Akibat Hukum Cacat Kehendak dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Melalui Pinjaman Online Pada E-Commerce

  • Ayusari Chandraningtyas UPN Veteran Jakarta
  • Sulastri Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, UPN Veteran Jakarta, Indonesia

Abstract

Technological advancements have transformed the lifestyle of society in various fields, including the economy, education, social aspects, and others. This is evident in the increasing number of internet users, one of which is e-commerce. Transactions conducted on e-commerce platforms are considered valid when there is an electronic contract or other form of agreement indicating the consent of the parties involved. Typically, this electronic contract is represented by the terms and conditions of the e-commerce platform. However, what if the contract contains elements of defective consent, such as fraud, misrepresentation, or coercion? In several prior studies found by the researcher, there has been no discussion of the elements of defective consent in online purchase agreements involving online loans in e-commerce. This research contributes to understanding the legal consequences related to defective consent in online purchase agreements, provides guidance for avoiding potentially problematic transactions, and highlights the need for better supervision of online purchase transactions involving online loans in e-commerce. This study employs a juridical-normative method, and the approach used is the statutory approach and the case approach. The research delves into the validity of purchase agreements involving online loans in e-commerce and their legal implications concerning defective consent. The research discusses the validity criteria of agreements based on the Civil Code and the Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE) Law. In the context of purchase transactions, the agreement's validity is recognized if both subjective and objective criteria are met. However, defective consent, such as misrepresentation and fraud, can affect the validity of the agreement, which can be annulled if the subjective criteria are not met.

References

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2022). Jumlah Penduduk Pertengahan Tahun (Ribu Jiwa), 2021-2023. https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/12/1975/1/jumlah-penduduk-pertengahan-tahun.html. Diambil 7 April 2023, dari https://www.bps.go.id/indicator/12/1975/1/jumlah-penduduk-pertengahan-tahun.html

Bayu, D. (2022). APJI: Pengguna Internet Indonesia Tembus 210 Juta Pada 2022. https://dataindonesia.id/digital/detail/apjii-pengguna-internet-indonesia-tembus-210-juta-pada-2022.

Bestari, N. P. (2022). Cerita Ratusan Mahasiswa IPB Terjerat Pinjol Rp 650 Juta. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/tech/20221219185849-37-398275/cerita-ratusan-mahasiswa-ipb-terjerat-pinjol-rp-650-juta.

Budiono, H. (2009). Ajaran Umum Hukum Perjanjian & Penerapannya di Bidang Kenotariatan. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Gede, I., Yudana, V., Nyoman, I., Budiartha, P., Gde, D., & Arini, D. (t.t.). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU USAHA MELALUI SISTEM CASH ON DELIVERY PADA MARKETPLACE. https://doi.org/10.31598/juinhum.3.3.5770.379-385

Internet World Stats ; Usage and Population Statistics. (t.t.). https://www.internetworldstats.com/asia.htm.

J, S. (1995). Hukum Perikatan: Perikatan Yang Lahir dari Perjanjian. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. (t.t.).

Nurul, S., Dalimunthe, I. S., Hukum, F., Pembangunan, U., Veteran, N., Jalan, J., Fatmawati Nomor, R. S., Kota, J., & Selatan, I. (t.t.). PENYALAHGUNAAN KEADAAN DALAM PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI APARTEMEN SEBAGAI PEMBATAS PEMENUHAN AZAS KESEIMBANGAN. Desember, 8(2), 298–311. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt57b690acdbfdd/diduga-wanprestasi--penghuni-apartemen-gugat-

Pakpahan, E. F., Gabriel, A., Situmeang, M., Sianipar, J., & Rambe, Y. P. (2023). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DALAM PERJANJIAN MEMINJAM UANG SECARA ONLINE PADA APLIKASI HOME CREDIT. 4(2), 2746–5047. https://doi.org/10.55637/juinhum.4.2.7595.248-254

Pradnyawati, N. M. E., Sukandia, I. N., & Arini, D. G. D. (2021). Perjanjian Pinjaman Online Berbasis Financial Technology (Fintech). Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 2(2), 320–325. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.2.3230.320-325

Priyambawa, N. A., Nyoman, I., Budiartha, P., Sagung, A. A., & Dewi, L. (t.t.). PERJANJIAN ELEKTRONIK PADA PINJAMAN ONLINE. https://doi.org/10.55637/juinhum.3.3.5803.455-460

Putri, R. N. dan S. N. I. S. D. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Kurir dalam Sistem Cash on Delivery Belanja Online. Jurnal Voleksgeist, 4, 194.

R, S. (2011). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Sinar Grafika.

S, A. (2009). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Kartika.

Saputra, R. (2019). Kedudukan Penyalahgunaan Keadaan (Misbruik Van Omstandigheden) Dalam Hukum Perjanjian Indonesia. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Setiawan, R. (1982). Tinjauan Elementer Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum. Alumni.

Subekti. (2005). Hukum Perjanjian. Intermasa.

Sukananda, S. dan W. A. M. (2020). Akibat Hukum Terhadap Perjanjian Yang Mengandung Cacat Kehendak Berupa Kesesatan Atau Kekhilafan (Dwaling) Di Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia. Justitia Jurnal Hukum, 4, 171.

Widia, I. K., & Budiartha, I. N. P. (2022). Cacat Kehendak Sebagai Dasar Batalnya Perjanjian. KERTHA WICAKSANA, 16(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.22225/kw.16.1.2022.1-6

Published
2024-01-03
Abstract viewed = 132 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 371 times