ANALISIS GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN PEREMPUAN DALAM PROSES PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN DI DINAS SOSIAL, PEMBERDAYAAN PEREMPUAN DAN PERLINDUNGAN ANAK (DINSOS P3A) PROVINSI BALI

Authors

  • Ni Putu Arianta Seftiani seftiani Administrasi Publik, Universitas Warmadewa, Indonesia
  • Victorius Adventius Hamel Administrasi Publik, Universitas Warmadewa, Indonesia
  • Anak Agung Gde Brahmantya Murti Administrasi Publik, Universitas Warmadewa, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22225/jcpa.6.1.2026.65-75

Keywords:

women’s leadership, decision-making, relational leadership, collaborative leadership, public bureaucracy

Abstract

Women’s leadership in public organizations has gained increasing attention in public administration studies, particularly within bureaucratic contexts that remain dominated by hierarchical authority structures. Although the representation of women in structural positions has increased, changes in organizational decision-making practices have not always occurred significantly. Most previous studies have focused on the characteristics of women’s leadership styles or comparisons with male leadership, leaving limited attention to how women’s leadership is enacted and negotiated within hierarchical bureaucratic structures. This study aims to analyze how women’s leadership is implemented in decision-making processes and how such practices interact with and are negotiated within the bureaucratic power structure at the Department of Social Affairs, Women’s Empowerment, and Child Protection (Dinsos P3A) of Bali Province. This research employs a descriptive qualitative approach, with data collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis involving leaders and staff. Data were analyzed thematically by drawing on the perspectives of collaborative leadership, relational leadership, and postcolonial feminism. The findings indicate that women’s leadership in Dinsos P3A Bali consistently emphasizes collaborative and relational approaches through open communication, participatory discussion forums, and cross-sectoral coordination involving staff in decision-making processes. However, such involvement tends to be consultative in nature, as strategic decisions remain concentrated within the formal authority of top leadership in a hierarchical bureaucratic structure. This condition suggests that women’s leadership does not fundamentally transform bureaucratic power structures but operates adaptively through collaborative strategies within existing institutional constraints. The novelty of this study lies in its analysis of how women’s leadership is negotiated within hierarchical bureaucratic structures, thereby contributing to public administration scholarship, particularly in understanding the dynamics of power relations and the practices of women’s leadership in bureaucratic organizations.

References

Abdulatif, T., & Omar, S. (2019). From Curriculum Reform to Classroom Practice: Intentions, Perceptions, and Actual Implementation in English Secondary Schools in Libya.

Akkaya, B., & Bagie?ska, A. (2022). The Role of Agile Women Leadership in Achieving Team Effectiveness through Interpersonal Trust for Business Agility. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074070

Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). In Sage Publications.

Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., & Van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, Transactional, and Laissez-Faire Leadership Styles: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Women and Men. In Psychological Bulletin (Vol. 129, Number 4). https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569

Flyvbjerg, B. (n.d.). CASE STUDY. Retrieved https://ssrn.com/abstract=2278194

Hsu, N., Newman, D. A., & Badura, K. L. (2022). Emotional Intelligence and Transformational Leadership: Meta-Analysis and Explanatory Model of Female Leadership Advantage. Journal of Intelligence, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence10040104

Miles, M. at al. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 11, Number 1).

Mokat, J., Sendouw, R. H. E., Mantiri, J., & Rantung, M. I. R. (2022). Decision-Making of Women Leaders in Government Organizations. SHS Web of Conferences, 149. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202214903008

Munive, A., Donville, J., & Darmstadt, G. L. (2023). Public leadership for gender equality: A framework and capacity development approach for gender transformative policy change. In eClinicalMedicine (Vol. 56). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101798

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2021). Organizational Behavior, Updated Global Edition. In Pearson.

Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak?.pdf. In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture.

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif.

Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. In Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research (Vol. 53, Number 5). https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108

Yunus, M. (2016). Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan. Lentera Pendidikan?: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 19(1).

Published

2026-05-30