Enforcement of the Non-Retroactive Principle in the Bali Bombing Case I in the Constitutional Court of Indonesia Decision Number 013 / PUU-I / 2003
Abstrak
The application of the retroactive principle to the Bali bombing case I based on Law Number 16 of 2003 is intended to provide a sense of justice to the community, but the material review of the application of the retroactive norm was deemed unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court through decision number 013/PUU-I/2003. The pros and cons of this decision occur in the community, between upholding legal certainty or fulfilling a sense of justice for the victims. This paper seeks to examine the decision of the Constitutional Court No. 013/UU-I/2003 by explaining the legal considerations of the Constitutional Court in deciding the case. The research method used in this study is a normative legal research method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. This paper concludes that the non-retroactive principle is an absolute principle that must be enforced because it is one of the principles that guarantees the protection of human rights that cannot be reduced under any circumstances.
Referensi
Ali, Z. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta:Sinar Grafika
Constitutional Court Decision No. 013 / PUU-I / 2003 22 July 2004.
Gunawan, R, (2014). 12-10-2002: Bom Bali I Renggut 202 Nyawa. Liputan6.com. Retrieved from https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/2117622/12-10-2002-bom-bali-i-renggut-202-nyawa.
Hajiji, M. (2013). Relasi Hukum dan Politik Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Rechts Vinding, (2)3, 361-373; retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v2i3.65.
Jayalantara, A. A. N. (2012). Kajian Terhadap Pengecualian Pemberlakuan Asas Nonretroaktif Dalam Kasus Bom Bali I. Universitas Indonesia;
Law Number 15 of 2003 concerning the stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2002 concerning Eradication to Crime of Terrorism, Indonesian State Gazette Year 2003 Number 45, Additional of Indonesian State Gazette Number 4284
Law Number 16 of 2003 concerning the stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 2 of 2002 concerning the enforcement of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2002 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism during the Bomb Blasting in Bali on 12 October 2002 Becomes a Law, Indonesian State Gazette Year 2003 Number 46, Additional of Indonesian State Gazette Number 4285;
Law Number 26 Year 2000 concerning Human Rights Courts, Indonesian State Gazette Year 2000 Number 208, Additional of Indonesian State Gazette Number 4026;
Law Number 39 Year 1999 concerning Human Rights, Indonesian State Gazette Year 1999 Number 165, Additional of Indonesian State Gazette Number 3886;
Raharjo, A. (2008). Problematika Asas Retroaktif Dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 8(1), 70-80; retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2008.8.1.36.
Saleh, R. (1983). Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana: Dua Pengertian Dasar Dalam Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Aksara Baru Aziz, H. M. (2009). Beberapa Catatan Tentang Lahir dan Kinerja Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Sistem Kekuasaan Kehakiman Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 6(3), 13-62;
Salsabila, L., & Annisa, S. F. (2017). Kajian Hak Asasi Manusia dalam Penerobosan Prinsip Non-Rektoraktif pada Pelaku Tindak Pidana Terorisme di Indonesia, Lex Scientia Law Review, 1(1), 57-68; retrieved from https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v1i01.19482.
The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia;
Weda, M. D. (2013). Pengecualian Asas Legalitas Dalam Hukum Pidana. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan., 2(2), 203-223; retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.2.2.2013.203-224.
Widyawati, A. (2011). Dilema Penerapan Asas Retroaktif di Indonesia, Pandecta, 6(2). 170-180; retrieved from https://doi.org/10.15294/pandecta.v6i2.2335.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons-Non Ceomercial-Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA)
Abstrak viewed = 249 times
PDF (English) downloaded = 315 times
