Hukuman Mati dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2-3/Puu-V/2007

Christofel Brayn Leonard  Totomutu; I Ny Oman Gede  Sugiartha; I Made Minggu  Widyantara

doi:10.22225/jkh.2.2.3256.361-366

Christofel Brayn Leonard Totomutu Univesitas Warmadewa
I Ny Oman Gede Sugiartha Univesitas Warmadewa
I Made Minggu Widyantara Univesitas Warmadewa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.2.3256.361-366

Abstract

The capital punishment is regulated in several laws and regulations in Indonesia, in particular for narcotics crimes that are submitted for judicial review against the Constitution. The type of research used is the type of normative. The sources of the data used in this research are primary, which are taken from the original source of the law and secondary materials are materials derived from books, journals and scientific works and tertiary legal materials. The technique of collecting data in this research is carried out by collecting existing materials or studying documents from existing laws and regulations as well as the decisions of the constitutional court judges and explaining the sentence by using the legal material processing method systematically. The purpose of this research was to determine the capital punishment for narcotics crime in terms of human rights and to find out the judges considerations on the capital punishment for narcotics crime in Indonesia based on the decision of the constitutional court number 2-3/PUU-V/2007. The results of the research revealed that the capital punishment for narcotics crime has been stated in articles and laws, but on the other hand there is a consideration of the panel of judges regarding the capital punishment case for narcotics crime that the capital punishment in the Narcotics Law does not contradict human rights and human rights as in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia because the guarantee of human rights and the right to life in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia does not adhere to absolute principles.

References

Anugrah, R., Desril, R., & Disemadi, H. S. (2020). Pidana Mati Terhadap Kejahatan Narkotika Ditinjau dari Pasal 28I Ayat (1) UUD NRI 1945. Jurnal KERTHA WICAKSANA: Sarana Komunikasi Dosen Dan Mahasiswa, 14(2), 110â€“117.

Apeldoorn, LJ. Van. (2004). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Cet.30. Jakarta.

Arfa, N., Nur, S., & Monita, Y. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Penerapan dan Pelaksanaan Hukuman Mati Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengedar Narkotika Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 Tentang Narkotika. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 4(2), 526â€“537.

Chazawi, Adami. (2019). Pelajaran Hukum Pidana, Cet.9. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.

Ikhwanuddin. (2018). Tinjauan Yuridis tentang Penjatuhan Hukuman Mati Terhadap Perantara Jual Beli Narkotika yang Disertai dengan Pencucian Uang (Studi Putusan Nomor 594/pid.sus/2015/pn.Tjb). Jurnal ProintegritÃ , 2(1), 49â€“69.

Lintong, Abraham Mononutu. (2018). Hukuman Mari Di Indonesia Suatu Kajian Etika Kristen, Cet.l, Percikan Hati, Tomohon.

Sahetapy, J.E. (1979). Ancaman Pidana Mari Terhadap Pembunuhan Berencana. Alumni Bandung, Bandung.

Sembel, N. S. G., Kumendong, W. J., & Waha, C. J. J. (2020). Penerapan Pidana Mati Terhadap Pengedar Narkotika Ditinjau dari Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Lex Et Societatis, 8(3), 5â€“15.

Suseno, Magnis. (1987) Etika Politik (Prinsip-Prinsip Moral Dasar Kenegaraan Modern). Gramedia, Jakarta.

Wardana, I. W. (2014). Kebijakan Formulasi Pidana Mati dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika di Indonesia. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 2(2), 265â€“284.