QUALIFICATION OF THE PRUDENCE PRINCIPLE OF NOTARY ON IMPLEMENT THE POSITION BASED ON ACT OF NOTARY POSITION
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to examine and analyze clearly the scope of the Notary prudence principle on implement his/her position so that definitive or limitative limits are found regarding the Notary prudence principle on implement his/her position. The method used is normative legal research. Data collected through basic regulations, laws and regulations, and legal norm. The theories applied such as the theory of legal protection, the theory of legal certainty, and the theory of responsibility. The results of this research indicate that Article 16 paragraph (1) letters a and m describe the implementation of the Notary position, while the provisions of Article 17 instruct the Notary on implement his/her position to stay away from all prohibitions that are not allowed to be carried out in carrying out his duties, one of which is in the form of doing other job that are contrary to religious norms, decency or propriety that can affect the honor and dignity of the position of a Notary. The provisions of UUJN jo. UUJN-P in particular the provisions of Article 16 paragraph (1) letter a as a violation of the fulfillment of the prudence principle and an administrative violation. Thus, as a Notary, it is advisable to comply more with all the provisions of the UUJN jo. UUJN-P, is careful, thorough and thorough in administering the deed, in order to eliminate the bad intentions of those who deliberately blame and place the Notary as committing an unlawful act, both civil and penal.
References
Act Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of a Notary (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2004 Number 177, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4432).
Act Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Act Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of a Notary (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2014 Number 3, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia 5491).
Code of Civil law
Code of Penal Law.
Darus, M. L. H. (2017). Hukum Notariat dan Tanggung Jawab Jabatan Notaris. Yogyakarta: UII Press.
Hadjon, P. M. (1998). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Lotulung, P. E. (1993). Beberapa Sistem Tentang Kontrol Segi Hukum Terhadap Pemerintah. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Notary Code of Ethic.
Putra, I. K. M., Mahendrawati, N. L., & Arini, D. G. D. (2020). Penerapan Pasal 1320 KUH Perdata Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Penjual Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Barang Melalui Media Internet. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, 2(1), 73–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.22225/ah.2.1.2020.73-77
Putri, M. K., Dewantara, R., & Aju Wisnu, D. (2020). The Implementation of Prudential Principles in Liquiding Credit Using Covernote Notary. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(7), 436. doi:10.18415/ijmmu.v7i7.1865
Saputra, G. W. D., Rodliyah, R., & Pria Suhartana, L. W. (2019). Implementation of Notary Prudence Principle in the Cooperative’s Deed of Establishment. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 6(4), 297. doi:10.18415/ijmmu.v6i4.983
Sulihandari, H., & Rifiani, N. (2013). Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Profesi Notaris. Jakarta: Dunia Cerdas.
Copyright (c) 2022 NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 124 times
PDF downloaded = 139 times
