A Move Analysis of Abstracts in a Scopus-indexed Applied Linguistics Journal from Different Quartiles
Abstract
The competitive nature of today’s science leads to the upsurge of publication in scientific journals. Publishing in an international journal with a reputable index such as Scopus, in particular, has gained a significant emphasis. Despite this fact, studies on the rhetorical organization of the abstract section of a research article (RA) through the perspective of Scopus journal quartiles remain scant. Driven by the gap in literature, this study aims to examine whether journal’s quartile affects the rhetorical organization and linguistic realizations of the abstracts. A corpus of 40 RA abstracts was obtained from one Scopus-indexed applied linguistics journal, which over the years, had improvements in terms of its quartiles. The abstracts were divided into three groups: each representing different quartiles of the journal (i.e., Q2, Q3, Q4). Employing a comparative approach using both qualitative and quantitative research methods, Hyland’s (2000) model of rhetorical organization was employed as the main framework to code the rhetorical moves, whereas a statistical analysis (i.e., Z-test) was performed on the moves and steps’ occurrences. The findings showed that there is a significant difference in the steps’ occurrence and tense realization between the groups, indicating that to some extent, the journal’s quartile indeed played a role. The study offers recommendations for further research.
References
Al-Ali, M. N., & Sahawneh, Y. B. (2011). Rhetorical and textual organization of English and Arabic PhD dissertation abstracts in linguistics. SKY Journal of Linguistics, 24.
Al-Khasawneh, F. M. (2017). A genre analysis of research article abstracts written by native and non-native speakers of English. Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 4(1), 1–13.
Al-Shujairi, Y. B. J., Ya’u, M. S., & Buba, J. A. (2016). Role of moves, tenses, and metadiscourse in the abstract of an acceptable research article. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2 S1), 379–379.
Amnuai, W. (2019). Analyses of rhetorical moves and linguistic realizations in accounting research article abstracts. International and Thai-Based Journals.
Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. N. (2016). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Routledge.
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. Longman.
Bhatia, V. K. (1997). Introduction: Genre analysis and world Englishes. World Englishes, 16(3), 313–319.
Bloch, J. (2010). A concordance-based study of the use of reporting verbs as rhetorical devic. Es in Academic Papers. Journal of Writing Research, 2(2).
Can, S., Karabacak, E., & Qin, J. (2016). Structure of moves in research article abstracts in applied linguistics. Publications, 4(3), 23.
Candarh, D. (2012). A cross-cultural investigation of English and Turkish research article abstracts in educational sciences. Studies about Language, 2, 12–17.
Chalak, A., & Norouzi, Z. (2013). Rhetorical moves and verb tense in abstracts: A comparative analysis of American and Iranian academic writing. International Journal of Language Studies, 7(4), 110–114.
El-Dakhs, D. A. S. (2018). Comparative genre analysis of research article abstracts in more and less prestigious journals. Linguistics Journals in Focus. Research in Language, 16(1), 47–63.
Gani, F. G., Kurniawan, E., Gunawan, W., & Lubis, A. H. (2021). Rhetorical moves analysis in soft and hard science lecturers’ master’s thesis and dissertation abstracts. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020), 156–161.
Hardjanto, T. D. (2017). Common discourse patterns of cross-diciplinary research article abstracts in English. Humaniora, 29(1), 72–84.
Harisbaya, A. I., Qurratu’aini, S. F., Kanafani, A., Nurcik, A. B., Kurniawan, E., & Lubis, A. H. (2021). A comparative study on rhetorical moves of IJAL’s abstracts written by UPI’s lecturers and by UPI-other Indonesian universities’ lecturers. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2021), 150–156.
Hartley, J. (2003). Improving the clarity of journal abstracts in psychology: The case for structure. Science Communication, 24(3), 366–379.
Huang, J. C. (2018). Marine engineering and sub-disciplinary variations: a rhetorical analysis of research article abstracts. Text & Talk, 38(3), 341–363.
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. K. (2019). Academic discourse and global publishing: Disciplinary persuasion in changing times. Routledge.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. The University of Michigan Press.
Kafes, H. (2012). Cultural traces on the rhetorical organization of research article abstracts. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 3(3), 207–220.
Kanafani, A., Nurcik, A. B., Harisbaya, A. I., Qurratu’aini, S. F., Kurniawan, E., & Lubis, A. H. (2021). Rhetorical move and linguistic features comparative analysis of research article abstracts by authors of different organizational backgrounds. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2021).
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24, 269–292.
