HEXAGON FRAUD PERSPECTIVE ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD IN INDONESIA INSURANCE COMPANIES
Abstract
Financial statement fraud is something that causes economic losses and results in a loss of investor confidence. Therefore, company management needs to identify what factors influence the company in committing fraud. One approach to detecting fraud is to use the fraud hexagon model. This model consists of stimulus, opportunity, rationalization, capability, ego, and collusion. This research is explanatory research that aims to investigate the possible factors of financial statement fraud using a fraud hexagon perspective. The objects used as research samples are 15 insurance companies registered on the IDX during 2019 - 2022. This research uses the F-Score model to separate companies that have experienced fraud and uses logistic regression as data analysis. The results of his study show that the elements of opportunity, rationalization, and ego influence financial statement fraud. Meanwhile, the elements of stimulus, capability, and collusion do not affect financial statement fraud.
References
ACFE. (2022). Occupational Fraud 2022: A Report to the nations.
Achmad, T., Ghozali, I., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2022). Hexagon fraud: Detection of fraudulent financial reporting in state-owned enterprises Indonesia. Economies, 10(1), 13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010013
Agusputri, H., & Sofie. (2019). Faktor-Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Fraudulent Financial Reporting Dengan Menggunakan Analisis Fraud Pentagon. Jurnal Informasi Perpajakan, Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Publik, 14(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/: http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/jipak.v14i2.5049
Alfarago, D., Mabrur, A., & Syukur, M. (2023). The likelihood of fraud from the fraud hexagon perspective: evidence from indonesia. ABAC Journal, 43(1), 34–51.
Aviantara, R. (2021). The association between fraud hexagon and government’s fraudulent financial report. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal, 6(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfjournal.v6i1.192
Ayuningrum, L. M., Murni, Y., Astuti, S. B., Pancasila, U., Efektif, P., Auditor, P., Auditor, O., & Keuangan, K. L. (2021). Pengaruh fraud diamond terhadap kecurangan dalam laporan keuangan perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di bursa efek indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Pancasila, 1(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35814/jiap.v1i1.2023
Bawekes, H. F., Simanjuntak, A. M., & Christina Daat, S. (2018). PENGUJIAN TEORI FRAUD PENTAGON TERHADAP FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL REPORTING.
Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Glencoe: Free Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/221475
Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(1), 17–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x
Devi, P. N. C., Widanaputra, A. A. G. P., Budiasih, I. G. A. N., & Rasmini, N. K. (2021). The Effect of Fraud Pentagon Theory on Financial Statements?: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(3), 1163–1169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no3.1163
Fathmaningrum, E. S., & Anggarani, G. (2021). Fraud Pentagon and Fraudulent Financial Reporting?: Evidence from Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia and Malaysia. 22(3). https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v22i3.12538
Fatkhurrizqi, M. A., & Nahar, A. (2021). Analisis Fraud Triangle Dalam Penentuan Terjadinya Financial Statement Fraud. FINANCIAL: Jurnal Akuntansi Published, 7(1), 14–25.
Finansial Bisnis.com. (2021). Asuransi Dominasi Pengaduan Konsumen di Sektor Jasa keuangan.
Handoko, B. L., & Aurelia, E. (2022). Fraud hexagon analysis for detecting potential fraudulent financial reporting in manufacture sector. ICMECG ’21: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Management of e-Commerce and e-Government, 60–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3483816.3483829
Handoko, B. L., Silvia, A., & Salim, J. (2022). Fraud detection using fraud Hexagon Model in Top Index Shares of KOMPAS 100. 2022 the 12th International Workshop on Computer Science and Engineering, Wcse, 978–981. https://doi.org/10.18178/wcse.2022.06.017
Horwath, C. (2011). Why the Fraud Triangle is No Longer Enough.
Imtikhani, L., & Sukirman. (2021). Determinan Fraudulent Financial Statement Melalui Perspektif Fraud Hexagon Theory Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 19(1), 96–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24167/jab.v19i1.3654
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817410.023
Lionardi, M., & Suhartono, S. (2022). Pendeteksian Kemungkinan Terjadinya Fraudulent Financial Statement menggunakan Fraud Hexagon. Moneter - Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 9(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.31294/moneter.v9i1.12496
Maryadi, A. D., Midiastuty, P. P., Suranta, E., & Robiansyah, A. (2020). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Dalam Mendeteksi Fraudulent Financial Reporting ( The influence of fraud pentagon in detecting fraudulent financial reporting ). Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan, Dan Manajemen (Jakman), 2(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35912/jakman.v2i1.104
Mukaromah, I., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2021). Fraud hexagon theory dalam mendeteksi kecurangan laporan Keuangan pada perbankan yang terdaftar di bursa efek indonesia tahun 2015-2019. Jurnal Ilmiah Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 14(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51903/kompak.v14i1.355
Nugroho, D. S., & Diyanty, V. (2022). Fraud hexagon and fraudulent financial statement?: comparison between OMI and beneish model. Atlantis Press, 207(Icemac 2021), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220204.001
Nurchoirunanisa, N., Nuraina, E., & Styaningrum, F. (2020). Financial statement fraud menggunakan fraud pentagon theory pada perusahaan. Review of Accounting & Business, 1(1), 1–17.
Oktaviany, F., & Reskino. (2023). Financial statement fraud: pengujian fraud hexagon dengan moderasi audit commitee. Jurnal Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 25(1), 91–118. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.34208/jba.v25i1.1799
Ozcelik, H. (2020). An Analysis of Fraudulent Financial Reporting Using the Fraud Diamond Theory Perspective: An Empirical Study on the Manufacturing Sector Companies Listed on the Borsa Istanbul. In S. Grima, E. Boztepe, & P. J. Baldacchino (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Audit Management and Forensic Accounting (Vol. 102, pp. 131–153). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-375920200000102012
Pratiwi, A. S., C.C, N. F., & Satyabrata, P. (2022). Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Dan Kepemilikan Institusional Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 2(2), 251–260. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.25105/jet.v2i2.14050 e-ISSN 2339-0840
Putra, N. N. A. N., & Suprasto, H. B. (2021). Penggunaan fraud pentagon dalam mendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan perusahaan perbankan di Indonesia. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 32(1), 168–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2022.v32.i01.p12
Ramdany, Harmenawati, R., & Samukri. (2021). Measuring the level of fraud on financial statements: model of fraud triangle (case studies on companies listed on the indonesia stock exchange in 2014-2018). Jurnal EKOBIS: Ekonomi, Bisnis, & Manajemen, 11(1), 133–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37932/J.E.V11I1.253
Sagala, S. G., & Siagian, V. (2021). Pengaruh Fraud Hexagon Model Terhadap Fraudulent Laporan Keuangan pada Perusahaan Sub Sektor Makanan dan Minuman yang Terdaftar di BEI Tahun 2016-2019. Jurnal Akuntansi, 13(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28932/jam.v13i2.3956
Sari, M. P., Pramasheilla, N., Suryarini, T., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2020). Analysis of fraudulent financial reporting with the role of KAP Big four as a moderation variable: crowe’s fraud’s pentagon theory. International Journal of Financial Research, 11(5). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v11n5p180 Abstract
Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. In M. Hirschey, K. John, & A. K. Makhija (Eds.), Corporate Governance and Firm Performance (Vol. 13, pp. 53–81). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3732(2009)0000013005
Skousen, C. J., & Twedt, B. J. (2009). Fraud in emerging markets: A cross country analysis.
Sumbari, S., Kamaliah, & Fitrios, R. (2023). Analisis model fraud hexagon dalam mendeteksi potensi kecurangan pada laporan keuangan. CURRENT: Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Terkini., 4(1), 179–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31258/current.4.1.179-196
Syaifudin, M. B., & Sumunar, K. I. (2022). Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Pentagon Terhadap Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan ( Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar dalam Daftar LQ 45 Periode 2016-2021 ). Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Manajemen, Dan Akuntansi (JISMA), 1(4), 475–486. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.59004/jisma.v1i4.185
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: the S.C.O.R.E. model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26, 372–381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2017-0128
Wijaya, T., & Witjaksono, A. (2023). Unmasking financial deception?: unraveling the fraud hexagon ’ s influence on detecting financial statement fraud in indonesian. June. https://doi.org/10.21512/jafa.v10i1.9927
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.
Ximenes, T. A. N. A., & Zubaidi, U. I. (2021). Faktor-Faktor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan Pada Laporan Keuangan Dengan Metode Fraud Diamond. Media Bisnis, 13(2), 257–270. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.34208/mb.v13i2.1747
Zhou, R., Yin, J., Feng, Y., Xu, C., & Zhu, R. (2022). Detection of Fraud Statement Using Calculation Models M-Score and F-Score?: Evidence from Chinese Companies Listed in the United States. Digital Inclusive Finance and Regional Economic Quality Development, 780–790. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-036-7_115
Abstract viewed = 107 times
PDF downloaded = 85 times
