Sistem Hukum Penanggulangan Darurat Kesehatan dalam Perspektif Omnibus Law: Relasi terhadap Hak Asasi Manusia
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to examine various problems in overcoming the past health emergency (Covid-19 pandemic), and to initiate the use of the concept of omnibus law in the context of harmonizing the legal system for overcoming health emergencies with a human rights perspective. This research applies the normative research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The results show that the current regulation on health emergency management is still not comprehensive enough to guarantee legal certainty and protection of human rights. For example, the authority to determine regional quarantine in the hands of the Central Government is in fact not very effective, because each region in Indonesia has its own characteristics, so it would be better to apply regional quarantine asymmetrically by handing over the authority to determine regional quarantine to local governments who know better the real conditions in their regions. Then in terms of procurement and implementation of vaccinations, starting from the absence of legal certainty and protection to obtain halal-certified products (vaccines) as mandated in Law Number 33 of 2014 concerning Halal Product Guarantee, to the imposition of sanctions for delaying or terminating social security which actually contradicts Law Number 40 of 2004 concerning the National Social Security System. Therefore, it is necessary to harmonize the legal instruments for health emergency management using the concept of omnibus law which will revise all regulations related to the acceleration of infectious disease prevention, such as the implementation of regional quarantine, the application of sanctions, guarantees of community needs, to regulations related to the implementation of vaccinations.
References
Ansari, M. I. (2020). Omnibus Law untuk Menata Regulasi Penanaman Modal. Jurnal RechtsVinding. 9(1). 71–90. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i1.378
Buana, M. S. (2017). Menakar Konsep Omnibus Law dan Consolidation Law untuk Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia: Pendekatan Perbandingan Hukum Tata Negara. Konferensi Nasional Hukum Tata Negara dan Hukum Administrasi Negara ke-4. Jember. Diambil dari http://eprints.ulm.ac.id/4359/
Chandranegara, I. S. (2020). Kompabilitas Penggunaan Metode Omnibus dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 2(27), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol27.iss2.art2
Dana, I. K. S. P., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2021). Sanksi Pidana terhadap Tenaga Medis yang Melakukan Pemalsuan Surat Keterangan Rapid Test Covid 19. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum. 2(1). 53–58. https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.2.1.3091.53-58
Disantara, F. P. (2020). Tanggung Jawab Negara dalam Masa Pandemi Covid-19. JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum). 6(1). 48–60. http://doi.org/10.33760/jch.v6i1.262
Fajar, M., & Achmad, Y. (2015). Dualisme Penelitian Normatif dan Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.
Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2021). Aktualisasi nilai-nilai pancasila dan konstitusi melalui pelokalan kebijakan Hak Asasi Manusia (HAM) di daerah. Jurnal Indonesia Berdaya. 2(2). 157–166. https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.2021136
Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2021b). Sanksi Penundaan atau Penghentian Jaminan Sosial Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum. 1(2). 133–174. https://doi.org/10.19184/jkph.v1i2.24452
Fauzia, A., Hamdani, F., Rusdianto, R., & Mohamed, M. A. (2023). Implementation of the Omnibus Law Concept and Consolidated Texts: Amalgamation of the Common Law and Civil Law Legal Systems. Journal of Law and Legal Reform. 4(2). https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v4i2.68256
Fauzia, A., Khori, B. Y. U. Al, & Rahayu, P. (2022). Constitutionality of Implementing Asymmetric Lockdown (Regional Quarantine) When Covid-19 Increases to Accelerate Health Emergency Management. Law Research Review Quarterly. 8(1). 33–66. https://doi.org/10.15294/lrrq.v8i1.54359
Gama, M. D. M., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Ujianti, N. M. P. (2022). Pengaturan Jaminan Sosial Ketenagakerjaan bagi Pekerja Informal pada Masa Pendemi Covid 19. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum. 3(2). 237–242.
Garijto, D., & Aditya, R. (2020). 6 Daerah di Indonesia Terapkan Karantina Wilayah Cegah Penyebaran Covid-19. Diambil dari https://www.suara.com/news/2020/03/29/154459/6-daerah-di-indonesia-terapkan-karantina-wilayah-cegah-penyebaran-covid-19?page=3
Hamilton, V. L., & Sanders, J. (1992). Everyday Justice: Responsibility and the Individual in Japan and the United States. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Henry Campbell Black. (1968). Black’s Law Dictionary: Definitions of The Terms and Phrases of American and English Jurisprudence, Ancient and Modern. St. Paul: West Publishing Co.
