UNJUK KERJA HIDROGRAF SATUAN SINTETIK NAKAYASU, ITB 2 DAN LIMANTARA UNTUK DAERAH ALIRAN SUNGAI BERBENTUK MEMANJANG

  • Humairo Saidah Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Universitas Mataram, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia
  • Agustono Setiawan Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Universitas Mataram, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia
  • Lilik Hanifah Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Universitas Mataram, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia
  • Agus Suroso Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Universitas Mataram, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia
  • Anid Supriyadi Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Universitas Mataram, Mataram, Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia
Keywords: design flood, SUH ITB2, SUH Limantara, SUH Nakayasu, unit hydrograph

Abstract

Estimated flood discharge value for water structure design, ideally determined based on the frequency analysis of measured discharge data. However, the measured discharge data is often not recorded or if the length is limited. So, it needs the technique in getting the design flood value from rain data through the Synthetic Unit Hydrograph (SUH) method. This study examined the suitability of the three (3) SUH methods (Nakayasu, Limantara and ITB2) in generating the design flood discharge and compared it with the Observed Unit Hydrograph (OUH) of the elongated shape watersheds, namely Sidutan and Reak. The main values that are compared are peak discharge, peak time, and base time of HSS to the HSO value. The results obtained from the Sidutan watershed and the Reak watershed are both elongated shape watershed, have almost the same length as the main river, but the area of the Sidutan watershed is greater than Reak watershed. The average OUH of both watersheds indicated that both Qp and Tb of the Sidutan watershed are greater than Reak, but the time peak hydrograph (Tp) was reached at almost the same time. The SUH method that produced unit hydrographs closest to OUH is Nakayasu, then ITB2 and Limantara, respectively.

References

Abdaa, D., & Darfia, N. E. (2021). Analisis Debit Banjir Rencana Das Ambacang Berdasarkan Hidrograf Satuan Sintetis Metode Nakayasu Dan Metode Scs. PROSIDING SNAST, 11–18. https://journal.akprind.ac.id/index.php/prosidingsnast/article/view/3438

Agus, I., & Hadihardaja, I. K. (2011). Perbandingan Hidrograf Satuan Teoritis Terhadap Hidrograf Satuan Observasi DAS Ciliwung Hulu. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 18(1), 55–70. https://fa.itb.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/sites/8/2011/04/5.-Indra-Agus-dkk-Vol.18-No.1.pdf

Amiruddin, A., Saparuddin, S., & Anasiru, T. (2020). Debit Banjir Rancangan DAS Tojo Metode HSS ITB 1. Borneo Engineering : Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 4(2), 126–137. https://doi.org/10.35334/be.v4i2.1582

Andiese, V. W. (2013). Pengujian Metode Hidrograf Satuan Sintetik Gama I Dalam Analisis Debit Banjir Rancangan Das Bangga. MEKTEK, 14(1), Article 1. http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/Mektek/article/view/1027

Ginting, S. (2022). Evaluasi Penentuan Durasi Hujan Efektif (Tr) Pada Hidrograf Satuan Sintetis Nakayasu. Akselerasi, 3(2).

Handayani, R., Fauzi, M., & Hendri, A. (2016). Analisis Besaran Hidrograf Satuan Berdasarkan Karakteristik Daerah Aliran Sungai Siak, Doctoral Dissertation, Riau University.

Harto, S., BR. (1993a). Analisis Hidrologi. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Harto, S., BR. (1993b). Hidrograf Satuan Sintetik Gama I. Badan Penerbit Pekerjaan Umum.

Harto, S., BR. (1999). Hidrologi, Teori, Masalah dan Penyelesaian (Vol. 1–1). Teknik Sipil UGM.

Iyan, E. R., Labdul, B. Y., & Husnan, R. (2022). Optimasi Koefisien Parameter Hidrograf Satuan Sintetik Itb-1 Dan Itb-2 Di Sub Das Bionga Kayubulan. Composite Journal, 2(1), 21–27.

Kahffi, A., & Lipu, S. (2021). Analisis Hidrograf DAS Poso dengan Metode Hidrograf Satuan Sintetis Snyder dan Hidrograf Satuan Sintetis Soil Conversation Service (SCS). Rekonstruksi Tadulako: Civil Engineering Journal on Research and Development, 121–128.

Limantara, L. M. (2012). Hidrograf Satuan Sintetik Limantara (Studi Kasus di Sebagian DAS di Indonesia). Rekayasa Sipil, 3(3), 209–226. https://rekayasasipil.ub.ac.id/index.php/rs/article/view/153

Natakusumah, D. K., Hatmoko, W., & Harlan, D. (2011a). Prosedur Umum Perhitungan Hidrograf Satuan Sintetis dengan Cara ITB dan Beberapa Contoh Penerapannya. 42.

Natakusumah, D. K., Hatmoko, W., & Harlan, D. (2011b). Prosedur Umum Perhitungan Hidrograf Satuan Sintetis dengan Cara ITB dan Beberapa Contoh Penerapannya. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 18(3), 251–291. https://doi.org/10.5614/jts.2011.18.3.6

Siby, E. P., Kawet, L., & Halim, F. (2013). Studi Perbandingan Hidrograf Satuan Sintetik Pada Daerah Aliran Sungai Ranoyapo. Jurnal Sipil Statik, 1(4), Article 4. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/jss/article/view/1389

Subramanya, K. (1984). Engineering Hydrology. McGraw-Hill.

Sutapa, I. W. (2005). Kajian Hidrograf Satuan Sintetik Nakayasu Untuk Perhitungan Debit Banjir Rancangan Di Daerah Aliran Sungai Kodina. 1, 6.

Syahroni, M. (2021). Peak Debit Analysis Using Synthetic Unit Hydographic Method Itb 1 And Hec-Ras Version 5.0.7 (Case Study of Manna Downstream watershed). Inersia: Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 13(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.33369/ijts.13.1.17-24

Triono, N. D. (2010). Kajian Hubungan Geomorfologi DAS dan Karakteristik Hidrologi.

Published
2022-11-19
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 217 times
PDF downloaded = 1015 times