Dispute Resolution on Agreements Fiduciary in Tort Settlement (Case Study in PT. Adira Multi Dynamics Finance Tbk, Denpasar II Branch)
Abstract
Phenomena that often occur in decision making or policies which of course are based on applicable regulations or agreements are confiscation or taking guarantees or otherwise the submission of guarantees by the debtor due to a default or unable to carry out their obligations properly. As many have done, it can be seen from the data in PT. Adira Dinamika Multi Finance Tbk, Denpasar II Branch. Based on this background, the formulation of the problem found is how is the form of dispute resolution regarding the fiduciary agreement in the settlement of default at PT. Adira Dinamika Multi Finance Tbk, Denpasar II Branch, and What are the obstacles faced in the execution of fiduciary guarantees at PT. Adira Dinamika Multi Finance Tbk, Denpasar II Branch?This type of research uses empirical legal research methods. The nature of this research is descriptive. Data and Data Sources used are primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques used are observations, interviews and documentation. After the data is collected, it is analyzed using qualitative analysis methods. The conclusion of this research is the form of dispute resolution at PT. Adira Dinamika Multi Finance Tbk, Denpasar II Branch is divided into 2 stages, namely non-litigation efforts and litigation efforts. Constraints faced in the execution of fiduciary collateral goods at PT. Adira Dinamika Multi Finance Tbk, Denpasar II Branch is in executing the goods that have been transferred by the debtor of the goods. but as a result of the acknowledgment of the droit de suite principle that fiduciary security rights follow the object in the hands of whoever the object is.
References
Amriani, N. (2012). Mediasi Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Arbysupriyadi, S. (2020). Reconstruction of the Guarantee’s Objects in the Fiduciary Agreement in Indonesia. Jurnal Universidad del Zulia, 25(1).
Dewi, N. M. T. (2021). Kedudukan Penerima Fidusia Dalam Pembebanan Jaminan Fidusia Yang Dibuat Dengan Akta Dibawah Tangan. Kerta Dyatmika, 18(2), 1–10.
Harahap, M. Y. (2008). Civil Procedure Law concerning Lawsuits, Trials, Seizures, Proofs and Court Decisions. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Husni Hasbulah, F. (2009). Civil Law of Truth, Rights - The Right to Give Guarantees. Jakarta: CV. INDHIL CO.
Ilham Maulana, E. R. G. (2023). Objective Rights For Financing Companies As Fiduciary Guarantee Holder. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan, 7(1).
Indradewi, A. A. S. N. (2020). The Substance of the Law of Norm Blurring on Copyright Transfer. Journal of Civic Education Undiksha, 8(3).
Kantaatmadja, K. (2011). Some Things About Arbitration. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakri.
Muhammad, A. (2011). Perikatan Law. Bandung: PT. Image of Aditya Bakti.
Nugroho, S. A. (2009). Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jakarta: Telaga Ilmu Indonesia.
Prodjodikoro, R. W. (2011). Principles of The Law of Agreements. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.
Rahmadi, D. (2017). Dispute Resolution Mediation Through a Consensus Approach. Jakarta: PT. King Grafindo Persada.
Saliman, A. R. (2004). The Essence of Indonesian Business Law. Jakarta: Kencana.
Suharnoko. (2015). Law of Agreement Theory and Case Analysis. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons-Non Ceomercial-Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA)
Abstract viewed = 71 times
PDF downloaded = 118 times
