COMPARISON OF LAWS FOR SETTLING DEBT REMAINING BANKRUPTCY BETWEEN INDONESIAN AND DUTCH COUNTRIES
Abstract
Legal products applied in Indonesia are legal products of Dutch heritage. Many of these legal products are no longer able to accommodate the legal needs of today's society. Therefore, it is necessary to reform the law, one of which is in the field of bankruptcy law. In the Netherlands, bankruptcy law has undergone a development of one regarding the settlement of debtor's remaining debts. The aims of this research is to know the legal differences in the settlement of debtor debts between Indonesia and the Netherlands, a legal comparison is needed. The method of research is legal comparison carried out by means of descriptive analysis by using a statue approach, comparative approach, conceptual approach, and historical approach. The difference in settlement of remaining debt applied in Indonesia and in the Netherlands is influenced by differences in normalized principles in bankruptcy laws in each country. Indonesia which normalizes the debt collection principle has the consequence that the remaining debt will continue to follow the bankrupt debtor until the debt is paid in full. This is different from the settlement of the remaining debt in the Netherlands that normalizes the principle of debt forgiveness, which in this principle of debt forgiveness, which in this principle the payment of the remaining debtor debt is given a maximum period of 5 years. In that period the debtor is still not able to pay off the remaining debt, the debtor can be terminated by a judge so that the debtor will be free from the remaining debts.References
Assalmani, M., Asyhar, N. B., & Priyono, D. (2018). Konsep Pengaturan Cross-Border Insolvency Badan Usaha Di Association Of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Asean Economic Integration. Repository Universitas Diponegoro. Universitas Diponegoro.
Dutch Bankruptcy Act.
Kapero, H. V. C. (2018). Akibat Kepailitan Terhadap Harta Peninggalan Dikaitkan Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Lex Et Societatis, 6(2), 126–133.
Khair, U. (2018). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Akibat Hukum Putusan Pernyataan Pailit Bagi Debitor Terhadap Kreditor Pemegang Hak Tanggungan. Jurnal Cendekia Hukum, 3(2), 258–271.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.
Kurniawan, M. (2018). Tugas Dan Fungsi Balai Harta Peninggalan Semarang Sebagai Kurator Kepailitan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1(1), 65–76.
Makmur, S. (2016). Kepastian Hukum Kepailitan Bagi Kreditur dan Debitur Pada Pengadilan Niaga Indonesia. Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law, 4(2), 337–368.
Marzuki, P. M. (2013). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (PERPU) Nomor 1 Tahun 1998 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang tentang Kepailitan, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1998 Nomor 87.
Rahayu, N. G. A. M. N., & Pemayun, C. I. A. (2018). Analisa Yuridis Terhadap Pengaturan Debt Collection Principle Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Nomor 59/Pailit/2001/Pn Niaga/Jkt.Pst. Kertha Semaya, 6(3), 1–15.
Retnaningsih, S. (2017). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Debitor Pailit Individu Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Kepailitan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER, 3(1), 1–16.
Shubhan, M. . (2012). Hukum Kepailitan; Prinsip, Norma, dan Praktik di Peradilan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Sihotang, E. G., Atmadja, I. B. P., & Sukihana, I. A. (2018). Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim Dan Upaya Hukum Debitor Pailit Terkait Penggunaan Paksa Badan Dalam Kepailitan. Kertha Semaya, 6(4), 1–15.
Sinaga, N. A., & Sulisrudatin, N. (2016). Hukum Kepailitan Dan Permasalahannya Di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 7(1), 158–173.
Sjahdeini, S. . (2016). Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan; Memahami Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji. S. (2009). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 1998 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintahan Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1998 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang tentang Kepailitan menjadi Undang-Undang, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1998 Nomor 7.
Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 131, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4443.
Copyright (c) 2019 NOTARIIL: Jurnal Kenotariatan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 164 times
PDF downloaded = 743 times
