Kedudukan Sumpah Pemutus dalam Pembuktian Sengketa Tanah Waris
Abstract
This study is motivated by the phenomenon of inherited land disputes that often occur in the community. When the distribution of inheritance is not fair, the heirs can file a lawsuit in court according to the choice of law, both in western civil law and in customary law. This study aims to determine the procedure for the breaker's oath in inherited land disputes and to analyze the power of proof of the breaker's oath in inherited land disputes. This study uses a normative research method with the aim of analyzing the obscurity of norms regarding the proof of the breaker's oath. The data used comes from legal materials such as statutory regulations, Civil Code, HIR or RBg and Jurisprudence. The results of the analysis show that the procedure for the breaker's oath in inherited land disputes is the breaker's oath (oath decisoir) which is charged at the request of one party to the opponent. The types of breaking oaths or decisoir oaths can be in the form of pocong oaths, pulpit vows, pagoda oaths, and cast oaths which are known in Hindu society in Bali. An oath of decision making in inherited land disputes, namely an oath of decision made when there is no attempt to prove anything in a case. Then, the power of proof of the breaker's oath is seen in Decision Number 148 / PDT.G / 2016 / PN GIN, that the power of proof of the breaker's oath has the power to decide cases or disputes which have the value of perfect proving power, binding and determining
References
Amiruddin, & Asikin, Z. (2004). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Elizabeth, N. (2015). Hukum Pembuktian Analisis Terhadap Kemandirian Hakim Sebagai Penegak Hukum Dalam Proses Pembuktian. Medan: CV Nuansa Aulia.
Imron, A., & Iqbal, M. (2019). Hukum Pembuktian. (A. D. Harapan & Suhendra, Eds.). Tangerang Selatan: UNPAM Press.
Kaligis, R. Y. J. (2017). Penggunaan Alat Bukti Sumpah Pemutus (Decisoir) dalam Proses Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan Menurut Teori dan Praktek. Jurnal Hukum Unsrat, 23(8), 1–14.
Malek, M. S. M. A., Jeniwaty, M. J., Sulaiman, M., & Harun, S. M. (2015). In the Purview of an Oath from the Jurisprudential Method of Islamic Law of Evidence. In R. Omar, H. Bahrom, & G. de Mello (Eds.), Islamic Perspectives Relating to Business, Arts, Culture and Communication. Singapore: Springer.
Olaofe, M. A., & Shittu, A. B. (2014). Oath and its Implications from Islamic Perspective. Allawh Journal of Arabic and Islamic Studies, 4(1), 191–202.
Sudikno, M. (2002). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Suriyaman, M. (2014). Hukum Adat, Dahulu, Kini dan Akan Datang. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Syaiful, B. (2018). Dinamika Hukum Pembuktian dalam Capaian Keadilan (I). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Nusa Bali,â€Tiada Bukti Kepemilikan, Tergugat Disumpah Cor di Pura Ulun Kulkulâ€, NusaBali.com, January 2017, p.1, accessed on 11 November 2018 at 21.30 WITA.
http://www.gresnews.com/berita/tips/81539-penyelesaian-sengketa-tanah-warisan/ accessed on 29 October 2018 at 19.40 WITA.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
HIR (Herzein Inlandsch Reglement)
RBg (Rechtreglement voor de Buitengeweten)
Yurisprudensi Mahkamah Agung No. 575 K/Sip/1973
Putusan Nomor 148/PDT.G/2016/PN GIN.