Logophoricity-and-Discourse Syntax in Indonesian

  • I Nyoman Udayana Program Studi Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Udayana Jalan Nias 13 Denpasar 80114, Bali, Indonesia
  • Ni Luh Ketut Mas Indrawati Program Studi Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Udayana Jalan Nias 13 Denpasar 80114, Bali, Indonesia
Keywords: Logophoric Pronoun, Reflexive Pronoun, Discourse Syntax, Subject Position, Passivization

Abstract

Indonesian lacks dedicated logophoric pronouns. Instead, logophoric references are encoded through the use of reflexive pronouns within the discourse context. This study aims to elucidate the relationship between reflexive anaphors and logophoricity in Indonesian. Specifically, it seeks to demonstrate that a particular form, namely the complex reflexive formed by combining diri with possessive pronouns, is exclusively associated with logophoricity. The data for this study was extracted from naturally occurring expressions found in the Leipzig corpora. Analysis was conducted using discourse syntax, which examines the interplay between syntax and the surrounding textual environment, to observe the resulting phenomena. The findings indicate that logophors in Indonesian differ significantly from reflexive anaphors in four key aspects. Firstly, logophoric pronouns, unlike reflexive pronouns, can be bound at a long distance. Nevertheless, they still adhere to the principles of binding theory regarding their antecedents. Secondly, logophoric pronouns may not necessarily agree in phi features with their antecedents. Thirdly, the logophoric anaphor can occupy various grammatical functions, including both object and subject positions. Lastly, unlike reflexivization, logophoric constructions in Indonesian are subject to passivization.

References

Arka, I Wayan and Christopher D. Manning. (1998). Voice and grammatical relations in Indonesian: A new perspective. Proceedings of the LFG98 Conference The University of Queensland, Brisbane.

Arka, I Wayan. (2002). Voice systems in the Austronesian languages of Nusantara: Typology, symmetricality and Undergoer orientation. Paper presented at the 10th National Symposium of the Indonesian Linguistics Society, Bali-Indonesia.

Arka, I W. (2003). Balinese Morphosyntax: A Lexical-Functional Approach. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, School of Pacific and Asian Studies, the Australian National University.

Büring, D. (2005). Binding Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Clements, G. N. (1975). The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse. Journal of West African Languages 10.141-177

Culy, C. (1994). Aspects of Logophoric Marking. Linguistics, 32:1055-1094.

Culy, C. (1997). Logophoric Pronouns and Point of View. Linguistics, 35: 845-849

Hagège, C. (1974). Les Pronoms Logophoriques. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 69.287-310.

Halliday, M.A.K. and Ruqaiya Hasan. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Huang, Y. (2000). Anaphora: A Cross-linguistic Study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Himmelmann, Nikolaus P. and Sonja Riesberg. (2013). Symmetrical Voice and Applicative Alternations: Evidence from Totoli. Oceanic Linguistics. 52 (2): 396-422.

Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum. (2005). A Student’s Introduction to the English Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hyman, Larry M., and Bernard Comrie. (1981). Logophoric reference in Gokana. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 3.19-37.

Koster, J., & Reuland, E. (eds.). (1991). Long-Distance Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kuno, S. (1987). Functional Syntax: Anaphora, Discourse, and Empathy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Nomoto, Hiroki (2018). The development of the English-type passive in Balinese in Wacana, 19 (1): 149-167.

Nomoto, Hiroki (2021) Overlooked bare voice constructions in Western Austronesian in NUSA, 71: 1-18.

Oshima, D. Y. (2004). On Emphatic and Logophoric Binding. Workshop on Semantic Approaches to Binding Theory. Nancy, France August 2004

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.

Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Satik, D., (2022) “Unraveling Balinese Binding”, Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7(1).

Sells, P. (1987). Aspects of Logophorocity. Linguistic Inquiry 18.445-479.

Sneddon, James Neil. (1996). Indonesian: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.

Spencer, A. & Luís, A. R. (2012). Clitics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Trask, R.L. (1993). A Dictionary of Grammatical Terms in Linguistics. London: Routledge.

Udayana, I Nyoman. (2013). Voice and Reflexives in Balinese. Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin. Dissertation

Udayana, I Nyoman (2022 a). On the Distribution of Reflexive Anaphors and Logophoric Anaphors in Balinese in Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12 (9): 1848-1857.

Udayana, I Nyoman (2022 b). Di- Passive and Discourse Context in Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13 (6): 1304-1312.

Published
2024-08-06
How to Cite
I Nyoman Udayana, & Ni Luh Ketut Mas Indrawati. (2024). Logophoricity-and-Discourse Syntax in Indonesian. RETORIKA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 10(2), 642-651. https://doi.org/10.55637/jr.10.2.10250.642-651
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 39 times
PDF downloaded = 29 times