Peranan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik
Abstract
This study is included in the category of empirical legal research carried out to fulfill the following objectives, 1) Assessing the rules related to criminal act of defamation in the Information and Electronic Transactions Law, 2) Examining the process of legal proof in criminal act of defamation under the Law of Information and Electronic Transactions. From the results of data analysis, it can be concluded that along with the increasing number of criminal cases through online media, the enforcement of electronic documents as legal evidence becomes very important due to the absence of physical evidence. The rules regarding the criminal act of defamation are included in the "Law. No.11 / 2008 article 5 paragraph (1) and (2) on Information and Electronic Transactions "where the presence of this new law is an enlightenment related to online criminal cases (cybercrime). Then, it was also found that only if the use of trial evidence was in accordance with the existing regulations in Indonesia, then proof of a criminal act, especially defamation, could be said to be legitimate. Substantially, defamation is classified as a criminal offense, so it is necessary to have a way of proof if the case occurred is not physically but through online media (Cybercrime).
References
Ali, M. (2010). Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Sarana Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (Kajian Putusan MK No. 2/PUU-VII/2009). Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(6), 119–146.
Fakhriah, E. L. (2009). Bukti Elektromik dalam Sistem Pembuktian Perdata. Alumni. Bandung.
Hamzah, A. (1987). Aspek-aspek Pidana Dibidang Komputer. Sinar Grafika. Jakarta.
Herawati, E. (2011). Komunikasi dalam Era Teknologi Komunikasi Informasi. Humaniora, 2(1), 100–109.
Jailani. (2015). Sistem Demokrasi di Indonesia Ditinjau dari Sudut Hukum Ketatanegaraan. Jurnal Inovatif, 8, 1.
Mahmudah, D. (2016). Pengetahuan dan Pendapat Pemilih Pemula terhadap Akses Informasi Publik. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi Dan Media, 20(2), 241–258.
Marzuki, L. (2010). Konstitusionalisme dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 8(4), 479–488.
Parsaorantua, P. H., Pasoreh, Y., & Rondonuwu, S. A. (2017). Implementasi Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Jurnal Acta Diurna, 6(3), 1–14.
Prakoso, D. (1988). Alat Bukti dan Kekuatan Pembuktian di dalam Proses Pidana. Liberty. Yogyakart.
Zainal, A. (2010). Pengantar dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarata. Yarsif Watampone.
Abstract viewed = 302 times
PDF downloaded = 731 times
