GOVERNANCE DAN KEGIATAN EKONOMI MASYARAKAT PERBATASAN TIMOR LESTE – INDONESIA (KASUS DAERAH ENCLAVE OECUSSE DENGAN NUSA TENGGARA TIMUR)
Abstract
East Timor is a new country that has borders borders the sea with Australia and Indonesia, as well as the land border with Indonesia. Land border in the District of Bobonaro Regency, Regency of Belu District of Malacca, Covalima district of Malacca and Belu Oecusse Enclave Area, whereas the land borders with North Central Timor Regency and the Regency of Kupang, with the characteristics of the border region nearly the same or similar. Along the border line of 268.8 km2 potential problems. Mapping of the relationship between the State border management cooperation between East Timor and Indonesia from the perspective of the fulfillment of the economic rights of the Community border indicates the existence of three levels of the dimension of the problem, namely: at the local level, level national and regional/international level. Economic and trade views see the border region as a potential for the creation of a region-based development of trade relations between countries that are mutually beneficial. In view of this difference of various macro and micro economic factors between countries able to provide scenarios that could trigger a growth at the border as a platform for the exchange of production factors of profitable. This paper recommends that in addition to security-defense approach than in the border region with the approach ' core-periphery ', the approach of ' cross-border ' with activities of the economy that are ' complementary ' against the economy the neighboring country is a policy that can be reached by the local authorities in the border region to launch the construction of a welfare-based local economy and development in the border region is left behind. Keywords: Governace; Indonesia-Timor Leste Border; The Economic Activities Of The Community BordersReferences
Alamsyah, (2010). Strategi Penguatan Good Governance dalam Mendorong Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Lokal di Era Otonomi Daerah. Jurnal DINAMIKA, 3 (6).
Blanchard, J, F. (2005). “Linking Border Disputes and War: An Institutional-Statist Theoryâ€, Geopolitics, 10, 691.
Darmaputera, R. (2006). Manajemen Perbatasan dan Reformasi Sektor Keamanan, Panduan Pelatihan Tata Kelola Sektor Keamanan Untuk Organisasi Masyarakat Sipil: Sebuah Tookit, Institute For Defense, Security and Peace Studies. IDPS Press: Jakarta.
Fukuyama, F. (2013). What Is Governance?.Center for Global Development 1800 Massachusetts Ave., N W: Washington D C.
Johnston, J. (2004). “Good governance: Rule of law, Transparency and accountability,†Colgate University: New York.
Landellmills, P., & Serageldin, I. (1991). “Governance and the external factorâ€. World Bank Economic Review, 303-320.
Mann, M. (1984), "The Autonomous Power of the State: Its Origins, Mechanisms, and Results". European Journal of Sociology, 25(2), 185-213.
Mexsasai, I. (2015). Political Geography: a contemporary perspective, Tata/Mc. Graw-Hill, New-Delhi.
Poerwadarminta, W, J, S. (2006). Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia.
Rachmawati, I., & Fauzan, (2012). Problem Diplomasi Perbatasan Dalam Tata Kelola Perbatasan Indonesia-Malaysia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik 16(2), 97.
Siburian, R. (2011). Ikatan Budaya Masyarakat Lintas Batas Sebagai Modal Sosial Pembangunan Daerah Perbatasan Di Kabupaten Belu. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Pembangunan, 19(1).
Syamwil, I, B. (2005). Pembangunan Wilayah di Perbatasan Negara Kasus Kalimantan Barat, Laporan Penelitian ITB tahun 2005 20 Desember 2005. Kelompok Keahlian Perumahan dan Permukiman, Departemen Arsitektur, Institut Teknologi Bandung.
United Nations Development Programme (1997).
United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. What is Good Governance?
Wuryanti, G. (2009). Arti Strategis Perbatasan Indonesia – Timor Leste. Dalam Keamanan Di Perbatasan Indonesia – Timor Leste: Sumber Ancaman dan Kebijakan Pengelolaannya (Ed), Pustaka Pelajar – P2P LIPI, 83-84.