Upaya Non Penal Terhadap Tindak Pidana  Pencurian Bernilai Ringan di Mini Market

Gusti Ayu Euanggelin Marsha Wangania; Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi; I Made Minggu Widyantara

doi:10.22225/jkh.3.3.5309.488-492

Gusti Ayu Euanggelin Marsha Wangania
Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi Universitas Warmadewa
I Made Minggu Widyantara Universitas Warmadewa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.3.3.5309.488-492

Abstract

Crime is a problem that arises from many factors that support it where there is a violation of the rules that should be obeyed by the community itself, and it is undeniable that the crime comes from the community. Some cases of criminal acts are also caused by economic problems, theft is a common crime, where someone robs another person of wealth or objects. The purpose of this study is to find out the settlement of the crime of theft of light value in mini markets with non-penal alternatives, and the obstacles to solving the crime of theft of light value in mini markets with non-penal alternatives. The type of research used in this research is empirical legal research, the sources of legal material are obtained by conducting interviews and literature studies. The results of the study indicate that the settlement of the crime of minor theft in the mini market is by non-penal efforts, which can be carried out with preventive efforts, namely efforts that can be made before the occurrence of a crime by dealing with the factors driving the occurrence of a crime. In terms of solving the problem of minor crimes, there is one solution that is considered to be able to humanize humans, namely Restorative Justice. There are 2 (two) obstacles in resolving cases of theft of light value in mini markets with non-penal alternatives, namely internal and external factors.

References

Azizah, N. (2017). Konsekuensi Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pencurian oleh Anak Pasca Dikeluarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 Mengenai Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan dan Jumlah Denda dalam KUHP. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Kalimantan, IX(1), 107â€“115.

Iryana, & Kawasati, R. (2019). Teknik Pengumpulan Data: Metode Kualitatif.

Madari, M. S. K. (2013). Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan dan Jumlah Denda Dalam Kuhp Terhadap Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencurian (Analisis Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 02 Tahun 2012 Tentang Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan dan Jumlah Denda Dalam Kuhp). Jurnal Cita Hukum, 1(2).

Moeljatno. (1993). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

P.A.F, L. (1984). Dasar-dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Dasar-dasar Untuk Mempelajari Hukum Pidana yang Berlaku di Indonesia). Bandung, Sinar Baru.

Rimba, S. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian pada Malam Hari di Minimarket yang buka 24 Jam. Universitas Jember, 7(2), 107â€“115.

Sukranatha, A. A. K. (2011). Unsur Melawan Hukum dalam Pasal 362 KUHP Tentang Tindak Pidana Pencurian. Universitas Udayana, 1â€“5.

Syafiq, A. (2014). Rekonstruksi Pemidanaan Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam (Perspektif Filsafat Hukum). Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 1(2), 178.

Syahputra, M. S. H. (2020). Analisa Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pencurian Ringan Melalui Restorative Justice (Studi Kasus Polsek Senapelan Kota Pekanbaru) (Vol. 1, Issue 1) [Universitas Islam Riau].

Wahid, A., & Labib, M. (2005). Kejahatan Mayantara (Cyber Crime). Refika Aditama.