The Liability of Criminal Law towards a Notary Official in the Crime of Embezzlement at the Denpasar District Court
Abstract
This study aims to investigate three issues namely the legal consequences of Criminal Acts against Victims of Misappropriated Crimes by a Notary Officer, the factors cause a Notary Officer to commit a Criminal Act in the Legal District of the Denpasar District Court and the qualifications of criminal acts, responsibilities and formulations Criminal system for the perpetrators of embezzlement by a notary at the Denpasar District Court. The method used is Normative Juridical collaboration method with Empirical Juridical. The techniques of data collection is interview. The results show that criminal law consequences of perpetrators and victims of embezzlement crimes by a notary officer is that the perpetrators must be held accountable for their actions legally, whereas victims who suffer losses due to criminal acts are processed to be given criminal sanctions through the criminal justice process at the Denpasar District Court. Then, factors causing crime that are internal and external factors. There are some external factors, namely ​​residence factor, economic factor, political factor and legal system factor. Furthermore, the forms of embezzlement are included in the forms/qualifications of types of non-violent acts, embezzlement criminal responsibility is an individual criminal liability not a legal entity, the system of punishment against perpetrators of embezzlement is the application of criminal law sanctions through the criminal justice process so that against the crime of embezzlement convicted of committing sanctions in the form of imprisonment and fines.
References
Friedman, L. M. (2001). American Law and Introduction, Penerjemah Whisnu Basuki, dalam Bacaan Bahasa Inggris Hukum untuk Mahasiswa “What Is a Legal System.†(W. Basuki, Ed.) (2nd ed.). Jakarta: Penerbit Tata Nusa.
Hadjon, P. M. (2007). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia Sebuah Studi tentang prinsip-prinsipnya Penangannya oleh Pengadilan Dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi (Edisi Khus). Surabaya: Penerbit Peradaban.
Manullung, F. M. (2007). Menggapai Hukum Berkeadilan Tinjauan Hukum Kodrat dan Antinomia Nilai. Jakarta: PT. Kompas Media Nusantara.
Moeljatno. (2008). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana (Edisi Revi). Jakarta: Penerbit Rineka.
Nahak, S. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Lingkungan Terhadap Pengembangan Ekowisata. Harian Bisnis Bali.
Pedoman Teknis, A. (2008). Pedoman Teknis Administrasi Dan Teknis Peradilan Pidana Umum Dan Pidana Khusus (Cetakan II). Jakarta: Penerbit Mahkamah Agung RI.
Rawls, J. (1995). A Theory of Justice (Teori Keadilan). Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Sahetapy JE, C. (1982). Kausa Kejahatan dan beberapa Analisa Kriminologi. Jakarta: Penerbit CV Rajawali.
Soesilo, R. (2013). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) serta komentar-komentarnya Lengkap Pasal demi Pasal. Bogor: Politeia.
Sukinto, Y. W. (2012). Kebijakan Formulasi Sanksi Pidana Dalam Tindak Pidana Penyelundupan di Indonesia. Universitas Brawijaya.
Utrecht, E., & Jindang, M. S. J. (1989). Pengantar Dalam Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Iktiar Baru dan Sinar Harapan.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor: 2 Tahun 2014 tentang perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jabatan Notaris.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor. 10 Tahun 2004 yang telah diperbaharui dengan UU RI No. 12 Tahun 2011 dan dirubah lagi dengan UU RI No. 15 Tahun 2019 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan.
Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Notariil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.