Chafe’s Semantic Structure Processes Versus Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar Processes

  • Luu Quy Khuong University of Foreign Language Studies, the University of Danang, Viet Nam
  • Doan Phan Anh Truc Quang Nam University, Viet Nam
Keywords: Functional component, Meaning, Processes, Semantic structure, Sign,

Abstract

Processes are seen as a language phenomenon involving the participant of various language elements realized by verbals, nominal groups or adverbials. How these elements occur in the processes depends on linguists’ concepts of processes. The paper aims to consider Chafe’s processes and Halliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar processes to see what similarities and differences are. The study was conducted with qualitative methods in order to analyse materials and analyse the data collected. The data include samples extracted from four literary works in English which are The Man of Property, The Old Man and the Sea, the Call of the Wild and the Moon and Sixpence. The findings can point out some differences and similarities of processes by Chafe and Halliday. At the same time, the results will help those who pay much attention to this language phenomenon have a deeper understanding in order to equip themselves with background knowledge of language learning and research.

Author Biographies

Luu Quy Khuong, University of Foreign Language Studies, the University of Danang, Viet Nam
Associate Professor, Meritorious Teacher Dean, Faculty of Int'l Studies, University of Foreign Language Studies, the University of Danang, Viet Nam
Doan Phan Anh Truc, Quang Nam University, Viet Nam
Senior teacher of English at Quang Nam University, Viet Nam Doctoral Candidate at The University of Da Nang

References

Bavali, M., & Sadighi, F. (2008). Chomsky's universal grammar and Halliday's systemic functional linguistics: An appraisal and a compromise. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 11-28.

Chafe, W.L. (1970). Meaning and the structure of language. London: The University of Chicago.

Chandler, D. (2007). Semotics-the basics. London and New York: Routledge.

Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax.Cambridge, Mass: MIT.

Firth, J. R. (1935). "The technique of semantics." Transactions of the Philological Society, 36-72; p. 37 (Reprinted in Firth (1957) Papers in Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press, 7-33).

Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (1985/2004). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Arnold.

Malinowski, B. (1935). Coral gardens and their magic, Volume 2. London: Allen and Unwin.

Moris, C. W. (1938). Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Mourelatos, A. (1978). Events, Processes and States. In Linguistics and Philosophy (2), 415-434. Holland: D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.

O’Donnell, M. (2012). Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics for Discourse Analysis. Language, Function and Cognition, pp. 1-8.

Saussure, F. (1916). Course in general linguistics. NewYork: Columbia University Press.

Published
2019-05-17
Section
Articles
Abstract viewed = 406 times
PDF downloaded = 590 times