Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Menentukan Tuntutan Pidana terhadap Kasus Penganiayaan Berat

Ni Putu P Novi Widiantari; I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha; Ni Made Sukaryati Karma

doi:10.22225/juinhum.3.2.5067.292-297

Ni Putu P Novi Widiantari
I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa
Ni Made Sukaryati Karma Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.3.2.5067.292-297

Abstract

In Indonesian law, there is one piece of evidence called Visum et Repertum. The evidence is in the form of a statement from an expert in Judicial Medicine or Forensic Medicine obtained from the examination of the victim's body. The purpose of this study was to analyze the form of the Visum et Repertum equation as a valid evidence in the crime of serious maltreatment and to examine the strength of the proof of the post-mortem as evidence in determining the prosecution for cases of severe maltreatment. Visum et Repertum is one of the most important pieces of evidence in cases of severe abuse because it can assist judges in making decisions. This study uses a normative legal method which uses a statutory, conceptual, and deductive-inductive logical reasoning approach. The sources of the legal materials for this study are primary legal materials which contain the Criminal Code, the Criminal Procedure Code, the Law on the Principal Powers of Judges, the Law on the Indonesian Attorney General's Office, and the Law on the Indonesian National Police. Secondary legal materials consisting of: print and electronic literacy relevant to this . Data collection techniques used: library techniques and note-taking techniques, the data was collected then analyzed systematically through arguments formed from legal logic. This finds that Visum et Repertum is not explained directly in the Criminal Procedure Code, but the evidence from the examination relating to the body or life is considered valid and can be a consideration for judges in deciding a case with valid evidence.

References

Radja, L. M. A. G., Sugiartha, I. N. G., & Karma, N. M. S. (2022). Kewenangan Kejaksaan dalam Melakukan Penahanan terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian di Sosial Media. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, Vol.3(1), 65.

Idries, A. M. (2009). Pedoman Praktis Ilmu Kedokteran Forensik; bagi praktisi hukum. Sagung Seto.

Risnayani. (2013). Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. PGSD Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan. Universitas Tadulako.

Setiady, T. (2009). Pokok-Pokok Ilmu Kedokteran Kehakiman. Alfabeta, Bandung.

Soedirjo. (1985). Jaksa dan hakim dalam proses pidana. Jakarta: Akademika Pressindo.

Soeparmono, R. (2016). Keterangan Ahli dan visum et repertum dalam aspek hukum acara pidana. Mandar Maju, Bandung.

Waluyadi. (2005). Ilmu kedokteran kehakiman : dalam perspektif peradilan dan aspek hukum praktik kedokteran. Djambatan.

Azis, I. W., & Hamsir. (2022). Peranan Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat. Alauddin Law Development Journal, Vol.4(1).

Nisa, Y. K., & Krisnan, J. (2015). Kekuatan Visum Et Repertum sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Mengungkapkan Terjadinya Tindak Pidana. Varia Justicia, Vol.11(2).

Yusuf, M., Karim, M. S., & Badaru, B. (2020). Kedudukan Visum Et Repertum Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Dakwaan Penuntut Umum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat. Journal of Lex Generalis, Vol.1(2).