LEGALITY OF DEBT RECOVERY LETTERS WITH THE POWER OF SELLING BASED ON ARTICLE 224 HIR (HERZIEN INLANDSCH REGLEMENT)
Abstract
This research aims is to determine the basis for judges' considerations in ratifying the sale and purchase deeds based on the Debt Recognition Letter with Power of Attorney to pay off debts in the Decision of the Supreme Court No. 2290 K / PDT / 2012 which can be justified based on the prevailing laws and regulations and knowing the matters that need attention concerning the legal consequences of the deed of selling right for guarantee of Land Rights. This recent study uses a normative legal research method that examines and analyzes existing legal issues through existing legal sources and applicable laws and regulations. The results of this study found that the Judge's Consideration in the Supreme Court Decree No. 2290 K / PDT / 2012 which stated that Judex Facti was not wrong to apply the law, decided two legal actions of the plaintiff were legally valid and the legal consequences that occurred after the Supreme Court Decision No. 2290 K / PDT / 2012, then the creditor can have a Guarantee for Land Based on a Credit Recognition Letter made imperfectly (Authentic and Unilateral) on the basis of a Deed of Sale and Purchase without a number authorized by the Panel of Judges in the Decision.References
Abidin, Z., & Hernawan, A. (2018). Kajian Terhadap Akta Perikatan Jual Beli dan Akta Kuasa Menjual Yang dibuat Berdasarkan Hubungan Hukum Hutang Piutang di Kabupaten Bantul. Yogyakarta. Electronic Theses & Disertation Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Arto, M. (2004). Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama, Cetakan 5. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bakri, M. (2015). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia Jilid 2: Pembidangan dan Asas-Asas Hukum, Cetakan Kedua. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Budiono, H. (2006, November). Perwakilan, Kuasa dan Pemberian Kuasa. Majalah Renvoi.
Fuady, M. (2005). Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Harahap, M. Y. (2013). Hukum Acara Perdata Cetakan ke 13. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Manan, A. (2008). Penerapan Hukum Acara Perdata di Lingkungan Peradilan Agama, Cetakan 5. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Mantayborbir. (2006). Hukum Perbankan dan Sistem hukum Piutang dan Lelang Negara. Medan: Pustaka Bangsa Press.
Mertokusumo, S. (1988). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Muljadi, K., & Widajaja, G. (2008). Hak Tanggungan, Seri Hukum Harta Kekayaan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Permadi, I. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pembeli Tanah Bersertifikat Ganda Dengan Cara Itikad Baik Demi Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Yustisia, 5(2), 448–467.
Prasminda, G. D., Usfunan, Y., & Udiana, I. M. (2017). Kuasa Menjual Notariil Sebagai Instrumen Pemenuhan Kewajiban Debitur Yang Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Utang Piutang. Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 2(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2017.v02.i01.p05
Rio, J. (2016). Implementasi Dan Akibat Hukum Pembuatan Surat Kuasa Membebankan Hak Tanggungan (Skmht) Yang Dibuat Dihadapan Notaris (Studi Kasus Di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Klaten). Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia. Retrieved from https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/9119
Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Notariil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Abstract viewed = 121 times
PDF downloaded = 137 times
