Efektivitas Bantuan Hukum Advokat di Pos Bantuan Hukum (Posbakum) Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Kelas I A
Abstract
The development of the concept of a rule of law is a product of history, because the formulation or definition of a rule of law is constantly developing in line with the development of human resources. The state is obliged to provide legal assistance with the aim of protecting and prospering the community, this is in accordance with Article 27 paragraph (1) of the 1945 constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, it is stated that all citizens are equal before the law. The purpose of this research is to explain the position of the legal aid post (Posbakum) in the Denpasar District Court Class IA in providing legal assistance to defendants whose sentence is over 5 years and to find out the factors of constraints for the assistance post (Posbakum) in the Denpasar District Court. This research is designed using empirical legal research with a statutory approach, then the data sources used are primary and secondary data. The data collection procedure was carried out by means of interviews and records, which were then analyzed using descriptive qualitative methods. The results showed that the legal assistance provided by lawyers at the legal aid post (Posbakum) at the Denpasar District Court Class IA was effective because it had carried out the provision of law to the underprivileged community either through direct appointment by the judge or through submission of a letter from the poor. according to Law No. 11 of 2011 concerning Legal Aid and in accordance with the MoU which was signed between the Denpasar District Court Class 1 A and the legal aid post. As for the factors that were often faced by the aid post (Posbakum), namely the defendant himself, namely that the family of the defendant was difficult to find to ask for a statement of incapacity and the community's low knowledge of legal aid facilities.
References
Apriansyah, N. (2020). Problematika Pemberian Bantuan Hukum Struktural dan Nn Struktural Kaitannya dengan Asas Equality Before the Law. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 14(3), 539–552.
Bambang Tri Bawono. (2011). Tinjauan Yuridis Hak-Hak Tersangka dalam Pemeriksaan Pendahuluan. Jurnal Hukum, 26(2), 551–570.
Caecilia, W., & Sondakh, J. (2014). Pemenuhan Hak atas Perumahan yang Layak bagi Masyarakat Miskin di Perkotaan (Suatu Kajian dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia). Jurnal LPPM Bidang Eko SosBudkum, 1(2), 86–102.
Fauzi, S. I., & Ningtyas, I. P. (2018). Optimalisasi Pemberian Bantuan Hukum Demi Terwujudnya Access to Law and Justice Bagi Rakyat Miskin. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(1), 50–72.
Prabowo, A. (2017). Peran Pos Bantuan Hukum (Posbakum) di Pengadilan Agama Bengkulu Kelas I A Berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2014. Jurnal Qiyas, 2(2), 197–209.
Rajagukguk, T. (2016). Efektifitas Pos Bantuan Hukum Pengadilan sebagai Pemberi Layanan Bantuan Hukum Cuma-Cuma pada Perkara Pidana pada Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum, 3(1), 1–15.
Ramdan, A. (2014). Bantuan Hukum Sebagai Kewajiban Negara untuk Memenuhi Hak Konstitusional Fakir Miskin. Jurnal Konstitusi, 11(2), 85–108.
Samadi, Y. P. (2015). Kewajiban Penyidik dalam Melakukan Pemeriksaan terhadap Tersangka. Lex Crimen, 4(4), 92–99.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Wadi, F. (2010). Bantuan Hukum dan Implementasi Perlindungan HAM di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 11(1), 21–31.
Abstract viewed = 639 times
PDF downloaded = 1114 times
