Signs in Kawen Sai Ceremony of Tetun Tribe
Abstract
This study examines the meaning of signs in Kawen Sai, the traditional patrilineal marriage system of Tetun tribes of Belu Regency. Qualitative descriptive method was applied in designing the study. In addition, Pierce’s theory of semiotics was used as the underlying parameter in analyzing the data. Observation, interview and recording techniques were used in collecting the data from 10 informants. The results show that signs in Kawen Sai ceremony comprise 36 forms and belong to symbol. Meaning implied beyond these signs are sanctity, ritual, modesty, majesty, respect, petition, hope, social, and communication systems.References
Alfano, M. (2017). Daughters, dowries, deliveries: The effect of marital payments on fertility choices in India. Journal of Development Economics, 125(March 2015), 89–104.
Anderson, S. (2007). Why the marriage squeeze cannot cause dowry inflation. Journal of Economic Theory, 137(1), 140–152.
Bravo, M. del M. P., MartÃnez, P. A., & Ruiz, I. J. (2014). Arranged Marriages: Women for Sale. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 132, 564–569.
Doina, D., Calin, F., Anisoara, P., Elena-Adriana, T., & Nicoleta, M. (2012). Specific Cultural Communication Through Archaic Signs and Symbols. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1619–1623.
Fortunato, L. (2015). Marriage Systems, Evolution of. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition (Second Edition, Vol. 14). Elsevier.
Hartmann, T., & Vossebeld, N. (2013). A semiotic framework to understand how signs in construction process simulations convey information. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 27(3), 378–385.
Impara, E. (2018). A social semiotics analysis of Islamic State’s use of beheadings: Images of power, masculinity, spectacle and propaganda. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 53(August 2017), 25–45.
Jensen, K. B. (2015). Semiotics. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 21, 592–597.
Kilstrup, M. (2015). Naturalizing semiotics: The triadic sign of Charles Sanders Peirce as a systems property. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 119(3), 563–575.
Mingers, J., & Willcocks, L. (2017). An integrative semiotic methodology for IS research. Information and Organization, 27(1), 17–36.
Mody, P. (2015). Marriage. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 14, 599–604.
Przymus, S. D., & Kohler, A. T. (2018). SIGNS: Uncovering the mechanisms by which messages in the linguistic landscape influence language/race ideologies and educational opportunities: Linguistics and education. Linguistics and Education, 44, 58–68.
Rachmawati, I. (2016). Model of Indonesia-Timor Leste Land Border Management by Optimizing the Cross-Border Post in Belu Regency , East Nusa Tenggara, (August), 1–14.
Rodliyah, S. (2017). Between Economic Burden and Cultural Dignity: Belis in the Marital Custom of the NTT Society. Komunitas: International Journal of Indonesian Society and Culture, 9(1), 92.
Sudaryanto. (1985). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University.
Tainaka, K. ichi, & Itoh, Y. (1994). Glass effect in a prescribed marriage system. Physics Letters A, 187(1), 49–53.
Yakin, H. S. M., & Totu, A. (2014). The Semiotic Perspectives of Peirce and Saussure: A Brief Comparative Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 155(October), 4–8.
Zhang, X., & Sheng, J. (2017). A Peircean semiotic interpretation of a social sign. Annals of Tourism Research, 64(135), 163–173.
Zoezt, A. V. & P. S. (1992). Serba-Serbi Semiotika. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Copyright (c) 2018 RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons-Non Ceomercial-Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA)