The Verbs with the Notion of Eating in Manggaraian Language: Natural Semantic Metalanguage Analysis

  • Tobias Gunas Universitas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus Ruteng
  • Sebastianus Menggo Universitas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus Ruteng
  • Yosefina Helenora Jem Universitas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus Ruteng
Keywords: Natural semantic metalanguage, Manggaraian language, Verb

Abstract

The aim of this research is to explicate and account for the verb of eating in Manggaraian language. There are some verbs denoting the meaning of eating, such as hang, lompong, jumik, mboros, takung, la’ur, alas, pongo mu’u. The qualitative research method was applied to unveil and explain the explication of meaning in the given verbs respectively. Field-observation and recording  were the techniques used to gather the data from the natural speakers utterances as well as part of the data were based on the researchers’ intuitive knowledge as the native speakers. The data were analyzed through the theory of Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM). The results of the analysis reveal that Manggaraian language has the inventory  of verbs designating the meaning of eating such as hang, jumik, lompong, mboros, takung, raci, alas, pongo mu’u.  In terms of semantic prime, the verbs are under the category of the action verb. Comparing to the other verbs, the verbs jumik, lompong, pongo mu’u have more delicate meaning of eating. Furthermore, those verbs are classified into generic and specific category of meaning.  The verbs “hang, jumik, mboros” are generic in meaning while the verbs lompong alas,racik, pongo mu’u, takung are specific in meaning. The verbs are categorized into non-compositional polysemy. Regarding the explication of meaning, the verbs reveal the action and the process of eating involving certain parts of body (hands and mouth) as well as specific tools (plate, spoon, bowl).

References

Allan, K. (1986). Linguistic Meaning. Routledge.

Allan, K. (2016). A history of semantic. In Riemer, N. The routledge handbook of semantics. In The Routledge Handbook of Semantics (First edit). Tylor & Francis Group.

Cavanagh, R. F., Asano-Cavanagh, Y., & Fisher, W. P. (2019). Natural Semantic Metalanguage as an approach to measuring meaning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1379(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1379/1/012019

Fromkin, Victoria, Rodman, Robert & Hyams, N. (2011). An Introduction to Language (9th ed.). WADSWORTH CENGAGE Learning.

Gladkova, A., Vanhatalo, U., & Goddard, C. (2016). The semantics of interjections: An experimental study with natural semantic metalanguage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37(4), 841–865. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000260

Goddard, C. (2012). The Natural Semantic Metalanguage Approach. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0018

Griffths, P. (2006). Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics (H. Giegerich (ed.)). Edinburgh University Press.

Jama, K. B., Ardika, I. W., Ardhana, I. K., Setiawan, I. K., & Menggo, S. (2020). Metaphor construction in caci performance of Manggarai speech community. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(3), 418–426. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1103.10

Jensen, D. F. N. (2006). Metaphors as a bridge to understanding educational and social contexts. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 1–17.

Menggo, S. (2017). Budaya lonto léok dalam kemampuan berbicara bahasa Inggris. The 1st International Conference on Language, Literature and Teaching, 764–772.

Menggo, S., & Suastra, I. . M. (2020). Language use and language attitudes of Sumbawanese speakers in Bali. Register Journal, 13(2), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i2.333-350

Menggo, S., Suastra, I. M., Budiarsa, M., & Padmadewi, N. N. (2019). Speaking for academic purposes course: An analysis of language functions. E-Journal of Linguistics, 13(2), 314–332. https://doi.org/10.24843/e-jl.2019.v13.i02.p10

Mulyadi, M., & Siregar, R. K. (2006). Kajian makna dalam linguistik. Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Dan Sastra, 2(2), 69–75.

Nasution, L. Y., & Mulyadi, M. (2020). Market names in Medan: A natural semantic metalanguage study. RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 13(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v13i2.11985

Rannas, K. S., & Rosa, R. N. (2020). A semantic analysis of Minangkabaunese verbs connected to the semantic primes touch : A natural semantic metalanguage study. E-Journal of English Language & Literature, 9(3), 1–8.

Sarwadi. (2016). Predicate of Mangan in Sasak Language: A Study of Natural Semantic Metalanguage. Journal of Language and Culture, 2. https://doi.org/10.24843-IjLc.2016.v02.i02.p08]

Setiawan,Inten Purnama Sari Luh Gede, L. Sutjiati Beratha, N. W. S. (2019). Meaning of Phrasal Verb ‘Pick up’ Subtype Do/Happen: A Natural Semantic Metalanguage Approach. E-Journal of Linguistics, 13(2), 347. https://doi.org/10.24843/e-jl.2019.v13.i02.p13

Wearing, C. (2009). Metaphor and the Natural Semantic Metalanguage. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5), 1017–1028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.01.004

Published
2021-10-19
How to Cite
Tobias Gunas, Sebastianus Menggo, & Yosefina Helenora Jem. (2021). The Verbs with the Notion of Eating in Manggaraian Language: Natural Semantic Metalanguage Analysis. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 7(2), 191-200. https://doi.org/10.22225/jr.7.2.3826.191-200
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 227 times
PDF downloaded = 240 times