Problematika Penggunaan Rangka Enhanced Smart Architecture Frame Pada Sepeda Motor yang Cacat Produksi (Studi Kasus Kerusakan Rangka Motor Matic Honda)
Abstract
A problem to the use of Enhanced Smart Architecture Frame (eSAF) in motorcycles that suffer from manufacturing defects. The eSAF framework is an innovation in the motorcycle industry. However, in some cases, defects occur in the frame, which can cause accidents and losses to consumers. This research method uses juridical-normative, by using literature studies of data, positive law, and other legal materials. This research purposes to analyze aspects of consumer legal protection and producer responsibility of the defective eSAF frames with a case study on damaged frames. This research show that consumers who experience accidents due to eSAF frames have not received legal protection as Article 4 of the UUPK hasn’t been fulfilled. Consumers are entitled to receive compensation for losses caused by product use and KUHPer Articles 1504 - 1512 related to defective products. In addition, PT AHM has also not carried out its responsibilities properly, because it has rejected the claims of losses suffered by consumers and withdrawn its products, which is contrary to UUPK Article 7 Jo.. Article 8. Regarding the use of eSAF frames on motorcycles that have production defects, BPKN as government representaion should investigate the case as a step to prevent accidents and provide strict sanctions for business actors who are proven to harm the public as consumers. PT AHM must immediately withdraw all its products that use the eSAF frame as a form of responsibility and compensate for the losses suffered by consumers when accidents occur when using its products.
References
Amiruddin, & Asikin, Z. (2010). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Hamzah, Andi. (2005). Kamus Hukum. Ghalia Indonesia.
Anggraini, O. E., Yulifa, W. R., & Santoso, A. P. A. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Atas Garansi Produk Dalam Hukum Bisnis. Jurnal Hubsintek, Vol. 1, 161–168.
Anisarida, A. A., & Santosa, W. (2019). Korban Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas Di Kota Bandung. Jurnal Himpunan Pengembangan Jalan Indonesia, Vol. 5 No. 2, 129–136. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26593/jh.v5i2.3373.129-136
Ariyanto, B., Purwadi, H., & Latifah, E. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Mutlak Penjual Akibat Produk Cacat Tersembunyi dalam Transaksi Jual Beli Daring. Refleksi Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 6 No. 1, 107–126.
Badan Pusat Statistik RI. (2021). Statistik Transportasi Darat 2021.
Barkatullah, A. H. (2017). Hak-Hak Konsumen. Nusa Media.
Kristiyanti, Celina Tri Siwi. (2008). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Sinar Grafika.
Harahap, R. Z. (2016). Aspek Hukum Perlindungan Terhadap Penumpang Bus Dalam Mewujudkan Perlindungan Konsumen. De Lega Lata Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol. 1 No. 1, 211–233.
Hardjasoemantri, K. (1988). Hukum Tata Lingkungan. Gajah Mada University Press.
Hamid, Haris. (2017). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen Indonesia, . CV. Sah Media.
Kristiasi, G. N. (2015). Pengaruh Product Recall Terhadap Citra Perusahaan, Loyalitas Dan Niat Beli Konsumen. E-Journal Atmajaya.
Ndun, I. J. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Atas Garansi Suku Cadang Sepeda Motor Honda, . Mimbar Keadilan Jurnal Ilmu Hukum.
Panjaitan, H. (2021). Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Permata Aksara.
Putra, C. A. G., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen dalam Persfektif Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat. Jurnal Analogi Hukum, Vol. 5 No. 1, 86–92.
Putra, N. G. F. S., Arini, D. G. D., & Suryani, L. P. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Khusus Jasa Penumpang Angkutan Darat. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, Vol. 1 No. 1, 83–88.
Setyawati, D. A., Dahlan, & Rasyid, M. N. (2017). Perlindungan Bagi Hak Konsumen Dan Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Dalam Perjanjian Transaksi Elektronik, . Syiah Kuala Law Journal, Vol. 1 No. 3, 33–51.
Tampubolon, W. S. (2016). Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Ditinjau Dari Undang Undang Perlindungan Konsumen 2016. Jurnal Ilmiah “Advokasiâ€, Vol. 04. No. 01, 53–61.
Utomo, A. A. (2019). Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Terhadap Konsumen Tentang Produk Cacat Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999. Lex Privatum, Vol. 7 No. 6, 31–39.
Wahyudi, I. N. K., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Konsumen Akibat Cacat Produk Pada Saat Produksi Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1999. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, Vol. 3 No. 1.
Wardana, M. W., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Yang Dirugikan Atas Produk Elektronik Yang Tidak Bergaransi, . Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, Vol. 3 No. 1, 72–77.
Abstract viewed = 463 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 830 times
