General Election and the Study of the Future
Abstract
Indonesia's position in electoral development is getting better because of the legislation. It is different when a strong bargaining position is artificial. In this case, the state becomes strong because of its own efforts such as having sophisticated technology programs, producing sophisticated weapons, or having world-class athletes. The problem is when the candidate listed in the empty ballot has been elected by the community but the chosen one does not win, then such election is actually not of the will of the community. This study uses normative legal study design which means that it is normative juridical legal research. The approaches used in legal research are statute approach, case approach, and conceptual approach. Future elections will no longer change when there is no legal clarity in Indonesia if the robot is included in it. The election aimed at robots for is not being a contradiction but is a way out to produce elections that are truly fair. When we choose robots in the elections, artificial intelligence holds norms in society. Artificial intelligence will become a habit in Indonesia, turning to jus cogens because its main nature is indirect force.References
Asshiddiqie, J. (2007). Pokok-Pokok Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: BIP.
Burnap, P., Gibson, R., Sloan, L., Southern, R., & Williams, M. (2016). 140 characters to victory?: Using Twitter to predict the UK 2015 General Election. Electoral Studies, 41, 230–233.
Cottrell, D., Herron, M. C., & Westwood, S. J. (2018). An exploration of Donald Trump’s allegations of massive voter fraud in the 2016 General Election. Electoral Studies, 51, 123–142.
Cutts, D., Goodwin, M., & Milazzo, C. (2017). Defeat of the People’s Army? The 2015 British general election and the UK Independence Party (UKIP). Electoral Studies, 48, 70–83.
Evans, J., Arzheimer, K., Campbell, R., & Cowley, P. (2017). Candidate localness and voter choice in the 2015 General Election in England. Political Geography, 59, 61–71.
Fisher, S. D., & Lewis-Beck, M. S. (2016). Forecasting the 2015 British general election: The 1992 debacle all over again? Electoral Studies, 41, 225–229.
Friedrich, C. J. (2004). Filsafat Hukum Perspektif Historis. Bandung: Nuansa dan Nusamedia.
Hatta, M. (2014). Kedaulatan Rakyat, Otonomi dan Demokrasi. Bantul: Kreasi Wacana.
Hummel, P. (2010). Flip-flopping from primaries to general elections. Journal of Public Economics, 94(11–12), 1020–1027.
Mannino, A., Althaus, D., Erhardt, J., Gloor, L., Hutter, A. & Metzinger, T. (2015). Artificial Intelligence: Opportunities and Risks. Policy Paper by the E_ective Altruism Foundation, 2, 1–16.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Michael, T. (2018). Hukum Isaac Asimov Dan Masa Depan Tenaga Kerja. Surabaya: UMM Surabaya.
Nevejans. N. (2016). Directorate-General For Internal Policies. European Civil Law rules In Robotics, Policy Department C: Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs European Parliament B-1047 Brussels
Prosser, C. (2016). Do local elections predict the outcome of the next general election? Forecasting British general elections from local election national vote share estimates. Electoral Studies, 41, 274–278.
Purnomosidi, A. (2012). Negara Hukum Pancasila: Analisis Terhadap UUD 1945 Pra dan Pasca Perubahan. Salatiga: Program Pascasarjana Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.
Pusham. (2018). Dimensi HAM dalam Pemilu. Retrieved August 29, 2018, from http://pusham.unimed.ac.id/index.php/berita/79-dimensi-ham-dalam-pemilu.
Rahardjo, S. (2009). Negara Hukum yang Membahagiakan Rakyatnya. Jakarta: Genta Publishing.
Rallings, C., Thrasher, M., & Borisyuk, G. (2016). Forecasting the 2015 general election using aggregate local election data. Electoral Studies, 41, 279–282.
Republik Indonesia, B. P. P. U. Ringkasan Eksekutif Indeks Kerawanan Pemilu 2019 (2018). Jakarta: Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia.
Retto. (2017). Sophia, First Citizen Robot of the World. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos Lima.
Teitel, R. G. (2004). Keadilan Transisi Sebuah Tinjauan Komprehensif. Jakarta: EL-sam.
Copyright (c) 2018 NOTARIIL: Jurnal Kenotariatan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 180 times
PDF downloaded = 116 times
