A Literature Review of Hate Speech: Forensic Linguistics Study
Abstract
Language is something that all people have, so all languages (and different ways of saying the same thing) are the same. In other words, they all share the exact genetic blueprint and are equally "human." The aim of the research is to describe a literature review of hate speech: forensic linguistics study.This research employs a descriptive methodology. Some forensic linguistics-related publications and papers comprise the data for this study. The result shows that with the help of forensic linguistics, it is possible to look into how people talk about legal issues arising from it. As an interdisciplinary field, forensic linguistics analyzes and defines courtroom language as evidence for police, judges, and attorneys. Forensic linguistics looks at texts like emergency calls, ransom demands and other threats, suicide letters, last words from death row, and confessions and denials by public figures. In addition, several areas of forensic linguistics can be investigated in legal matters, including auditory phonetics, acoustic phonetics, interpretation of expressed meaning (semantics), interpretation of inferred meaning (discourse and pragmatics), stylistics, and questioned authorship, the language of the law, language of the courtroom, interpretation, and translation. it may be decided that speech and language are inextricably linked and cannot be separated
References
Beryandhi, M. (2020). Media Baru dan Fenomena Hate Speech di Indonesia: Media Penyakit Sosial Baru.
Carnegie, D. (1956). How to Develop Influence People by Public Speaking. In Pocket Books.
Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2010). Handbook of forensic linguistics. Routledge.
Dirgantara, A. (2021). 419 Konten Medsos Ditegur Terkait Hate Speech dalam 100 Hari Kapolri.
Fasold, R. W. (2006). An Introduction to Language and Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Finegan, E. (2004). Language: Its Structure and Use (5th ed.). Wadsworth.
Gibbons, M. T. (2002). Tafsir Politik: Telaah Hermeneutis Wacana Sosial Politik Kontemporer. Qalam.
John Olsson. (2008). Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction To Language, Crime and the Law (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Lyons. (1977). A Pragmatic Analysis of Deixis in a Religious Text. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(2).
McMenamin, G. . (2004). Forensic linguistics: Advances in forensic stylistics. Cambridge University Press.
Ningrum, D. J., Suryadi, & Wardhana, E. C. (2018). Kajian Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial. Jurnal Ilmiah Korpus, 2(3).
Rozakis, L. (1995). Complete Idiot’s Speaking in Public with Confidence. Penguin.
Scott, M. (2001). Comparing corpora and identifying key words, collocations, and frequency distributions through the Word Smith Tools suite of computer programs. Small Corpus Studies and ELT, 47–67.
Umiyati, M. (2020). A Literature Review of Forensic Linguistics. IJFL (International Journal of Forensic Linguistics), 1(1), 23–29.
Abstract viewed = 266 times
PDF downloaded = 483 times
