KETIMPANGAN SPASIAL DALAM DISTRIBUSI BANSOS PANGAN 2024: SEBUAH UJI NETRALITAS FISKAL DI INDONESIA

Authors

  • Misbahuddin Ilmu Administrasi, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia
  • Andi Rahmat Nizar Hidayat Ilmu Administrasi, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22225/jcpa.6.1.2026.53-64

Keywords:

food social assistance, spatial inequality, fiscal neutrality, beneficiary families, spatial analysis

Abstract

Socio-economic inequality across regions remains a structural challenge in Indonesia’s national development, particularly in the distribution of social assistance programs, which often generates perceptions of fiscal unfairness among provinces. Differences in the number of beneficiaries are frequently interpreted as unequal budget allocation, although such variation does not necessarily reflect bias in policy design based on fixed formulas. This study aims to analyze spatial inequality in the distribution of the 2024 Food Social Assistance Program and to examine fiscal neutrality in budget allocation across provinces in Indonesia. The research employs a quantitative explanatory approach with a cross-sectional design using provincial-level secondary data derived from official government reports. Data analysis is conducted through simple linear regression to examine the relationship between the number of Beneficiary Families and allocated budgets, inequality measurement using the Coefficient of Variation and the Gini Index, and spatial autocorrelation analysis using Moran’s I and the Local Indicator of Spatial Association to identify geographic clustering patterns. The results reveal a deterministic linear relationship between the number of beneficiaries and budget allocation, indicating that the distribution folLows a fixed formula-based mechanism and is fiscally neutral without discretionary intervention across regions. The distribution of beneficiaries exhibits a high level of inequality and forms significant spatial clusters, particularly in regions characterized by higher socio-economic vulnerability and geographic proximity. The novelty of this study lies in integrating fiscal neutrality testing with inequality measurement and spatial statistical analysis within a single comprehensive analytical framework that remains rarely applied in social assistance studies in Indonesia. These findings provide empirical contributions to data-driven public administration research and offer policy implications for designing more spatially responsive social interventions to improve targeting accuracy, distribution effectiveness, and the overall quality of redistributive policies at the national level.

References

Ahmad, E., & Brosio, G. (2022). Handbook of Fiscal Federalism. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Allison, P. D. (2010). Survaival Analysis Using SAS: A Practical Guide. SAS Institute inc.

Anselin, L. (1995). Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x

Bappenas. (2023). Laporan Pembangunan Indonesia 2023. Kementerian PPN/Bappenas.

Bastagli, F., Hagen-Zanker, J., Harman, L., Barca, V., Sturge, G., & Schmidt, T. (2021). Cash Transfers: What Does the Evidence Say? Overseas Development Institute.

Bird, R. M., & Smart, M. (2020). Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: International Lessons for Developing Countries. World Development, 135, 105044.

Boadway, R., & Shah, A. (2021). Fiscal Federalism: Principles and Practice of Multiorder Governance. Cambridge University Press.

Cliff, A. D., & Ord, J. K. (1981). Spatial Processes: Models and Applications. Pion.

Cowell, F. A. (2011). Measuring Inequality (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Dall’erba, S., & Le Gallo, J. (2021). Regional Convergence and Spatial Econometrics. Regional Studies, 55(1), 1–13.

Elhorst, J. P. (2022). Spatial Econometrics: From Cross-Sectional Data to Spatial Panels. Springer.

Fischer, M. M., & Getis, A. (2020). Handbook of Applied Spatial Analysis. Springer.

Gentilini, U., Almenfi, M., & Blomquist, J. (2022). Social Protection and Jobs Responses to COVID-19. World Bank.

Hidayat, R., & Sari, N. (2021). The Effectiveness of Social Assistance Programs in Reducing Poverty in Indonesia. Journal of Public Policy and Governance, 11(2), 89–102.

Kanbur, R., & Venables, A. J. (2020). Spatial Inequality and Development. Oxford University Press.

LeSage, J., & Pace, R. K. (2009). Introduction to Spatial Econometrics. CRC Press.

Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2021). Fiscal Decentralization and Intergovernmental Transfers. Public Finance Review, 49(4), 567–593.

Oates, W. E. (1999). An Essay on Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Literature, 37(3), 1120–1149.

OECD. (2021). Fiscal Federalism 2021: Making Decentralisation Work. OECD Publishing.

Rahmawati, D., & Handayani, S. (2021). Spatial Inequality in Regional Development in Indonesia. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 13(2), 89–102.

Rey, S. J., & Montouri, B. D. (2020). US Regional Income Convergence: A Spatial Econometric Perspective. Regional Studies, 54(12), 1670–1682.

Roy, S. (2024). Spatial Econometric Analysis of Regional Inequality. Regional Science Policy & Practice, 16(1), 45–60.

Shah, A. (2022). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Development. World Bank.

Suryahadi, A., Sumarto, S., & Pritchett, L. (2023). The Evolution of Social Protection in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 59(1), 1–25.

TNP2K. (2021). Basis Data Terpadu untuk Program Perlindungan Sosial di Indonesia.

Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2021). Economic development (13th editi). Pearson.

UNDP. (2022). Human Development Report 2022. United Nations Development Programme.

Ursu, R. (2024). Spatial Patterns of Inequality in Developing Regions. Journal of Regional Analysis, 18(2), 120–135.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2019). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Yongheng, D. (2024). Regional Disparity and Spatial clustering: Evidence from Developing Countries. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 17(2), 233–250.

Published

2026-05-30