
Machmud, S. (2008). Penegakan hukum dan perlindungan hukum bagi dokter yang diduga melakukan Medical Malpraktik. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Marzuki, P. M. (2009). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mertokusumo, S. (2005). Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Munir, A. B., & et al. (2014). Data Protection Law in Asia. Hong Kong: Thompson Reuters Limited.
Prananda, R. R. (2020). Batasan Hukum Keterbukaan Data Medis Pasien Pengidap Covid-19: Perlindungan Privasi VS Transparansi Informasi Publik. Jurnal Law, Development & Justice Review, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Diponegoro, 3(1).
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Sudjana, J. C. (1993). Peningkatan Peran PERHUKI oleh Peradilan Profesi. Yogyakarta: Kongres 111 PERHUKI.
Sujamto. (1996). Aspek-Aspek Pengawasan Di Indonesia. Makasar: Sinar Grafika.
Suryadhimirtha, R. (2011). Hukum Malpraktik Kedokteran. Yogyakarta: Total media.
Yunanto, A., & Helmi. (2010). Hukum pidana Malpraktek Medic Tinjauan dan Perspektif Medikolegal. Yogyakarta: ANDI.
Abstract viewed = 367 times
PDF downloaded = 884 times
