OBSTACLES TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF NOTARY AUTHORITY TO CERTIFY TRANSACTIONS ELECTRONICALLY IN BALI
Abstract
This study aims to examine the implementation and constraints of implementing the authority of a Notary to certify transactions electronically. The type of research used is empirical legal research. This study is analysed by using the theory of authority and the theory of utilitarianism (legal expediency) so as to obtain the conclusion of the discussion study in the form of implementation of electronically certifying transactions by a Notary in the form of legal actions or actions by a Notary in providing ratification of an electronic transaction that has similarities with legalization or waarmerking owned by a Notary conventionally. Based on analysis, it was obtained the results that the authority is attributive because it is obtained directly based on the provisions of Article 15 Paragraph (3) of the UUJN-P so that juridically the Notary has this authority only in its implementation because there is no one guideline due to the absence of further arrangements regarding procedures, procedures and types of notary legal actions that are qualified as certifying transactions electronically. The obstacles faced, namely the implementation of certifying transactions electronically in perspective as evidence, it can be conveyed that electronic documents as evidence of legal actions certifying transactions electronically by Notaries are not yet clear the strength of proof as evidence whether it is qualified as an authentic deed product or is it limited to registering, knowing the existence of documents that are certified as legal actions Notary as legalizing or megewaarmeken.
References
Darmodiharjo, D., & Shidharta. (1999). Pokok-Pokok Filsafat Hukum; Apa dan Bagaimana Filsafat Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Erliyani, R., & Hamdan, S. R. (2020). Akta Notaris Dalam Pembuktian Perkara Perdata dan Perkembangan Cyber Notary. Yogyakarta: Dialektika.
Holidi, M. (2018). Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Otentik Dalam Proses Peradilan Perdata Di Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta. Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta.
Jaya, J. A., Zulaeha, M., & Suprapto, S. (2022). Kewenangan Notaris dalam Mensertifikasi Transaksi Elektronik ditinjau dari Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris. Notary Law Journal, 1(2), 131–144. doi:10.32801/nolaj.v1i2.19
Kuspratomo, Y. P., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2020). Making Implementation Deed Electronically Based on Law of Notary. Jurnal Akta, 6(4), 691. doi:10.30659/akta.v6i4.7666
Mertokusumo, S. (1998). Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Sjaifurrachman, & Adjie, H. (2011). Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
Soegondo, R. (1991). Hukum Pembuktian. Jakara: PT. Pradnya Paramita.
Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary LN 2004/117; TLN NO. 4432 dated October 6, 2004.
Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Transactions electronically LN 2008/58; TLN NO. 4843 dated April 21, 2008.
Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary LN 2014/3; TLN NO. 5491 dated January 15, 2014.
Law Number 20 of 2014 concerning Standardization and Conformity Assessment of LN 2014/216; TLN NO. 5584 Dated September 17, 2014.
Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Transactions electronically LN 2016/251; TLN NO. 5952 dated November 25, 2016.
Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions LN 2019/185; TLN NO. 6400 dated October 10, 2019.
Regulation of the Minister of Communication and Informatics of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2018 concerning the Implementation of BN Electronic Certification 2018/1238 dated September 6, 2018.
Copyright (c) 2022 NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.