Sanksi Kasepekang Dalam Hukum Adat Bali

  • I Ketut Sukadana Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa
  • Diah Gayatri Sudibya Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa
  • Ni Made Sukaryati Karma Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa
Keywords: Balinese Customary Law, Violation Of Awig-Awig, Customary Sanctions, Exclusion

Abstract

Traditional villages in Bali as now regulated through the Bali Provincial Regulation Number 4 of 2019, have the same government system. Activities carried out in traditional villages cover the custom and religious fields, where a traditional village in Bali has its own customary rules which are outlined in the village awig-awig. Customary village government is autonomous, meaning that each customary village has its own rules which only apply to the residents of the village / banjar concerned. In general, the rules contained in awig-awig must not at all conflict with the prevailing regulations at the national or regional levels. But in reality there are still awig-awig in some traditional villages that contain sanctions that are no longer suitable to the times, such as still applying the Kasepekang customary sanction, namely exclusion from the association of living together. The exclusion of members of the community is not half-hearted, and some have even closed off access to the outside of their home yard. The problems examined in this study: (1) the regulation of sanctions in Balinese customary law, and (2) the factors that become the reasons for the implementation of the kasepekang customary sanctions. This type of research is empirical with data collection techniques using interviews with informants. Based on the research results, it can be said that the customary sanctions arrangements are listed in the awig-awig of each customary village, namely indik pamidanda (regarding sanctions); As for the reason that the kasepekang sanction is still being applied in people's lives is because the person concerned is outrageous and difficult to foster, besides this type of sanction is stated in awig-awig so that the prajuru adat (traditional leader) still has a legal basis to apply it.

References

Artadi, I. K. (2003). Hukum Adat Bali Dengan Aneka Masalahnya. Denpasar: Pustaka Bali Post.

Koesnoe, M. (1979). Catatan-catatan Terhadap Hukum Adat Dewasa Ini. Surabaya: Airlangga. University Press.

Ranggawidjaja, R. (1998). Pengantar Ilmu Perundang-Undangan Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Samosir, D. (2013). Hukum Adat Indonesia, Eksistensi dalam Dinamika Perkembangan Hukum di Indonesia. Bandung: CV. Nuansa Auli.

Sirtha, I. N. (2008). Aspek Hukum Dalam Konflik Adat di Bali. Denpasar: Universitas Udayana.

Suartha, I. D. M. (2015). Hukum dan Sanksi Adat, Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Malang: Setara Press.

Sudantra, I. K., & Parwata, A. A. (2006). Memahami Awig-awig Desa Pakaraman, Pamidanda, Pemberdayaan Desa Pakraman Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara di Luar Pengadilan. Denpasar: Udayana University Press.

Wibawa, G. Y. S., & Wiradnyana, I. G. A. (2017). Implementasi Hukum Adat Dengan Sanksi Kasepekang Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Pariksa, 1(1). Retrieved from https://jurnal.stahnmpukuturan.ac.id/index.php/pariksa/article/view/648

Windia, W. P. (2014). Hukum Adat Bali Aneka Kasus Dan Penyelesaiannya. Denpasar: Udayana University Press.

Windia, W. P., & Sudantra, I. K. (2006). Pengantar Hukum Adat Bali. Denpasar: Udayana University Press.

Published
2021-01-29
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 795 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 10300 times