Huijbers, T. (1995). Filsafat Hukum dalam Lintasan Sejarah (8 ed.). Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Hukum Online. (2017). Menimbang Konsep Omnibus Law Bila Diterapkan di Indonesia. Diambil dari https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt58a6fc84b8ec3/menimbang-konsep-omnibus-law-bila-diterapkan-di-indonesia/
Kattsoff, T. A., Kusuma, M. W., Haerunnisa, B. V., Hamdani, F., & Fauzia, A. (2022). Konsep Pengaturan Pemberlakuan Karantina Wilayah (Lockdown) Saat Covid-19 Meningkat di Indonesia. Indonesia Berdaya. 3(1). 83–92. https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.2022166
Kusumaputra, A., & Retnowati, E. (2020). Analisis Yuridis Dasar Pertimbangan Kebijakan Lockdown pada Situasi Darurat Kesehatan di Tingkat Daerah. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum. 49(3). 222–232. 10.14710/mmh.49.3.2020.222-232
Kuswanto, H., & Retno, E. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Pasal 30 Peraturan Daerah Jakarta tentang Vaksinasi Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Hak Asasi Manusia. Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 5(1), 21–40.
Lele, G. (2021). Kebijakan Pandemi Pertimbangkan Keragaman Daerah. Diambil dari https://www.uii.ac.id/kebijakan-pandemi-pertimbangkan-keragaman-daerah/
Rahardjo, S. (2004). Menghadapi Kemelut dengan Membangun suatu Kultur Berhukum yang Baru. Seminar “Mengurai Benang Kusut Penegakan Hukum dalam Sistem Peradilan di Indonesia.” Semarang: Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Rusdianto, Kusuma, L. A. N., Gunawan, M. S., Fauzia, A., & Hamdani, F. (2022). Diskursus Hukum: Analisis Tanggung Jawab Negara dalam Menanggulangi Peningkatan Kasus Covid-19 melalui Penerapan Karantina Wilayah/Lockdown. Indonesia Berdaya. 3(1). 53–60. https://doi.org/10.47679/ib.2022162
Sahbani, A. (2020). Plus-Minus Omnibus Law di Mata Pakar. Diambil dari Hukum Online website: https://m.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5e3325327d597/plus-minus-omnibus-law-di-mata-pakar/
Saputra, A. E. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Berbasis “Informed Consent” atas Pelaksanaan Program Imunisasi di Indonesia. RECHTSREGEL: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. 1(2). 235–254. https://doi.org/10.32493/rjih.v1i2.2216.
Tuwu, D. (2020). Kebijakan Pemerintah Dalam Penanganan Pandemi Covid-19. Journal Publicuho, 3(2), 267–278. http://dx.doi.org/10.35817/jpu.v3i2.12535
Wahid, A., Hamdani, F., & Fauzia, A. (2024). Pengujian Undang-Undang: Mengurai Konsep Judicial Review & Judicial Preview. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Widiati, E. P. (2013). Achieving Accessibility of Legislation via Consolidation (Institute of Advanced Legal Studies). Institute of Advanced Legal Studies. Diambil dari https://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/5882/
Widodo, H., & Disantara, F. P. (2021). Problematik Kepastian Hukum Darurat Kesehatan Masyarakat Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Suara Hukum. 3(1). 197–226. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v3n1.p197-226
Wignjosoebroto, S. (2012). Negara Hukum dan Permasalahan Akses Keadilan di Negeri-Negeri Berkembang Pasca-Kolonial. Konferensi dan Dialog Nasional. Jakarta.
Wikanto, A. (2022). Masyarakat Bebas Tanpa Masker di Luar Ruangan, Ini Penjelasan Jokowi. Diambil dari https://amp.kontan.co.id/news/masyarakat-bebas-tanpa-masker-di-luar-ruangan-ini-penjelasan-jokowi
Wulan, E. R., & Kuswanto, H. (2021). Kajian Yuridis Pemakaman Protokol Kesehatan Ditinjau dari Hak untuk Mendapatkan Kebenaran Informasi Pasal 14 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Hak Asasi Manusia. Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan. 5(1). 1–20. https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v5i1.4070