Komunikasi NonVerbal Dalam Praktik Peradilan Pidana Dengan Kewenangan Melakukan Interpretasi Hukum

  • Rocky Marbun Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pancasila
Keywords: Communication, Criminal Procedure Law, Interpretation, Legal Semiotics

Abstract

The logical consequence of submitting to the civil law system - one of which is paper working or administrative mindedness. As characterized by Article 75 of the Criminal Procedure Code, that is, every legal action must be in the form of an Investigation Report (BAP). Thus, a BAP is a legal document that contains information for Law Enforcement Officials (APH) to obtain a description of a criminal event. Normative Legal Studies, in essence, focus on APH activities to interpret legal documents in order to be able to bring up a legal decision. Thus, legal practitioners and academics forget about the ability of APH as an ordinary human being who can build a non-verbal communication in relation to the legal decisions it will make. Therefore, this study focuses on a form of non-verbal communication that has an influence on the praxis realm of legal science, namely by asking the problem is "how is the influence of non-verbal communication in the criminal justice process on the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia?" In order to answer this problem, the researcher used the Normative Juridical Research Method as a logical consequence in law based on secondary data through library research. In order to complement this research, the researcher used several models of research approaches, namely the philosophical approach, the semiotic approach, and the hermeneutic approach, with the analysis method being qualitative analysis. The results of the study indicate that there are efforts to marginalize legal interpretation as a basis for making decisions, by promoting non-verbal communication in criminal justice practices.

References

Atmasasmita, R. (2011). Sistem Peradilan Pidana Kontemporer. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Danesi, M. (2010). Pesan, Tanda dan Makna. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.

Gintings, A. (2008). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Humaniora.

Hartini, L. (2014). Bahasa & Produk Hukum. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Ibrahim, J. (2012). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Banyumedia.

Indrayanti, T. (2015). Potret Penggunaan Bahasa Remaja Dalam Perspektif Kalangan Mahasiswa. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional PRASASTI II (pp. 126–131). Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosidingprasasti/article/view/88

Katrini, Y. E. (2014). Fenomena Bahasa di Lapangan: Sebuah Kajian Kualitatif. Ragam Jurnal Pengembangan Humaniora, 14(1), 15–21. Retrieved from https://jurnal.polines.ac.id/index.php/ragam/article/view/488/413

Kurniati, D. P. Y. (2016). Modul Komunikasi Verbal dan Non Verbal (Komunikasi Kesehatan). Universitas Udayana Program Studi Kesehatan Masyarakat. Retrieved from https://simdos.unud.ac.id/uploads/file_pendidikan_dir/a3a4fc3bf4ad19b0079f4a31c593398b.pdf

Kusumawati, T. I. (2016). Komunikasi Verbal dan Nonverbal. Jurnal Al-Irsyad, 6(2), 83–98. Retrieved from http://jurnal.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/al-irsyad/article/downloadSuppFile/6618/999

Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2011). Theories of Human Communication. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Mudjiyanto, B., & Nur, E. (2013). Semiotika Dalam Metode Penelitian Komunikasi. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, Informatika Dan Media Massa, 16(1). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.30818/jpkm.2013.1160108

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7 Tahun 2015 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Kepaniteraan dan Kesekretariatan Peradilan

Pontier, J. A. (2008). Rechtsvinding (Penemuan Hukum), [Bernard Arief Sidharta-Pent.]. Bandung: Jendela Mas Pustaka.

Rasjidi, L., & Putra, I. B. W. (2012). Hukum Sebagai Suatu Sistem. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rokhman, M. A. (1999). Semiotika Sebagai Teori Membaca Dan Problemnya: Sebuah Catatan Singkat. Jurnal Humaniora, 11(2). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.22146/jh.664

Sobur, A. (2013). Semiotika Komunikasi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Soekanto, S. (2012). Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakkan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Soekanto, S. (2014). Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakkan Hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sudirman, A. (2007). Hati Nurani Hakim dan Putusannya: Suatu Pendekatan dari Perspektif Ilmu Hukum Perilaku (Behavioral Jurisprudence) Kasus Hakim Bismar Siregar. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Suhariyanto, B. (2014). Quo Vadis: Status Jabatan dan Sistem Karir Kepaniteraan Peradilan. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 3(1), 11–24. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.25216/jhp.3.1.2014.11-24

Suryani, I. (2013). Komunikasi Interpersonal dan Iklim Komunikasi Dalam Organisasi. Jurnal Dakwah Tabligh, 4(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.24252/jdt.v14i1.318

Susanto, A. F. (2004). Wajah Peradilan Kita: Konstruksi Sosial tentang Penyimpangan, Mekanisme Kontrol dan Akuntabilitas Peradilan Pidana. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman

Vera, N. (2015). Semiotika Dalam Riset Komunikasi. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Waljinah, S. (2016). Linguistik Forensik Interogasi: Kajian Makna Simbolik Bahasa Hukum Pada Tindakan Diskresi Polisi. In Prosiding Prasasti. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosidingprasasti/article/view/1666/0

Waskito, A. B. (2018). Implementasi Sistem Peradilan Pidana Dalam Perspektif Integrasi. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1(1), 287–304. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v1i1.2648

Wicaksono, L. (2016). Bahasa dalam Komunikasi Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pembelajaran Prospektif, 1(2), 9–19. Retrieved from https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/lp3m/article/download/19211/16053

Published
2021-01-29
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 390 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 958 times