TINJAUAN YURIDIS ASAS KESEIMBANGAN DALAM KONTRAK PENGADAAN BARANG/JASA PEMERINTAH

  • Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa
  • Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Warmadewa
Keywords: Asas Keseimbangan, kedudukan para pihak dalam kontrak

Abstract

Pengadaan barang/jasa bagi keperluan Pemerintah yang menyerap dana APBN/APBD hampir sebesar 60 % akan menciptakan lapangan pekerjaan yang direbut oleh para pengusaha baik pengusaha dalam negeri maupun pengusaha luar negeri karena bangsa Indonesia telah memasuki era globalisasi dan leberalisme perdagangan. Untuk mengantisipasi hal tersebut dengan menerbitkan Peraturan Presiden (Perpres) Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Pengadaan barang/jasa pada dasarnya melibatkan dua pihak, yaitu pihak pengguna barang/jasa (pemerintah) dan pihak penyedia barang/jasa (pengusaha), dengan kepentingan yang berbeda yang sulit dipertemukan kalau tidak ada saling pengertian dan kemauan untuk mencapai kesepakatan. Pengadaan barang/jasa dilakukan dengan melalui tahapan proses pengadaan, yang akhirnya penyedia barang/jasa yang terpilih akan menandatangani kontrak dengan pengguna barang/jasa. Kontrak tersebut memuat kesepakatan antara pengguna barang/jasa sebagai Pihak Pertama dan penyedia barang/jasa sebagai Pihak Kedua. Dalam pembuatan suatu kontrak, para pihak seharusnya memiliki kedudukan yang seimbang, karena apabila tidak memiliki kedudukan yang seimbang, maka dimungkinkan terjadinya salah satu pihak akan mendominasi pihak lain. Bagaimana prinsip keseimbangan diimplementasikan dalam kontrak yang telah ditandatangani kedua belah pihak dibidang pengadaan barang/jasa bagi keperluan Pemerintah di Kabupaten Badung ? Dari hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa; pada kontrak pengadaan barang / jasa bagi keperluan pemerintah di Kabupaten Badung, pada awal kontrak (pra kontrak) memang terlihat bahwa posisi tawar para pihak adalah seimbang. Tetapi jika dicermati pada isi kontrak terlihat ada ketidakseimbangan kedudukan. Asas keseimbangan belum diimplementasikan secara baik di Kabupaten Badung. Procurement of goods / services for the needs of the Government that absorb funds APBN / APBD almost 60% will create employment seized by entrepreneurs both domestic entrepreneurs and foreign businessmen because the nation of Indonesia has entered the era of globalization and trade leberalisme. To anticipate this by issuing Presidential Regulation (Perpres) No. 16 of 2018 on Procurement of Government Goods / Services. Procurement of goods / services basically involves two parties, namely the user of goods / services (government) and the provider of goods / services (entrepreneurs), with different interests that are difficult to meet if there is no mutual understanding and willingness to reach an agreement. Procurement of goods / services is done by going through the stages of the procurement process, which ultimately providers of goods / services selected will sign a contract with the user goods / services. The contract contains an agreement between the user of the goods / services as the First Party and the provider of goods / services as the Second Party. In making a contract, the parties should have a balanced position, because if it does not have a balanced position, then it is possible that one party will dominate the other. How is the principle of balance implemented in contracts signed by both parties in the field of procurement of goods / services for the purposes of the Government in Badung regency? From result of research known that; in the contract of procurement of goods / services for government purposes in Badung regency, at the beginning of the contract (pre contract) it is seen that the bargaining position of the parties is balanced. But if you look at the content of the contract there is an unbalanced position. The principle of balance has not been well implemented in Badung regency.

References

Books

Budiono, Herlien, 2006, “Asas Keseimbangan bagi Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia, Hukum Perjanjian Berlandaskan Asas-Asas Wigati Indonesiaâ€, Citra Aditya Bhakti, Bandung.

Ginny Pearson Barnes, “Successful Negotiatingâ€, Advantage Quest Publications.

Hardjowiyono, Budihardjo & Hayie Muhammad. 2007. Prinsip-prinsip Dasar Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Cet. Kedua. Jakarta. Kementrian Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara.

Hernoko, Agus Yudha. 2010. hukum Perjanjian Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Kontrak Komersial. Ed. 1. Cet. 1. Kencana, Jakarta

Indrati, Maria Farida. 1998. Ilmu Perundang-undangan, Dasar-Dasar dan Pembentukannya. Jakarta. Kanisius.

Indroharto. 1995. Perbuatan Pemerintahan Menurut Hukum Publik dan Hukum Perdata. Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta.

Articles

Bakir, S., Khan, S., Ahsan, K., & Rahman, S. (2018). Exploring the Critical Determinants of Environmentally Oriented Public Procurement Using the DEMATEL Method. Journal of Environmental Management.

Bruno, T., Gelderman, C. J., Lambrechts, W., & Semeijn, J. (2018). The promise of Best Value Procurement: Governance and (in) stability of specifications within an innovative biogas project. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 1465–1475.

Gunderson, L. H., Cosens, B., & Garmestani, A. S. (2016). Adaptive governance of riverine and wetland ecosystem goods and services. Journal of Environmental Management, 183, 353–360.

Hu, Q., Zhang, Z., & Lim, A. (2016). Transportation service procurement problem with transit time. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 86, 19–36.

Kavanagh, P. (2016). A case for negotiated performance-based contracting rather than competitive tendering in government public transport (bus) service procurement. Research in Transportation Economics, 59, 313–322.

Li, J., & Shi, V. (2017). The benefit of horizontal decentralization in durable good procurement. Omega (United Kingdom).

Obwegeser, N., & Müller, S. D. (2018). Innovation and public procurement: Terminology, concepts, and applications. Technovation, 74–75(March), 1–17.

Wynstra, F., Rooks, G., & Snijders, C. (2018). How is service procurement different from goods procurement? Exploring ex ante costs and ex post problems in IT procurement. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 24(2), 83–94.

Published
2018-08-14
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 505 times
PDF downloaded = 1185 times