The Construction of Field in Science Popularization Stories
Abstract
Systemic Functional Linguistics proposes a model of language that views texts as context-situated social activities. Context is modeled into two levels: context of culture which accounts for variation according to genre, and context of situation which accounts for variations according to three dimensions: field, tenor and mode. The register variable field, understood as the way in which a particular domain of experience is construed and organized through ideational meanings, is explored in a corpus of science popularization stories. The aim is to understand how science as a social activity is represented in these texts and to gain insights on how this approach can be useful in English as a Foreign Language reading courses in university environments. The data collected From a corpus of 60 popularization articles from the science popularization website Science Daily, including 30 stories extracted from the subsection Fitness in the Health section and 30 from the Chemistry Section, we randomly selected 10 stories from each field. One component of the Rhetorical Structure (Presentation of the Popularized Research) is selected to identify entities, activities and qualities through an analysis of Transitivity. Taxonomies are constructed related to the following entities: researchers, institutions, research reports, and research. The results show how the fields of doing science and reporting science are construed in this component through the description of those entities and the activities they are involved in. Pedagogical implications are suggested in relation to the design of pedagogical materials in EFL university reading courses.References
Bhatia, V. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional settings. Essex: London
Coffin, C. (1996). Exploring literacy in school history: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged Schools Program, NSW Department of School Education.
Coffin, C. (2006). Historical discourse: the language of time, cause and evaluation. London: Continuum.
Eggins, S. (1994). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter.
Eggins, S., Wignell, P., & Martin, J. R. (1993). The Discourse of History: Distancing the Recoverable Past. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Registers in Written English: situational factors and linguistic features (pp. 75-109). London: Pinter.
Figini, F. & Rezzano, S. (in press). The generic structure of science popularization stories: an exploratory analysis for pedagogical purposes in university reading courses. Proceedings of the 27th European Systemic Functional Linguistic Conference. Salamanca, 29 June-01 July, 2017.
Figueiredo, D. (2010) Context, register and genre: Implications for language education. Revista Signos 43, Número Especial Monográfico Nº 1, 119-141.
Halliday, M.A.K & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (1999). Construing Experience through meaning. A language-based approach to cognition. London: continuum.
Halliday, M.A.K & Matthiessen, C.M.I.M. (2014). Halliday´s Introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Hao, J. (2010). Exploring ‘doing biology’: A multifunctional investigation of undergraduate Honours’ and related published research warrants. University of Sydney. Unpublished MA Thesis.
Hao, J. (2015). Construing biology: An Ideational Perspective. University of Sydney. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis.
Humphrey, S., & Hao, J. (2013). Deconstructing written genres in Undergraduate Biology. Linguistics and the Human Sciences, 7(1-3), 29-53.
Iedema, R. (1995). Literacy of Administration (Writing it Right Literacy in Industry Research Project - Stage 3). Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged School Program.
Martin, J. R. (1992). English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Martin, J. R. (1993a). Life as a noun: Arresting the universe in science and humanities. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 242-293). London: The Falmer Press.
Martin, J. R. (1993b). Technicality and abstraction: Language for the creation of specialized texts. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 223-241). London: The Falmer Press.
Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2008). Genre Relations. Mapping Culture. London: Equinox.
Muñoz, V. L. (2015). The vocabulary of agriculture semi-popularization articles in English: A corpus-based study. English for Specific Purposes, 39, 26–44.
Nagano, R. (1996). Materials for vocabulary in context: short popular science texts for EST. Language Center, Nagaoka University of Technology. Available in http://lib.nagaokaut.ac.jp/kiyou/data/language/g10/G10_5.pdf.
Nwogu, K. N. (1991). Structure of Science Popularizations: A genre-analysis Approach to the Schema of Popularised Medical Texts. English for Specific Purposes, 10, 111-123.
Painter, C. (2001). Understanding genre and register: Implications for language teaching. In A. Burns & C. Coffin (Eds.), Analysing English in a global context: A reader (pp. 167-180). London: Routlege/Macquarie University/The Open University.
Rose, D. (1997). Science, technology and technical literacies Genre and institutions. Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 40-72). London and New York: Continuum.
Rose, D. (1998). Science discourse and industrial hierarchy. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science (pp. 236-265). London and New York: Routledge.
Rose, D & Martin, J, R. (2012). Learning to Write, Reading to Learn: Genre, Knowledge and Pedagogy in the Sydney School. Sheffield (UK) and Bristol (USA): Equinox Publishing Ltd.
Wignell, P., Martin, J. R., & Eggins, S. (1993). The discourse of geography: Ordering and explaining the experiential world. In M. A. K. Halliday & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Writing science: Literacy and discursive power (pp. 151-183). London: Falmer.
Copyright (c) 2019 International Journal of Systemic Functional Linguistics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Abstract viewed = 367 times
PDF downloaded = 355 times
