Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Kreditur Pemegang Jaminan Fidusia yang Dipindah Tangankan

  • I Made Suarja
  • Simon Nahak Universitas Warmadewa
  • I Ketut Widia Universitas Warmadewa
Keywords: Fiduciary execution; Registration of the fiduciary; Legal Protection

Abstract

This research was conducted based on fiduciary guarantee of execution provided for in Article 29 of Act No. 42 of the year 1999 about Fiduciary Guarantee stating that the fiduciary guarantee execution can be carried out by means of the execution of the title eksekutorial, the distribution of sale through the society, or sale under the hand with the consent of both parties. However, in practice when it will do the execution of fiduciary guarantee, guarantee that turned out to be transferable and controlled by third parties without the consent of the borrower. Formulation of the problem in this study was 1. The requirements are to be met by the lender in order to have the power of doing execution in granting credit Guarantee Chattels? 2. How is the legal protection for the lender that guarantees Fiduciary transferable? The purpose of the research to know the procedure of obtaining legal protection for holders of a Fiduciary which is transferable. The theory is a theory of legal certainty and the protection of the law. This type of research approach with normative approach legislation and the approach to the case. The first discussion about the terms of execution of fiduciary guarantee and second set of laws regarding a lender to Fiduciary redirected. The result of the research showed that if not created by notariil and registered office at Fiduciary, then their execution procedures can only be done with the setting of the ruling of the District Court. Procedures and procedures binding guarantee of fiduciary fiduciary registration procedures on Fiduciary Office, are not set or are not found in detail in the Law Number 42 Year 1999.

References

Ahmad, B. (2008). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.

Hapsari, K. I. (2017). Kajian Yuridis Eksekusi Obyek Jaminan Fidusia yang Dialihkan kepada Pihak Ketiga. Jurnal Repertorium, 4(1), 45–51.

Isnaeni, M. (2016). Pengantar Hukum Jaminan Kebendaan. Surabaya: PT. Revka Petra Media.

Marzuki, P. M. (2009). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Muhamad, A. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Muhtar, M. M. (2013). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Kreditur pada Perjanjian Fidusia dalam Praktek. Lex Privatum, 1(2), 1–18.

Pasaribu, E. M., Minin, D., Marlina, & Ramadhan, M. C. (2019). Analisis Hukum terhadap Benda Jaminan Fidusia yang Digadaikan oleh Debitur Kepada Pihak Lain. ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum, 1(1), 42–54.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2006). Penelitian Hukum Normatif Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Published
2020-10-28
Abstract viewed = 279 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 1218 times