Genosida Sebagai Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Yang Berat
Abstract
Deprivation of Human Rights using various criminal methods has been happening for a long time. Since then, many international regulations have set limits and prohibitions regarding war crimes up to genocide, including judicial bodies that are given responsibility for crimes that have been committed. By knowing the actions and bodies authorized to prosecute serious human rights violations, we can understand current changes in the existence of the crime of genocide. The aim of realizing international legal instruments is to fulfill the human rights of victims, the world community and perpetrators. The research method used is normative juridical. The research approach is through a statute approach, which examines problems using statutory regulations by analyzing relevant laws to be used as a legal basis, such as the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in 1948, the Statute of the International Criminal Court in 1998 and the Law on Law Number 25 of 2000 concerning Human Rights Courts. The research results concluded that the crime of genocide is one of four serious human rights violations within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court. Genocide always involves two things, namely: objectively it refers to the act of extermination and subjectively the target of the action is a certain group. The International Criminal Court, in accordance with Article 34 of the 1998 Rome Statute, consists of four parts: The Presidency, the Chambers, the Offices of the Prosecutors and the Registry in carrying out its duties. The International Criminal Court will only carry out its functions if the National Court cannot carry out its functions properly, in this case the meaning is if the National Court does not want to try the perpetrator of the crime and unable.
References
________ & Erna Dewi. (2016). Hukum Pidana Internasional Dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Bandar Lampung: Justice Publisher.
Aji, Dimas dkk. (2019). Kajian Tentang Tanggung Jawab Negara Akibat Korban Kejahatan Genosida Di Darfur Sudan Tahun 2010. Soedirman Law Review. 1(1), 33-42 https://doi.org/10.20884/1.slr.2019.1.1.28
Amadea, Ratu Sheeva, Danial & Surya Anom. (2023). Tindakan Balasan Atas Persona Non Grata Terhadap Pejabat Diplomatik Amerika Serikat Oleh Rusia Berdasarkan Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961. Yustisia Tirtayasa. 3(1), 73–81 http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/yta.v3i1.15380
Audia, Nurma. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Pelanggaran Ham Berat: Tinjauan Hukum Nasional Dan Internasional. Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam. 5(1), 14-29 https://doi.org/10.32505/legalite.v5i1.1464
Diantha, I Made Pasek. (2014). Hukum Pidana Internasional Dalam Dinamika Pengadilan Pidana Internsional. Jakarta. Kencana
Fatahillah. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Negara Terhadap Tindak Pidana Internasional (State Liability For International Criminal Acts). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Reusam. 9(2), 14-24 https://doi.org/10.29103/reusam.v9i2.6662
Hassanah, Hetty. (2017). Genosida Dalam Ketentuan Hukum Nasional Sebagai Kejahatan Tradisional. Maleo Law Jurnal. 1(2), 217-235 https://doi.org/10.56338/mlj.v1i2.75
Heard, Andrew. (1997). Human Rights: Chimeras In Sheep’s Clothing. Journal Introduction to Human Rights Theory
Ibrahim, Jhonny. (2008). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang:Bayumedia
Juwana, Hikmahanto. (1999). Mahkamah Pidana Internasional. Jurnal Hukum. 11(6), 69-78
Mangku, Dewa Gede Sudika & Kadek Astiti Narayani. (2022). The Dangers of The Crime of Genocide: International Law Review. Journal Of Judicial Review. 24(1), 81-90 http://dx.doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v24i1.6467
Mardiyanto, Ibnu. (2023). Konsekuensi Yuridis Penerapan Yurisdiksi Mahkamah Pidana Internasional Terhadap Eksistensi Pengadilan Nasional dalam Mengadili Kejahatan Internasional. Jurnal Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan. 14(1), 68-84 http://dx.doi.org/10.22212/jnh.v14i1.3774
Martin, Elizabeth A. (2002). A Dictionary of Law. New York: Oxford University Press
Muhammad, Fadil, Luh Putu Sudini & I Nyoman Sujana. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Pidana Internasional Dalam Kejahatan Perang Terhadap Kemanusiaan. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum. 1(2), 88-92 https://doi.org/10.22225/jph.1.2.2381.88-92
Nirwana, Muhammad Alfaruq. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Terkait Kejahatan Genosida Dalam Konteks Hukum Internasional. Journal Legal Dialectics. 3(1), 1-13
Novianti,Vera dkk. (2023). Perkembangan Kejahatan Internasional dalam Hukum Pidana Internasional: Tinjauan Pertanggungjawaban oleh Peradilan Ad Hoc. Sultan Jurisprudance: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum. 3(1), 51-61 http://dx.doi.org/10.51825/sjp.v3i1.18035
Prasatya, Didi. (2013). Eksistensi Mahkamah Pidana Internasional (International Criminal Court) Dalam Penyelesaian Kasus Tindak Pidana Terorisme. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion. 2(1), 1-12
Prasetyo, Mujiono Hafidh. (2020). Kejahatan Genosida Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional. Jurnal Gema Keadilan. 7(3), 115-138 https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.9075
Raharja, Made Adityawarman Hardi & M. Jodi Setianto. (2022). Penanganan Perkara Internasional Yang Dilakukan Oleh International Criminal Court. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha. 10(3), 253-259 https://doi.org/10.23887/jpku.v10i3.52031
Rahmadhani, Alifiyah Fitrah & Dodi Jaya Wardana. (2023). Penyelesaian Pelanggaran HAM Berat di Indonesia. Unes Law Review. 6(1), 2799-2807 https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev
Setiyono, Joko. (2020). Peradilan Internasional Atas kejahatan HAM Berat. Demak: Pustaka Magister.
Shaw, Malcolm N. (2013). Hukum Internasional. Bandung: Nusa Media.
Siswanto, Arie. (2005). Yurisdiksi Material Mahkamah Kejahatan Internasional. Bogor:Ghalia Indonesia.
Siswanto, Heni. (2008). Bahan Kuliah Hukum Pidana Internasional dan Hak Asasi Manusia
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji. (2014). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Sriyani, Ade. (2018). Peran International Criminal Court Dalam Menangani Crimes Against Humanity di Myanmar (Kasus Rohingya). Semarang. Skripsi.
Sujarwo, Herman. (2017). Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) Berat Dalam Instrumen Hukum Internasional. Syariati: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur’an dan Hukum. 3(2), 239-248 https://doi.org/10.32699/syariati.v3i02.1156
Suteki & Taufani, G. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum (Filsafat, Teori Dan Praktek). Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Winanti, Teti. (2021). Hukum Dalam Bentuk Kompensasi Bagi Korban Pelanggaran Ham Berat Dari Perspektif UU No. 26 Tahun 2000. Journal Educational Research and Social Studies. 2(3), 107-116 http://dx.doi.org/10.51178/cjerss.v2i3.261
Abstract viewed = 0 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 0 times