Kaya, F., & Yagiz, O. (2020). Move analysis of research article abstracts in the field of ELT: A comparative study. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(1), 390–404.
Khany, R., & Malmir, B. (2019). A move-marker list: A study of rhetorical move-lexis linguistic realizations of research article abstracts in social and behavioural sciences. RELC Journal, 1–36.
Kosasih, F. R. (2018). A genre analysis of thesis abstracts at a state university in Banten. Lingua Cultura, 12(1), 9–14.
Kurniawan, E., & Sabila, N. A. (2021). Another look at the rhetorical moves and linguistic realizations in international and Indonesian journal articles: A case of tourism research article abstracts. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 318–329.
Kurniawan, E., Lubis, A. H., Suherdi, D., & Danuwijaya, A. A. (2019). Rhetorical organization of applied linguistics abstracts: Does Scopus journal quartile matter? Studies, GEMA Online® Journal of Language, 19(4), 184–202.
Li, X. (2020). Mediating cross-cultural differences in research article rhetorical moves in academic translation: A pilot corpus-based study of abstracts. Lingua, 238.
Lorés, R. (2004). On RA abstracts: From rhetorical structure to thematic organization. English for Specific Purposes, 23(3), 280â€302.
Lubis, A.H., & Kurniawan, E. (2020). A review of genre analysis of research abstracts: Lessons learned and recommendations for future research directions, pedagogical practices, and policies: Contemporary theory and research. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Press.
Martin-Martin, P. (2003). A genre analysis of English and Spanish research paper abstracts in experimental social sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 22, 25–43.
Nakamaru, S. (2010). Lexical issues in writing center tutorials with international and US-educated multilingual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(2), 95–113.
Pho, P. D. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: A study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance.,. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231–250.
Pratiwi, S. N., & Kurniawan, E. (2021). Rhetorical move and genre knowledge development of English and Indonesian abstracts: A comparative analysis. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(3), 885–900.
Putri, F., Hermawan, B., & Muniroh, R. D. (2021). Rhetorical move analysis in students’ abstracts across degrees. In Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020), 162–167.
Ren, H., & Li, Y. (2011). A comparison study on the rhetorical moves of abstracts in published research articles and master’s foreign-language theses. English Language Teaching, 4(1), 163–166.
Saeeaw, S., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2014). Rhetorical variation across research article abstracts in environmental science and applied linguistics. English Language Teaching, 7(8), 81–93.
San, L. Y., & Tan, H. (2012). A comparative study of the rhetorical moves in abstracts of published research articles and students’ term papers in the field of computer and communication systems engineering. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(7), 40–50.
Santos, M. B. D. (1996). The textual organization of research paper abstracts in applied linguistics. Text & Talk, 16(4), 481–500.
Suntara, W., & Usaha, S. (2013). Research article abstracts in two related disciplines: Rhetorical variation between linguistics and applied linguistics. English Language Teaching, 6(2), 84–99.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Tankó, G. (2017). Literary research article abstracts: An analysis of rhetorical moves and their linguistic realizations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 27, 42-55.
Tseng, F. P. (2011). Analyses of move structure and verb tense of research article abstracts in applied linguistics journals. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 27.
Vathanalaoha, K., & Tangkiengsirisin, S. (2018). Genre analysis of experiment-based dental research article abstracts: Thai and international journals. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature®, 24(3).
Ventola, E. (1994). Abstracts as an object of linguistic study. In Writing vs speaking: Language, text, discourse, communication (pp. 333-352). Gunter Narr Verlag.
Wahyu, L. C. (2016). The rhetorical moves and verb tense in research article abstracts. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 4(4), 187-192.
Yoon, J., & Casal, J.E. (2020). Rhetorical structure, sequence, and variation: A step-driven move analysis of applied linguistics conference abstracts. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 462-478.
Zhang, B., Bui, T. T. Q., & Pramoolsook, I. (2012). Moves and linguistic realizations: English research article abstracts by Vietnamese agricultural researchers. The Asian ESP Journal, 8(3), 126-149.
Zibalas, D., & Šinkūnienė, J. (2019). Rhetorical structure of promotional genres: The case of research article and conference abstracts. Discourse and Interaction, 12(2), 95-113.
Copyright (c) 2022 RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. We are continuously working with our author communities to select the best choice of license options, currently being defined for this journal as follows: Creative Commons-Non Ceomercial-Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA)
Abstract viewed = 490 times
PDF downloaded = 770 times
2.png)
