The Implication of Recognition Principle in the Administraton of Village Governance
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the implications of the existence of the principle of recognition to the administration of village governance. The method used is normative method with juridical, statute, and doctrinal approaches. The principle of recognition brings the existence of the village to play an independent role in the administration of village governance and the affairs of the village while increasing the participation of the village community in realizing good governance. This principle of recognition is also an alternative in exploring the origin of the village in question, especially for villages that are beginning to forget their origins. Notwithstanding, basically the principle of recognition is recognizable as long as it is still alive and applies in the village concerned.References
Article 1 number 2. Article 1 number 2 of Indonesian Government Regulation No. 76 of 2001 (2001).
Beugelsdijk, S., & Jindra, B. (2018). Product innovation and decision-making autonomy in subsidiaries of multinational companies. Journal of World Business, 53(4), 529–539.
Destifani, I. (2013). Pelaksanaan Kewenangan Desa Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Otonomi Desa (Studi Pada Desa Sumber, Kecamatan Kradenan, Kabupaten Blora). Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 1 (6), 1239–1246.
Gie, T. L. (1982). Kumpulan Pembahasan Terhadap Undang-Undang tentang Pokok-pokok Pemerintahan Daerah Indonesia (Second Edi). Yogyakarta: Super Sukses.
Gunawan, J., et al. (2005). Desentralisasi, Globalisasi, dan Demokrasi Lokal. Jakarta: LP3ES.
Huda, N. matul. (2015). Hukum Pemerintahan Desa Dalam Konstitsi Indonesia Sejak Kemerdekaan Hingga Era Reformasi. Malang: Setara Press.
Maier, B. (2014). Is the narrow concept of individual autonomy compatible with or in conflict with Evidence-based Medicine in obstetric practice?: A philosophical critique on the misapplication of the value concept “autonomy.†Woman - Psychosomatic Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 1(C), 40–49.
Osipian, A. L. (2017). University autonomy in Ukraine: Higher education corruption and the state. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 50(3), 233–243.
Refi, Wahyuni ., & Falahi, Z. (2014). Desa Cosmopolitan Globalisasi dan Masa Depan Kekayaan Alam Indonesia. Jakarta: Change Publication.
Soemitro, R. (1983). Peraturan Perundang-undangan tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dari Tahun 1945 s/d 1983. Jakarta: PT. Eresco Tarate.
Syafrudin, A., & Na’a, S. (2010). Republik Desa, Pergulatan Hukum Tradisional dan Hukum Modern dalam Desain Otonomi Desa. Bandung: Alumni.
Topp, L. (2007). Psychiatric institutions, their architecture, and the politics of regional autonomy in the Austro-Hungarian monarchy. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 38(4), 733–755.
UU. Law No. 1 of 1957 (1957).
Wood, K. N., Badrov, M. B., Speechley, M. R., & Shoemaker, J. K. (2017). Regional cerebral cortical thickness correlates with autonomic outflow. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical, 207, 28–36.
Copyright (c) 2018 NOTARIIL: Jurnal Kenotariatan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 94 times
PDF downloaded = 159 times
