CRIMINAL POLICY IN CONFLICT INDIGENOUS LAND

  • Anak Agung Gde Bagus Mahendra Putra Magister of Notary, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar-Bali
  • Simon Nahak Magister of Notary, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar-Bali
  • I Ketut Widia Magister of Notary, Universitas Warmadewa, Denpasar-Bali
Keywords: Conflict, Criminal Policy, Customary Land

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the criminal policy in the field of land against customary land conflicts and the criminal policy regarding efforts to overcome conflicts over customary land tenure. The method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach, a library approach, a case approach and a concept approach. The materials used are primary, secondary and tertiary data sources, and then analyzed using legal hermeneutic interpretation techniques. As a result of analysis, it shows that the Criminal Policy in the Field of Land Against Customary Land Conflict is the act of the perpetrators both individually and in groups can result in losses not harmonizing the local indigenous community, there is a criminal nature against the law so that there are perpetrators subject to criminal sanctions in the form of basic penalties namely; as regulated and threatened in Article 10 of the Criminal Code in the form of basic sentences namely the death penalty, imprisonment, confinement and fines and additional penalties for revocation of certain rights, the seizure of certain items and the announcement of a judge's decision. In conclusion, the criminal aspect in every customary conflict is always trailing because usually in customary conflict there are parties who force the will to intersect with customary issues so that they can disturb public order until there is a criminal nature against the law.

References

Arief, B. N. (1998). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Hasan, A. (2007). Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum Berdasarkan Adat Badamai padaMasyarakat Banjar dalam Kerangka Sistem Hukum Nasional. Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia. Retrieved from https://dspace.uii.ac.id/bitstream/handle/123456789/9400/DISERTASI 41.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Kaelen. (2008). Filsafat Pancasilan. Yogyakarta: Percetakan Pernada.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP)

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)

Nahak, S. (2017). Tanggungjawab Hukum Pidana seorang pejabat Notaris Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penggelapan di Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar. Penelitian Individu Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan dengan biaya RKA Pascasarjana Universitas Warmadewa Denpasar.

Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Bali Nomor 4 Tahun 2019 tentang Desa Adat di Bali.

Raharjo, T. (2010). Mediasi Pidana dalam Ketentuan Hukum Pidana Adat. Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal, 17(3), 492–519. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss3.art8

Suartika, I. G. (2010). Anatomi konflik adat di desa pakraman dan cara penyelesaiannya. Denpasar: Udayana University Press.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria

Utsman, S. (2013). Hukum Masyarakat Nelayan Saka dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional. Ius Quia Iustum Law Journal, 20(3), 386–401. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol20.iss3.art3

Published
2019-11-22
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 106 times
PDF downloaded = 91 times